20:00:03 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
20:00:03 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 27 20:00:03 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00:04 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
20:00:06 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
20:00:08 <TrevorV> o/
20:00:10 <fnaval> o/
20:00:12 <johnsom> Hi folks
20:00:21 <ajmiller> hi
20:00:23 <johnsom> Welcome back fnaval
20:00:23 <bana_k> hello
20:00:24 <xgerman> o/
20:00:26 <fnaval> thanks johnsom
20:00:31 <minwang2> o/
20:00:36 <johnsom> Sorry we missed you at the mid-cycle
20:00:57 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
20:01:00 <fnaval> ah yeah just be a couple days unfortunately - looks like lots of testing tasks to do
20:01:04 <xgerman> johnsom +1
20:01:25 <xgerman> fnaval yep —
20:01:30 <sbalukoff> Greetings, folks!
20:01:36 <johnsom> Ok, we have some patches that are still in need of review.  These are slowing folks down or have impact on multiple patches, so reviews are needed:
20:01:47 <johnsom> Updates the failover flow for active/standby
20:01:51 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/253724
20:01:56 <johnsom> Shared pools support
20:02:00 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/256369
20:02:05 <johnsom> Add spec for active-active
20:02:11 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/234639
20:02:17 <johnsom> Horizon panels
20:02:22 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard+status:open
20:02:36 <sbalukoff> johnsom: Sorry I didn't get to the active/standby scenarios I wanted to test yet. I should still be able to do that this week.
20:02:37 <johnsom> Lots of good work happening on the horizon panels
20:02:46 <sbalukoff> +1
20:02:48 <xgerman> +1
20:03:11 <johnsom> sbalukoff Thanks!  It touches a number of things and I think there are some patches that could conflict
20:03:29 <johnsom> So, getting it landed sooner is good for all
20:03:33 <sbalukoff> Thanks to those of you who've reviewed the shared pools stuff so far!  (I'm really hoping to get a +2 here soonish. ;) )
20:03:44 <TrevorV> johnsom my bug fix has conflicts with it, so whoever's lands first... :P
20:03:58 <sbalukoff> johnsom: Yep, it's another big, important patch (the active-standby one)
20:04:08 <johnsom> Anyway, wanted to highlight those.  Any other announcements?
20:04:43 <rm_work> o/
20:04:44 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports
20:05:12 <sbalukoff> Things are going well with the shared pools stuff. Found a couple bugs thanks to testers and those have been patched.
20:05:17 <TrevorV> I have a couple reviews that need some attention.  They're bug-fixes from the mid-cycle that I was supposed to complete
20:05:24 <TrevorV> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267137
20:05:27 <minwang2> Implements: blueprint anti-affinity https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272344/2
20:05:28 <johnsom> Ok, so I have been trying to get through the review backlog, but slowed down by a cold I picked up between the two mid-cycles and preparing for an internal Octavia security review.
20:05:29 <minwang2> still wip
20:05:31 <TrevorV> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271512
20:05:38 <sbalukoff> As a reminder, this is where I'm tracking progress for the L7 work (that needs to get in before feature freeze. ;) )
20:05:41 <sbalukoff> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lbaas-l7-todo-list
20:06:16 <fnaval> I'm working on setting up octavia Tempest scenario test
20:06:18 <fnaval> #link https://review.openstack.org/172199
20:06:22 <TrevorV> I'm currently looking through the first L7 review, and working my way up the chain sbalukoff
20:06:22 <rm_work> yeah, I have a whole browser window just full of reviews I need to look at for Octavia, but I have an internal release going out next week so I've been a bit distracted :( testing is wrapping up so I'll try to get to those today or tomorrow
20:06:32 <TrevorV> Then I'll probably test them by deploying them as you suggested
20:06:35 <sbalukoff> fnaval: Thanks! That's going to be really important, I think. :)
20:06:55 <fnaval> thanks for the quick review turnaround sbalukoff and phil!
20:07:07 <xgerman> I have been working on getting all those enterprise features in… trying to deploy on a real cloud ;-)
20:07:22 <sbalukoff> xgerman: Great!
20:07:23 <johnsom> fnaval Yes, thank you.  I really hope we can get back on track with the testing.  We just need to get things setup and a few examples to get other folks involved.
20:07:32 <minwang2> +1
20:07:46 <fnaval> johnsom: yep - will hopefully be full steam ahead by next week
20:07:49 <xgerman> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271476/ will be hot again once I fix it up
20:08:16 <xgerman> and Aish has https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272861/ which needs some attention
20:08:28 <johnsom> I am going to skip the bug review today as we all have some much going on with reviews and such.
20:08:31 <bana_k> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/1534223
20:08:33 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1534223 in octavia "compile_amphora_details hardcodes topology as consts.TOPOLOGY_SINGLE" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Banashankar (bkalebe)
20:08:37 <xgerman> and #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272747/
20:09:04 <johnsom> Also, I think I am getting closer to fixing the bug where we are building the amp image for the api tests.  So, that will speed them up.
20:09:05 <bana_k> was working on it but I need to see how handle the pre spawned AMPs in case of topology change
20:09:28 <sbalukoff> johnsom: Yay!
20:10:17 <sbalukoff> Wow, it actually sounds like this group is trucking along nicely instead of our usual slacker pace. ;)
20:10:21 <johnsom> Great progress folks.
20:10:31 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
20:10:47 <johnsom> Any other topics folks would like to discuss?
20:11:11 <xgerman> another plug for alpine linux
20:11:24 <sbalukoff> What is alpine linux?
20:11:25 <johnsom> I could mention the Kosmos mid-cycle.  We started landing some code.  It's good to get that going.
20:11:30 <xgerman> #link http://www.alpinelinux.org
20:11:34 <sbalukoff> johnsom: Sweet!
20:11:38 <xgerman> might be good for light weight devstack amphora
20:11:47 <xgerman> johnsom +1
20:12:04 <sbalukoff> xgerman: Oh? And possibly a lightweight production one as well?
20:12:06 <johnsom> Intel's clear linux could be interesting too.
20:12:30 <xgerman> yeah, wish I had the cycles to play around with that
20:12:34 <sbalukoff> Definitely worth considering anything that reduces the footprint of our amphorae.
20:12:52 <SamYaple> +1 plug for alpine
20:12:54 <johnsom> Yeah, sadly Ubunutu's cloud image is a big bloated
20:12:56 <xgerman> sbalukoff +1
20:12:59 * SamYaple goes back to lurking
20:13:56 <xgerman> it seems we are done even before blogan woke up...
20:14:01 <sbalukoff> Wow, 14 minute meeting? Excellent!
20:14:04 <johnsom> Ok, well, if there aren't any other hot topics.....  Please try to make time for reviews!
20:14:06 <blogan> oh god
20:14:22 <blogan> i need meetingbot to just ping me from now on when these meetings start
20:14:33 <xgerman> lol
20:14:36 <sbalukoff> blogan: Did you have something to discuss?
20:14:52 <blogan> sbalukoff: nope nothing
20:15:00 <johnsom> Maybe I will be motivated to ping people...
20:15:12 <TrevorV> johnsom were you saying you're not going to review the bug-fixes I mentioned due to other priorities?  Just curious if I read that right above, not going to object
20:15:17 <johnsom> Before it starts though, so you can't pad your attendance records...  grin
20:15:18 <blogan> johnsom: are you meetingbot incarnate?
20:15:23 <sbalukoff> Cool. I can get back to running this scenario test in a loop hoping to trigger that damned session_persistence intermittent bug...
20:15:41 <evgenyf> hi
20:15:48 <xgerman> hi
20:15:51 <minwang2> hi
20:15:55 <sbalukoff> hi!
20:15:57 <blogan> sbalukoff: with your proposed fix for it or just tryign to get it to show up normally?
20:16:13 <johnsom> TrevorV I'm not saying I *won't* just given the backlog and this security review, not sure how far I can get this week.
20:16:16 <sbalukoff> blogan: Trying to reproduce the error reliably before I write the fix for it.
20:16:21 <TrevorV> johnsom yeah that'
20:16:25 <evgenyf> Just connected, guys. Did you already discussed L7?
20:16:28 <TrevorV> that's what I assumed, just a deprioritization
20:16:36 <blogan> sbalukoff: okay good, of course not good for you bc those are PITA
20:16:36 <sbalukoff> blogan: If that doesn't work locally, I'll just start taking shots in the dark at gerrit. :P
20:16:39 <johnsom> I still owe sbalukoff the rest of the reviews I have started on his stuff.
20:16:42 <sbalukoff> (On a separate review)
20:16:55 <blogan> sbalukoff: gerrit deserves dark shots
20:17:02 <sbalukoff> Indeed!
20:17:09 <blogan> maybe haproxy has a bug!
20:17:38 <xgerman> also I should mention I submitted an Octavia lab talk. Ping me if you like to help
20:17:50 <johnsom> evgenyf We just touched on the need for reviews.  Did you have another topic?
20:18:01 <rm_work> xgerman: I can probably help again
20:18:04 <sbalukoff> blogan: Unlikely, though it has occurred to me that it is perhaps the nature in which we're restarting it... in which case a delay of 1 second at opportune moments during that test would fix the error.
20:18:08 <xgerman> coolio
20:18:32 <rm_work> though I can't be in charge of the USBs again because I will be on PTO the week before the summit O_o
20:18:43 <evgenyf> no, just wanted to say that I commited L7 with Stephen's review issues
20:19:02 <evgenyf> and I'm very close to finish the CLI stuff for L7
20:19:19 <evgenyf> Next: tempest
20:19:27 <johnsom> evgenyf Excellent!
20:19:31 <rm_work> evgenyf: ah I need to check with you (maybe after the meeting) about the concerns you had on the TLS refactoring stuff that we ended up merging
20:19:32 <sbalukoff> evgenyf: Cool! If you can put pressure on whoever is appropriate to get the Neutron-LBaaS shared pool patch merged, that will bring us closer to being able to merge your L7 review.
20:19:36 <xgerman> rm_work I think we will avoid usb sticks (I hope)
20:19:41 <rm_work> kk
20:19:53 <evgenyf> will try
20:20:38 <evgenyf> I have posted some question on L7 review regarding comparison types
20:21:07 <xgerman> rm_work added you
20:21:16 <evgenyf> will appreaciate your opinion, and BTW, I added invert option
20:21:34 <sbalukoff> evgenyf: Great! I'll try to respond to your question soon.
20:21:53 <evgenyf> Thanks!
20:21:57 <johnsom> Ok.  If there isn't anything else I will give you all 38 minutes to work on reviews...  grin
20:22:04 <sbalukoff> Danke!
20:22:15 <evgenyf> got some reviews from Akihiro on CLIE, working on it
20:22:23 <evgenyf> CLI*
20:22:38 <sbalukoff> Yep, he's commented on my shared pools CLI review as well.
20:23:01 <evgenyf> Yeah, many similar comments )
20:23:46 <johnsom> Thanks!
20:23:49 <johnsom> #endmeeting