20:00:03 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
20:00:04 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jul 13 20:00:03 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
20:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
20:00:08 <Frito> Hello my fellow Octavia compatriots.
20:00:09 <sbalukoff> Hello!
20:00:12 <TrevorV> o/
20:00:13 <johnsom> Hi there
20:00:17 <dougwig> o/
20:00:50 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
20:00:56 <bana_k> Hi !
20:01:07 <johnsom> Just a reminder about the up coming mid-cycle
20:01:16 <johnsom> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/LbaasNewtonSprint
20:01:34 <johnsom> this is a wiki that Cody setup and links to the etherpad
20:01:47 <sbalukoff> Handy!
20:01:57 <rm_work> o/
20:02:05 <rm_work> oh hey sbalukoff is alive!
20:02:06 <johnsom> Please make sure your name is on there as he wants a list to give security.  I think we may have to use rooms in the inner area this time.
20:02:07 <rm_work> I was worried T_T
20:02:24 <sbalukoff> barely--  Been sick since coming back from vacation. I hate airports.
20:02:25 <johnsom> Yeah, I was wondering about sbalukoff myself.
20:02:38 <johnsom> +1 on hating airports
20:02:55 <rm_work> sbalukoff: don't worry, we've got a huge stack of reviews for you to +A, that's nearly as good as chicken soup
20:03:03 <sbalukoff> Hahaha!
20:03:13 <sbalukoff> Ok, I'll spend time tomorrow and Friday going through them. :)
20:03:21 <fnaval> o/
20:03:24 <rm_work> with johnsom at RAX, our multi-company cores pool is somewhat limited T_T
20:03:26 <sbalukoff> And hopefully later today, too.
20:03:31 <sbalukoff> Yeah.
20:03:42 <sbalukoff> Apologies for being unavailable, eh!
20:03:49 <johnsom> Also, there is a movement afoot to pick mascots.  We aren't technically our own project yet, but I was thinking we should submit/reserve something anyway.
20:03:49 <rm_work> sbalukoff: seriously though, for octavia there's a ton ready to go, same in neutron-lbaas
20:03:54 <rm_work> MORE in neutron-lbaas actually
20:03:58 <sbalukoff> In other news, travel to the mid-cycle was finally approved for me, so I'll definitely be there. :D
20:04:00 <johnsom> #link http://www.openstack.org/project-mascots
20:04:19 <rm_work> lol, looks like dougwig might be getting to them first
20:05:00 <johnsom> So, there is that.  If you have mascot ideas, let me know and I will send in a list and see what they say.
20:05:00 <sbalukoff> Hmmm...  any suggestions for ancient Roman animals?
20:05:22 <Frito> goats!
20:05:26 <fnaval> cortex!
20:05:27 <sbalukoff> Maybe a horse pulling a chariot?
20:05:36 <fnaval> nm
20:05:41 <rm_work> lol gotta keep it simple and rounded
20:05:45 <sbalukoff> Blah.
20:05:53 <johnsom> Oye
20:05:58 <TrevorV> wolves, bears, wild boar, deer, and goats were native to Rome
20:06:01 <Frito> goats are rounded depending on the angle you look at them at
20:06:06 <rm_work> :P
20:06:08 <dougwig> venus, with an amphora between her...
20:06:10 <fnaval> chinchilla
20:06:18 <dougwig> hands.  i meant hands.  perverts.
20:06:21 <sbalukoff> dougwig: +1
20:06:26 <rm_work> dougwig: not sure whether to -2 or +2
20:06:30 <sbalukoff> HAHA
20:06:30 <TrevorV> I say lion.  http://www.explore-italian-culture.com/images/ancient-roman-lion-mosaic.jpg
20:06:30 <johnsom> Oh dougwig....
20:06:35 <johnsom> Though, I like the idea...
20:07:07 <rm_work> I mean
20:07:13 <rm_work> I like the idea of just *an amphora*
20:07:17 <rm_work> or some amphorae
20:07:25 <johnsom> Maybe we should start a e-mail chain so we can get a list to vote on
20:07:28 <rm_work> maybe a group of like 3 amphorae, one in front and two offset behind?
20:07:35 <sbalukoff> Yeah, I could get behind an amphora.
20:07:44 <TrevorV> rm_work, yeah!  Then a big ball rolling towards them!  We invented BOWLING!!!!!!!
20:07:47 <rm_work> illustrates the HA concept
20:07:49 <fnaval> atlas
20:07:51 <sbalukoff> Woot!
20:07:52 <fnaval> the god
20:08:04 <rm_work> TrevorV: yes exactly like bowling pin layout, but just 3 of them and no ball thx :P
20:08:08 <fnaval> http://www.greekmythology.com/images/mythology/atlas_29.jpg
20:08:18 <rm_work> yeah except atlas isn't our thing anymore T_T
20:08:31 <rm_work> and complex stuff like people don't work well in the logo style :(
20:08:32 <TrevorV> atlas holding... an amphora?!
20:08:33 <fnaval> its our inside joke
20:08:49 <TrevorV> What about a scale with amphora on it?
20:08:51 * johnsom thinks he should have left this to the end....
20:08:53 <TrevorV> amphorae***
20:08:56 <TrevorV> johnsom, you right.
20:09:01 <rm_work> oh hey yeah
20:09:03 <TrevorV> With how much we like painting around here ;)
20:09:05 <Frito> so next topic?
20:09:06 <rm_work> scales with amps on them would work
20:09:14 <rm_work> but just amps might be simpler
20:09:20 <fnaval> https://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7588/1766/1600/lady%20justice.jpg
20:09:23 <rm_work> TrevorV: mockup time ;P
20:09:36 <johnsom> Please read the guidelines btw, I don't think amphora is allowed.
20:09:42 <sbalukoff> Octavia is a woman's name... so maybe a Roman woman carrying an amphora?
20:09:46 <diltram> hey
20:09:47 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
20:09:48 <TrevorV> Oh, are we sure someone isn't going to give it to their design team and steal my thunder again?!?!
20:10:01 <johnsom> Ok, moving on.  Send ideas to ML if you want
20:10:10 <TrevorV> specifically sbalukoff could you review this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339808/
20:10:13 <TrevorV> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339808/
20:10:13 <Frito> mostly internal stuff. Got a tox testing funkyness thing merged :-D
20:10:23 <sbalukoff> TrevorV: Sure.
20:10:26 <johnsom> So, as was mentioned earlier, we have a ton of reviews to do.  I tried to hit some yesterday and today.
20:10:34 <TrevorV> sbalukoff, its a very small change, but it changes l7 policy behavior
20:10:43 <sbalukoff> Aah, ok.
20:10:46 <TrevorV> I figure we can discuss in the review
20:10:58 <fnaval> my update: thanks for all the reviews - will try get to them this week!
20:11:02 <johnsom> sbalukoff I really wanted your eyes on that one too
20:11:06 <eezhova> I'd like to ask to review the functional job for lbaas, it doesn't get much attention
20:11:07 <eezhova> #link https://review.openstack.org/320999
20:11:09 <sbalukoff> I'll be spending the remainder of the week (when I'm not loopy from the dayquil) doing upstream reviews.
20:11:16 <perelman> hi
20:11:41 <TrevorV> good luck feeling better sbalukoff
20:11:46 <eezhova> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337650/
20:11:57 <johnsom> I have been working on the failover issues.  Nova had a regression introduced on the 29th that I worked with them on yesterday.  Patches are up if not merged now. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1602357
20:11:57 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1602357 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova is not marking virtual interfaces as deleted in db on instance delete" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
20:12:31 <eezhova> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338757/
20:13:00 <rm_work> IPv6 VIPs are a thing now: https://review.openstack.org/339826
20:13:07 <rm_work> #link https://review.openstack.org/339826
20:13:13 <sbalukoff> Woot!
20:13:19 <johnsom> dougwig ^^ eezhova 's patch is a stable backport
20:13:26 <sbalukoff> I'm happy to see us entering the 21st century.
20:13:44 <rm_work> sbalukoff: yes, when fixing that code I was careful to have ipv6 be the DEFAULT and ipv4 the fallback :P
20:14:14 <rm_work> functionally irrelevant but it makes me feel better
20:14:19 <dougwig> just claw back IBM's class As and ipv6 can wait another 10 years
20:14:32 <sbalukoff> Haha
20:14:42 <johnsom> or HP's for that matter
20:14:52 <sbalukoff> Yep.
20:15:10 <haleyb> hey, i heard that :)  We love our two /8's
20:15:19 <johnsom> But, that said, IPv6 is goodness
20:16:11 <johnsom> Ok, any other progress updates to discuss?
20:16:26 <rm_work> https://review.openstack.org/332704 https://review.openstack.org/340124 both havr two +2s and no +A
20:16:43 <sbalukoff> I'll put that on my list.
20:17:03 <rm_work> dougwig: need your review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317692/ updated maybe?
20:17:07 <perelman> i have uploaded another set of changes for Active-Active tpology to octavia
20:17:21 <sbalukoff> Nice!
20:17:31 <perelman> we are trying to finish uploading full version till the midcycle
20:17:31 <dougwig> rm_work: is scenario passing now?  yes, ok, will do
20:17:54 <perelman> so hopefully could introduce it in San antonio :)
20:17:55 <rm_work> perelman: are those ready for review?
20:18:02 <eezhova> One more patch adding docstrings with one +2 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336480/
20:18:17 <rm_work> perelman: i have been avoiding them (and I guess probably many others have as well?) because they are WIP and all of the tests are failing
20:18:18 <perelman> they still dont pass some tests on gerrit
20:18:30 <rm_work> so I haven't really looked at them yet
20:18:35 <perelman> but generally, any early reviews are welcome
20:19:01 <johnsom> Yeah, I hope to be able to have a look soon.
20:19:19 <johnsom> Failover issues have been keeping me busy.
20:19:25 <perelman> not all the tests failing :)
20:19:33 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
20:19:40 <perelman> yes, once we fix the tests we will remove WIP
20:19:45 <johnsom> Ok, other topics today?
20:20:10 <sbalukoff> johnsom: I think I got a notification that you included me on a talk proposal?
20:20:11 <johnsom> sbalukoff I pinged you about the summit talk.  I submitted it with you on there.
20:20:12 <sbalukoff> Thanks for that!
20:20:15 <rm_work> eezhova: done, thought i already +2'd that
20:20:46 <eezhova> rm_work, thank you!
20:21:00 <johnsom> sbalukoff Let me know if we need to change the topics or anything (though it might have closed now)
20:21:03 <perelman> who should i send the mail to about our participation in the midcycle and our topic?
20:21:09 <sbalukoff> johnsom: Thinking about what I might talk about, if active-active isn't ready, I could probably talk about installing in a non-devstack environment (especially since I think this might be one of our biggest obstacles for adoption at this time).
20:21:20 <rm_work> perelman: did you sign up on the wiki page?
20:21:37 <perelman> only wrote my username
20:21:39 <johnsom> perelman https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/LbaasNewtonSprint
20:21:45 <perelman> ok
20:21:47 <rm_work> I feel like maybe we can put some topics on there?
20:21:52 <johnsom> Please add your name, then on the etherpad I have started a topics section
20:21:53 <perelman> i will sign there
20:22:00 <rm_work> ah
20:22:03 <rm_work> topics on ehterpad, k
20:22:06 <sbalukoff> Sweet.
20:22:08 <perelman> ok
20:22:16 <johnsom> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lbaas-octavia-newton-midcycle
20:22:18 <perelman> i will add Active Active topic
20:22:40 <rm_work> I think many people aren't aware the Wiki signup page is a *different thing* than the etherpad, if you put your name on the etherpad make sure you ALSO sign up on the wiki
20:23:03 <perelman> ok, thanks!
20:23:10 <diltram> true rm_work, I didn't know
20:23:22 <johnsom> sbalukoff I think the merge, active/active, and non-devstack deployment/production topologies, maybe a show-it-works demo
20:23:32 <rm_work> yeah the wiki thing is new and isn't the normal procedure
20:23:36 <rm_work> so probably it is confusing
20:23:40 <rm_work> i expect a lot of people are unaware
20:23:49 <dougwig> nova usually uses eventbrite for the official signups, fyi.
20:23:54 <sbalukoff> johnsom: Yep. We'll have to be brief, as we'll be lucky to get through all that in one session.
20:23:56 <rm_work> yeah, so does barbican
20:24:04 <johnsom> rm_work yeah, I was just going to use our normal etherpad, but I think Cody wanted something more formal / nicer looking
20:24:06 <sbalukoff> Or, concise, I mean.
20:24:11 <rm_work> johnsom: yeah
20:24:23 <TrevorV> rm_work, I was unaware... lulz
20:24:34 <rm_work> lol, looking at gerrit, prepare for merge-pocalypse :P
20:24:43 <rm_work> TrevorV: yeah i think cody must have added you when he made it
20:24:45 <sbalukoff> Haha!
20:24:46 <TrevorV> Hopefully nothing gets in through the cracks ;)
20:25:01 <johnsom> sbalukoff Yes, just ideas at this point.  I put the merge as a topic on the abstract though
20:25:07 <sbalukoff> yeah, I'll get going on that later today (after shaking this headache) and throughout the rest of the week.
20:25:40 <johnsom> We have time...
20:26:15 <sbalukoff> Oh, sorry, misunderstood.
20:26:27 <sbalukoff> (I'm a bit loopy today...  sorry about that.)
20:26:39 <johnsom> Ok, anything else to discuss?
20:27:00 <johnsom> There has been some talk/action on the DVR/AAP/FIP RFE/bug.
20:27:20 <johnsom> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1583694
20:27:20 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1583694 in neutron "[RFE] DVR support for Allowed_address_pair port that are bound to multiple ACTIVE VM ports" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan)
20:27:34 <johnsom> Feel free to comment as well if you plan to use FIPs and DVR
20:28:19 <johnsom> Ok then.  A nice short meeting today.
20:28:25 <sbalukoff> Thanks folks!
20:28:27 <johnsom> Going once....
20:28:40 * Frito resists the urge to bring up goat mascots again
20:28:44 <johnsom> #endmeeting