16:01:33 #startmeeting Octavia 16:01:34 Meeting started Wed Mar 4 16:01:33 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:37 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 16:01:38 #chair rm_work 16:01:39 Current chairs: johnsom rm_work 16:02:01 Hi everyone. I thought rm_work was planning to be there today.... 16:02:08 hi 16:02:32 #topic Announcements 16:02:53 I have two reminders on our up coming deadlines 16:02:56 Octavia-lib final Ussuri release is week of 3/30 16:02:58 hi 16:03:12 o/ sorry 16:03:15 meeting ran over 16:03:34 Remember that octavia-lib must release before feature freeze. So we need to make sure we land our octavia-lib patches sooner rather than later. 16:03:40 That is just weeks away 16:04:10 For our other repos, the feature freeze MS3 is coming up as well 16:04:11 Other projects feature freeze is week of 4/6 16:04:39 rm_work I will hand it over to you. I just wanted to remind everyone of the upcoming deadlines 16:06:57 ah kk 16:08:17 ok then... any other announcements? 16:08:51 moving on... 16:08:53 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 16:09:37 Remind of jobboard #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/647406/ 16:09:42 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/octavia+branch:master+topic:az-tweaks 16:09:50 PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY 16:10:02 I am making good progress on the failover patch. Most of the tests are now implemented. I'm just down to the network driver changes now. 16:10:05 these are not SO complex, and we need them to land for AZ support to not be completely broken 16:10:15 Small fix for noop related to amphorav2 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709696/ 16:11:02 I reviewed the first on the chain already... :P 16:11:15 And just pointing that test change with making amphorav2 default https://review.opendev.org/#/c/697213/ passing all tests :) 16:11:17 Sadly, this has become a large patch due to the test requirements and the gaps we had in testing for the previous implementation(s) 16:11:21 \o/ 16:11:30 rm_work, scenario test coverage? 16:12:02 Also of note, I'm not sure if any of the NDSU students are here for the meeting, but they have started to post some patches. 16:12:15 Please help them out with reviews as you can. 16:12:20 cgoncalves: yeah, the scenario tests actually haven't merged yet for AZs -- they are not fully accurate... unfortunately I am not sure how to make them work properly -- they may need at least two-node testing to function, too... 16:12:44 I am hoping that is more reliable now and I can get those fixed up with some help maybe from someone who understands how nova/neutron ops work :D 16:15:57 ok, does anyone else have any specific topics today? 16:15:58 #topic Open Discussion 16:16:10 You missed an agenda item 16:16:20 ah, johnsom you had something on the provider driver docs right? 16:16:23 ah was that in the agenda? 16:16:33 #topic Updating the available drivers page 16:16:43 Yes, remember agendas? 16:16:45 lol 16:16:46 no :D 16:16:53 literally forgot that was a thing 16:17:07 (I just load up the last meeting log, and copy/paste the topics in order) 16:17:29 Recently we have had a number of comments/requests/confusion about the available provider drivers for Octavia 16:17:41 I setup a page: 16:18:01 #link https://docs.openstack.org/octavia/latest/admin/providers.html 16:18:26 To allow folks to "advertise" the availability of drivers, but sadly no one has updated it. 16:18:54 So, given the amount of confusion going on, I have proposed a patch updating it with the drivers that are public and I am aware of: 16:19:03 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/711109/ 16:19:23 The rendered page is here: 16:19:25 #link https://9f709e7d1e4d7533935c-7291d6e818a7c847826cc66aee2194e8.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/711109/1/check/openstack-tox-docs/b3b7974/docs/admin/providers/index.html 16:19:54 I wanted to raise this at the meeting to see if anyone had any concerns/questions/updates for this page. 16:20:28 Many of these have been available for a few releases now... 16:20:44 I think this is a good route forward, personally... Gives a framework and examples, and then should let provider vendors themselves propose updates as they wish very easily with minimal friction 16:21:23 I'm receptive to this idea. thank you, johnsom 16:21:42 the rendered page looks good 16:22:25 Ok, thanks for the feedback. The proposal is up for review. 16:23:37 #topic Open Discussion 16:24:09 Ugh, chrome just exploded and I now have two of all of my windows..... 16:24:17 (I'm a little salty about A10 being alphabetically first above the only actually in-tree driver, but it is what it is :D) 16:24:36 Yeah, well, I wanted to be fair, so alpha sorted 16:24:42 yeah i get it 16:27:12 Other topics today? 16:27:33 nothing on my end 16:28:27 I'm really pushing hard to have the tests done this week. I will post here when I think we are ready to start reviews. There will probably be some additional clean up after I call it ready for review, but getting close to being done-ish. 16:30:38 Oh, also, I am out of office on Friday and will likely not have connectivity, so I will not be around until Monday. 16:31:48 alright, if that's it, thanks for coming ya'll, catch you next week :) 16:32:11 ataraday_: will try to look at those patches you linked today 16:32:35 #endmeeting