16:00:26 <gthiemonge> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:26 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Mar 29 16:00:26 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:26 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:26 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:30 <gthiemonge> Hi there
16:00:32 <johnsom> o/
16:00:35 <gthiemonge> long time no see
16:00:35 <tweining> o/
16:00:43 <johnsom> lol
16:01:58 <gthiemonge> #topic Announcements
16:02:00 <gthiemonge> * PTG week
16:02:12 <gthiemonge> yesterday was the Octavia PTG session
16:02:16 <gthiemonge> really good discussions
16:02:34 <gthiemonge> in case you missed it, the notes are in the etherpad
16:02:41 <gthiemonge> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/bobcat-ptg-octavia
16:03:58 <tweining> bobcat will come with quite a few improvements as it seems
16:04:12 <tweining> (if things go as planned)
16:04:41 <gthiemonge> I need to check the notes from other projects but I heard that there are some plans to deprecate more python-*client projects (barbican)
16:06:11 <johnsom> I don't think they are going to be able to deprecate python-barbicanclient in Bobcat. I think there is work to do on sdk for them.
16:06:35 <gthiemonge> right
16:06:48 <gthiemonge> we need to think about that in the next releases
16:07:04 <tweining> I guess there is no date for the migration to Launchpad yet, but it will be announced in time here.
16:07:16 <johnsom> Yeah, we should probably check all of the clients. nova, glance, barbican, cinder
16:07:37 <gthiemonge> tweining: I'll send an email and prepare the patches to update the links
16:10:21 <gthiemonge> any other announcements?
16:11:51 <gthiemonge> #topic CI Status
16:12:00 <gthiemonge> CI is in a better shape this week :D
16:12:11 <gthiemonge> grenade and pep8 jobs are fixed
16:12:16 <gthiemonge> things are merging properly
16:12:48 <gthiemonge> still not sure on the status of the ubuntu jammy nested virt hosts from the vexxhost nodepool
16:13:09 <gthiemonge> no failure this week
16:13:44 <johnsom> Yeah, I'm not sure either. Neutron was also having similar issues.
16:14:00 <johnsom> It sounds like it was due to vexxhost still running bonic hypervisors with bugs
16:14:49 <johnsom> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1999249/comments/4
16:15:08 <gthiemonge> it seems that they were progressively updating those hypervisors, maybe it will be fine
16:15:41 <tweining> only the grenade job failed, right?
16:15:57 <gthiemonge> nop
16:16:06 <gthiemonge> the scenario jobs
16:19:27 <gthiemonge> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:19:52 <gthiemonge> Folks pinged us on IRC to get review for:
16:19:59 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/877414
16:20:06 <gthiemonge> tweining: could you take a look ^ ?
16:20:31 <tweining> sure
16:21:18 <gthiemonge> on my side, I rebased the amphorav1-removal patch chain
16:21:25 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:amphorav1-removal
16:21:29 <gthiemonge> I think it is ready
16:22:09 <gthiemonge> I rebased the changes for sqlalchemy2 on top of it, but it fails because we need to merge a patch in taskflow first (and to get a new release)
16:23:11 <tweining> all the persons present know it already, but I mention it for the record: I updated patch for testing SLURP upgrades, and it should be ready for review too
16:23:27 <tweining> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/860221
16:24:06 <gthiemonge> tweining: can you proactively backport it to 2023.1? just to check if it runs properly there
16:24:15 <tweining> sure
16:24:39 <gthiemonge> thanks
16:25:10 <opendevreview> Tom Weininger proposed openstack/octavia stable/2023.1: Add octavia-grenade-slurp CI job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/878928
16:25:44 <gthiemonge> #topic Open Discussion
16:26:07 <tweining> maybe one more comment to the slurp patch
16:27:02 <tweining> before there was octavia-grenade-ffu in "periodic". I moved it to check, because I saw some other project did it that way too
16:27:54 <gthiemonge> I think we can remove the ffu job now we have the slurp job
16:28:20 <tweining> yeah, the new job replaces the ffu job
16:28:41 <gthiemonge> ack
16:29:31 <gthiemonge> I think it's fine to have the slurp in the check
16:30:57 <johnsom> +1
16:32:14 <gthiemonge> any other topics for this week?
16:33:08 <tweining> I hope next week I can present some profiling results. Apart from that nothing from my side.
16:33:15 <gthiemonge> +1
16:33:23 <gthiemonge> ok! thank you guys!
16:33:28 <gthiemonge> #endmeeting