20:00:08 #startmeeting Octavia 20:00:10 Meeting started Wed Nov 23 20:00:08 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:14 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 20:00:20 Hi folks 20:00:26 hi 20:01:03 I'm not sure how many folks are going to join, tomorrow is a holiday in the states. 20:01:13 aha... 20:01:13 #topic Announcements 20:01:14 ok 20:01:43 Just a reminder, if you are interested in going to the PTG registration is open. 20:01:50 #link http://www.openstack.org/ptg 20:01:58 could u give me a link to it? 20:02:04 Is it a conference? 20:02:21 Also, Ocata-1 milestone has now passed and Ocata-2 is the week of December 12th 20:02:40 OK 20:03:02 I want just to update about our progress in Active-Active 20:03:11 perelman the PTG is the new "group mid-cycle" for OpenStack. They have split the Summit. There are good details on the page I linked above. 20:03:32 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 20:03:40 I had some time off the project because we had some other things and also after it we had hollidays and i took my holidays too 20:03:44 perelman Ok, now is the time! grin 20:03:45 so now i am back 20:04:17 perelman Ok, glad to have you back! 20:04:45 so I checked all the commits that u gave me comments on them and made changes it also seems that my big issue with distributor image creation is resolved 20:04:58 perelman I reviewed a few of the patches before the summit. I think there is some work to do. 20:05:02 still didnt push all the fixed things to gerrit. Tomorrow i will do it 20:05:24 yes, i went over all the comments and tried to fix things 20:05:26 perelman We decided at the summit to focus on the neutron-lbaas/octavia merge for the Ocata cycle. 20:05:39 i know, i saw the notes 20:05:53 but will it be OK still to upload the code? 20:05:54 So, our priority is going to me on the merge work. 20:06:04 perelman Yes, of course. 20:06:06 Because we have a lot of code only locally 20:06:10 ok 20:06:11 We just might be very slow to review 20:06:22 ok, I will ping :) 20:06:48 and also will try to help in reviewing neutron-lbaas/octavia 20:06:51 Of note on progress, gunicorn merged in requirements and the octavia repo 20:07:08 perelman thank you, we can use all the help we can get. 20:07:14 ok 20:07:32 I also got internally some HR to help me to push things more fast :) 20:07:36 you also need to remember on that in distributor api 20:07:48 to not use werkzeug (what a name :/) 20:07:49 Also, the TC meeting about the governance change went well. They are going to discuss it again next week. 20:08:07 Yeah, I keep forgetting the spelling. 20:08:14 not to use what? 20:08:19 I didnt understand 20:08:28 the gunicorn runner 20:08:48 we droped support for flask/werkzeug in amphora agent 20:08:50 hi guys sorry to be late 20:08:54 Also, I am working on updating our gates for xenial and merging the jobs 20:08:58 you should do the same in distributor agent 20:08:58 #https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386245/ 20:09:03 aha 20:09:05 OK 20:09:07 the DST here in Israel is to blame :) 20:09:11 nmagnezi Hi 20:09:24 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386245/ 20:09:54 Currently I am working on updating the quota patch as I found a concurrency issue with the current patchset. 20:10:21 yeah but if you was able to see 20:10:29 I removed my +2 from this patch 20:10:38 Yeah, I saw that. 20:10:39 I think that we should redesign that stuff 20:10:51 and make usage of hooks to implement that stuff 20:11:10 especially that we're working on building API v2 20:11:32 the same with pagination and sorting 20:11:39 diltram I considered the hooks approach for quotas, but I don't think it will work correctly. I think it has to be tied to the object create in the database. 20:12:09 pagination and sorting are probably good candidates for the hooks. 20:13:09 so I know that Neutron or Nova is using quota hook 20:13:15 I can't find which exactly 20:13:26 but they made it working somehow 20:14:04 Yeah, neutron is, but they are using a reservation system and I think it is synchronous where we are async. 20:14:31 I'm going down the "keep it simple" path for now. 20:15:21 +1 20:15:23 ok, sounds good 20:15:31 Any other progress updates or should we move into open discussion? 20:15:32 I was not able to take a look there how it's working 20:15:47 keystone token ready to review 20:15:52 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265065/ 20:16:04 Ajo gave -1 because he had a question about testing 20:16:11 Ok, cool. I will put that on the top of my list 20:16:17 why I'm not enabling that feature 20:16:31 Yeah, the same question I think I had 20:16:41 but this is based on our discovery that we're not getting tokens from lbaasv2 20:16:47 right 20:17:00 we will have to take that incrementally 20:17:10 exactly 20:17:41 #topic Open Discussion 20:18:08 nmagnezi I think you had a question for me 20:19:10 Maybe we lost him. 20:19:17 Any other topics today? 20:19:58 Welcome back xgerman BTW.... 20:20:08 johnsom, nop for the meeting :) 20:20:31 nmagnezi Ok, ping me after 20:20:37 thanks will be back 100% in two weeks or so ;-) 20:20:48 +1000 20:21:08 great news xgerman :) 20:21:21 Ok, if folks don't have anything else to talk about, let's wrap it up. 20:21:27 yeah, I am psyched as well. Containers are overhyped 20:21:41 BTW, I will not be online much the rest of the week due to the holiday 20:21:49 Hahaha 20:22:08 Thanks folks! 20:22:11 #endmeeting