20:00:05 #startmeeting Octavia 20:00:06 Meeting started Wed Oct 5 20:00:05 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 20:00:11 Howdy folks! 20:00:17 Hi there 20:00:27 #topic Announcements 20:00:54 I don't have any major announcements this week. Octavia is open for Ocata merge. 20:00:57 I have an announcement! 20:01:12 We are planning to have a fishbowl meeting in Barcelona 20:01:22 sbalukoff Go for it 20:01:40 Due to changes in the team I'm in at IBM, I will very, very likely be taken off of working on upstream Octavia and Neutron-LBaaS. 20:01:52 Ugh 20:01:58 I've not been told to stop working on it yet, so my goal is to get as many reviews of stuff done in the short term as I can. 20:01:59 * johnsom is sad 20:02:05 And hopefully get some code for y'all merged. 20:02:13 I have also been told I'm still going to Barcelona. 20:02:28 But you can expect there to be very little coming from my corner after Barcelona. 20:02:45 That is good. At least it won't be just Doug, Adam, and I in the design summit session 20:02:45 And if I'm totally taken off, I'll probably ask y'all to remove my core credentials. 20:03:11 Ok. Sorry to hear it. 20:03:20 In any case, I recommend we start looking at who is contributing and elect another core or two soon. 20:03:31 I hope we can make good progress on getting Act/Act in shape 20:03:45 Anyway, that's all I had to say for now. Figured y'all ought to know. 20:03:55 Yeah, we talked about that at the mid-cycle. 20:04:09 Thank you for the update. 20:04:20 Any other announcements? 20:04:38 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 20:04:47 O! 20:05:19 Ok, I have been working to get the functional tests going again. I have also been working from the back on catching up with reviews. 20:05:21 This patch is still outstanding: 20:05:25 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/380020/ 20:05:32 There are a few that I think are ready short of some minor cleanup. 20:05:43 It would be great if I could get some reviews and get to a merge-able state before I'm no longer on the project. 20:06:27 Yep, I should probably bump that forward on my list. I was working from the back in "fairness" to the older patches, but yes, there is now urgency. 20:06:46 *nod* 20:06:59 Again, my intent is to just do lots of reviews until they tell me to stop. :) 20:07:19 Yes, thank you. I am definitely in "review" mode now too 20:07:46 Ok, any other updates? 20:08:00 I think ptoohill has quotas close if not ready for review 20:08:03 Are we the only ones at this meeting? o.O 20:08:25 Oh, cool! I'll check out ptoohill's patch then. 20:08:25 I was wondering, but didn't want to know the answer..... 20:08:55 Carlos also has sorting/pagination in progress. I think he still has a few things to finish up on it 20:09:13 Is dougwig around today? 20:09:14 Ok. 20:09:20 o/ 20:09:40 Oh hey! Hi german! 20:09:44 Er... xgerman. 20:10:01 The next three items on the agenda I was hoping he could comment on. Two were carryovers he was looking into for us. 20:10:16 Aah, yes. 20:10:25 The new one is about the Go web server Dustin posted. 20:10:50 Personally I don't have a problem with it, but I know the TC has made Go a bad word, so wanted some feedback. 20:11:31 Everything is faster in GO - they are just jealous 20:11:44 I actually think having a more versatile, low-resource, simple-to-configure and standards-compliant webserver for scenario testing makes a LOT of sense. 20:11:52 +1 20:11:58 Ok, so no dougwig today. I guess we will carry those again. 20:12:12 what happened to him? hunting season? 20:12:24 Yeah. I'm just worried it is flying into the TC firestorm around go... 20:12:25 I've always disliked the netcat hack we've been using, and have suspected it for causing some of the troubleshooting issues we've had with scenario tests in the past. :/ 20:12:46 I mean, I'd take lighttpd over a netcat solution. 20:12:53 we can always use a C/C++ web server? 20:13:24 was getting a crown, now i'm just sleepy. 20:13:27 what's the deal with go? 20:13:32 xgerman: Well... we could also just use apache. But again, the nice part about Go here is it's damned simple and super-high performance (which will be useful if we get any C10k improvements in.) 20:13:44 Which is also something Dustin wants to work on in the next few weeks. :/ 20:13:54 dougwig The dentist again? Brush your teeth man.... 20:14:04 +1 20:14:07 We'd love to rub a 500k-connection demo of Octavia in the IBM managers' faces. :) 20:14:09 dougwig https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382067/3 20:14:24 sbalukoff awesome!! 20:14:48 I don't have a concern about it other than "go" has been shunned by the TC recently. Thoughts? 20:15:23 so, they said go can't be in the runtime path. that's a test. i'd say we commit it and move forward. 20:15:37 Woot! 20:15:42 Ok, cool. Yeah, it's purely test framework 20:15:57 i expect if we made a big deal of it that it might be an issue, but... i'm in ask for forgiveness mode, if it makes our tests better. 20:16:13 Yeah, I lean the same way 20:16:25 You'll hear no objections from me, eh! 20:16:31 #topic Translations 20:16:38 Any update? 20:17:25 +2 20:17:37 sorry, no update, i spaced this. *goes to write it down this time.* 20:17:57 Ok, NP 20:18:06 #topic Debian package 20:18:10 ditto. 20:18:11 How about this one? 20:18:13 Ok 20:18:27 #topic Open Discussion 20:18:34 more correctly, my feelers were returned with, "i don't know", so i need to dig deeper on the debs 20:18:37 Ok, other topics? 20:19:06 *crickets* 20:19:33 Thanks folks! See you in the main channel! 20:19:41 for a little while yet. :) 20:19:42 Ok, on that note Doug can't go sleep and we can go review! 20:19:54 #endmeeting