16:00:58 #startmeeting Octavia 16:00:58 Meeting started Wed Dec 6 16:00:58 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:58 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 16:01:03 o/ 16:01:04 o/ 16:01:17 o/ 16:03:22 #topic Announcements 16:04:01 FYI there are some discussions for removing eventlet from OpenStack 16:04:06 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/902585 16:04:19 we don't use it but some dependencies do (oslo.messaging, taskflow) 16:05:14 Oslo messaging should NOT be using it given the configuration settings we use, but that is broken and a bug. Did you open a launchpad for that? I seem to remember you were going to. 16:08:41 right 16:08:45 I didn't get any feedback 16:09:06 https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/2043661 16:10:26 Oh! Ok, that bug doesn't highlight the root problem for Octavia. (I.e. that eventlet should not be loaded when we set that config setting) 16:10:44 I will see if I can comment on that today to call out the root bug 16:10:59 ok thanks johnsom 16:12:52 any other announcements? 16:13:17 no 16:17:57 I'm going to skip CI status, no update this week 16:18:03 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 16:21:02 does octavia have a deadline for integration of specs? milestone-2 is in the second week of January already? 16:21:42 I think it's the same as Feature Freeze 16:21:48 should be milestone-3 16:22:04 ok, that should be end of Feb then I think 16:22:07 Specs are earlier than that I thoguht 16:23:05 Yeah, usually MS2. I don't think we call it out specifically on the release schedule 16:23:31 I can't remember where that is listed now. Maybe in the template docs in tree 16:23:56 ok, I am reviewing the sriov spec right now 16:26:46 great 16:27:07 hey I have one question tweining johnsom 16:27:23 we recently merged "Added olso_middleware.sizelimit support" 16:27:29 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/902049 16:27:43 do you think it is backportable? 16:28:08 it adds a new setting that may change the behavior of the API 16:28:40 As long as the default value for the size is acceptable to Octavia yes. However, given single-call-create may exceed that, I am not sure it is wise to backport 16:28:46 but I doubt that someone will face hit 16:29:19 johnsom: I did some tests, you need to create LB with 140 listeners + pools + members to reach the limit 16:29:35 (in a single call) 16:29:50 The default is 114688 16:29:56 that said, it may be a valid test use case 16:30:02 So, yeah, if you think it is enough, then propose it. 16:30:18 We hit problems on Designate with the import zone feature 16:30:40 And some of the tests that tried to use max length values in the API 16:30:52 ok, I will test it again 16:31:37 the limit is pretty high. I also think issues with backporting it would be unlikely. 16:34:22 I don't have time to play around with it, so I leave it to your judgement if it's a safe default to backport. 16:34:40 ack 16:35:38 #topic Open Discussion 16:38:04 nothing from me 16:39:09 ok! thank you guys! have a good week 16:39:13 #endmeeting