16:00:26 <gthiemonge> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:26 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Feb  1 16:00:26 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:26 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:26 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:29 <gthiemonge> hi folks
16:00:36 <oschwart> o/
16:00:44 <tweining> o/
16:01:49 <johnsom> o/
16:02:19 <matfechner> o/
16:03:24 <gthiemonge> #topic Announcements
16:03:39 <gthiemonge> * PTL Elections
16:04:20 <gthiemonge> FYI Today begins the 2023.2 Election season
16:04:25 <gthiemonge> #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031960.html
16:05:55 <gthiemonge> * Antelope Release Schedule
16:06:08 <gthiemonge> Next week is final release for non-client libs!
16:06:28 <gthiemonge> If you want to add patches to octavia-lib, this is the deadline
16:07:25 <gthiemonge> any other announcements folks?
16:08:02 <tweining> I think no
16:08:31 <gthiemonge> BTW Feature freeze is in 2 weeks
16:09:29 <tweining> is sqlalchemy2 migration considered a feature?
16:09:57 <johnsom> Yes
16:10:10 <gthiemonge> cool, I would rather wait for the B cycle
16:10:12 <johnsom> Plus I don't think we are done there.
16:10:33 <johnsom> It's a high risk change, so should land prior to feature freeze.
16:10:41 <tweining> other than that I don't see a new feature at first glance over the priority review list
16:10:54 <tweining> (except the ones merged)
16:11:12 <gthiemonge> Barbican secrets consumers?
16:11:35 <tweining> right
16:11:50 <gthiemonge> johnsom: what about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/862671/
16:11:55 <gthiemonge> "Add zookeeper backend for jobboard in devstack"
16:12:08 <gthiemonge> it only changes the devstack files
16:12:13 <gthiemonge> is it a feature patch?
16:13:25 <johnsom> I will need to check if the barbican client release has happened, it was planned for Antelope, so we should be able to merge that for Antelope.
16:13:51 <gthiemonge> nice
16:14:16 <johnsom> Zookeeper would be a feature as welll, but as mentioned, it's really just test coverage/devstack, so should be lower risk for including in antelope.
16:15:29 <gthiemonge> right, it's not enabled by default
16:15:56 <johnsom> This is what I got from the barbican team (#openstack-barbican) last week: johnsom: we still have the last patch to merge for barbicanclient command line changes, we'll merge it this week and create a release shortly after
16:16:17 <gthiemonge> ok
16:17:25 <gthiemonge> #topic CI Status
16:17:36 <gthiemonge> Nothing to report here AFAIK
16:18:54 <gthiemonge> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:19:41 <tweining> the neutronclient removal patches can be reviewed now
16:19:56 <tweining> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/866327
16:20:12 <gthiemonge> great!
16:20:16 <johnsom> This would be another patch we should land before feature freeze or bump to bobcat
16:20:26 <tweining> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/870514 (not sure if it belongs here though)
16:20:51 <gthiemonge> if the octavia patch merges, we need to ensure that the ovn-octavia-provider merges too
16:21:05 <gthiemonge> (or there will be conflicts with the config options :/)
16:21:28 <tweining> I'm still doing some manual tests though esp. wrt. various config variants
16:21:41 <gthiemonge> I think this is a big patch for Octavia, but it's not a difficult patch to review
16:22:19 <oschwart> I tested it for some time, and it looked good to me
16:22:24 <gthiemonge> 1. we need to ensure that we are communicating with neutron with 2 different methods (service_auth or tenant context)
16:22:25 <tweining> yeah it's an XL patch, but easy to review. and it makes no sense to split it into smaller pieces IMO
16:22:29 <johnsom> Nope, OVN provider is a neutron project, that is not something we will track
16:22:40 <gthiemonge> 2. we need to check that the paramas of the methods have not been renamed
16:22:52 <gthiemonge> johnsom: we need to help them to track it
16:23:43 <johnsom> Yeah, that is fine. I assume the release notes call out any incompatibility it may cause for the provider drivers? (I have not looked at this patch yet)
16:24:11 <gthiemonge> I think the release notes are solid. but I'll double-check
16:24:33 <tweining> yeah, please do. thanks
16:24:35 <johnsom> Oh, and if they were using code outside of our documented API, that is on them.....
16:25:22 <johnsom> Landing the Octavia side early is a good indication to the providers to fix their issues where they didn't follow the guide.
16:26:59 <gthiemonge> yeah
16:28:35 <gthiemonge> #topic Open Discussion
16:33:36 <gthiemonge> no additional topic?
16:34:42 <tweining> no I guess
16:35:27 <johnsom> I don't have anything
16:35:42 <johnsom> Be sure to sign up for the virtual PTG if you haven't yet
16:36:09 <gthiemonge> I think I did it twice, or not. I don't remember
16:36:18 <tweining> I did it a while ago
16:36:23 <oschwart> Me too
16:38:16 <gthiemonge> ok, so I think that's all for today!
16:39:06 <gthiemonge> thanks!
16:39:08 <gthiemonge> #endmeeting