20:00:31 <xgerman> #startmeeting octavia
20:00:31 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jul  8 20:00:31 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is xgerman. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00:32 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
20:00:35 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
20:00:38 <dougwig> o/
20:00:39 <xgerman> #chair blogan
20:00:39 <openstack> Current chairs: blogan xgerman
20:00:42 <madhu_ak> o/
20:00:55 <sbalukoff> Howdy, howdy!
20:01:00 <blogan> hola
20:01:00 <rm_work> o/
20:01:00 <sballe> o/
20:01:04 <xgerman> #topic Announcements
20:01:16 <xgerman> we will talk midccyel in a bit
20:01:37 <xgerman> GSLB draft: #link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nw5jVn0hjmhlhkZJAohx-gqRkkbVhMMJ79Pogd0ysEk/edit?usp=sharing
20:01:41 <sherif> hello
20:01:57 <xgerman> sherif is the new HP intern working on active-standby amphora
20:02:05 <ptoohill> o/
20:02:09 <blogan> ah nice to meet you sherif
20:02:38 <sherif> nice to meet you blogan
20:02:53 <xgerman> so global load balancing pout out a draft and is awaiting comments + suggestions
20:04:13 <xgerman> I think flavor framework got mestery’s attention and is now moving at light speed
20:04:26 <madhu_ak> +!
20:04:29 <madhu_ak> +1
20:04:33 <mestery> xgerman: YEs indeed!
20:04:37 <sballe> great
20:04:38 <mestery> I'm keen to see it merged, so reviewing it, testing it, etc.
20:04:41 <mestery> Thanks to madhu_ak for his work here
20:04:47 <xgerman> +1
20:04:58 <madhu_ak> glad to collaborate!
20:05:10 <dougwig> let's aim to merge that during the midcycle (or sooner)
20:05:18 <xgerman> +1
20:05:28 <madhu_ak> new oatch is on the way for flavor
20:05:36 <madhu_ak> s/oatch/patch
20:06:04 <xgerman> cool
20:06:35 <xgerman> dougwig any announcements?
20:07:23 <xgerman> ok, moving on
20:07:32 <xgerman> #topic Midcycle Topic focusing
20:07:47 <xgerman> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/LBaaS-FWaaS-VPNaaS_Summer_Midcycle_meetup
20:07:48 <blogan> methinks dougwig put this up, but it is ag ood idea
20:08:03 <xgerman> yep, good idea +1
20:08:06 <blogan> we've got a lot of topics to go through and there's no way we're going to address them all
20:08:11 <dougwig> we had a *BUNCH* of potential topics in the etherpad. can we narrow that down to 5 or 6 items that we expect to sprint on and nail?
20:08:18 <blogan> at least get them all done, might be some high level discussion
20:08:22 <dougwig> i started with a few from neutron-lbaas and fwaas
20:09:01 <blogan> agree with the neutron-lbaas topics
20:09:24 <xgerman> yeah, I am curious who is doing L& those days
20:09:27 <xgerman> L7
20:09:55 <dougwig> evgeny, i think.
20:10:11 <blogan> yeah we'll probably have to look at the review up and see what work still remains
20:10:13 <dougwig> can someone volunteer to cut the octavia list down?  or suggest the most important here?
20:10:28 <dougwig> clearly, it's all about the SSH driver.  :)
20:10:35 <sbalukoff> Haha
20:11:16 <blogan> well i think reworking the drivers and making the controller worker pluggable is important to me, but that can just be a high level discussion and be implemented in off peaktimes
20:11:52 <xgerman> I think we need to spend time at the summit to figure out the list of things we need to hit for the ref driver goal
20:12:25 <dougwig> +1
20:12:28 <ptoohill> Ive sorta worked on a pluggable controller worker for the containers stuff we are working on
20:13:01 <xgerman> yeah, we will need the same for active-passive
20:13:23 <dougwig> if we can aim to break into 4-5 groups that are working together, that usually works pretty well at the other sprints i've been to.
20:13:33 <xgerman> I know johnsom wants to work on housekeeping and health manager
20:13:46 <xgerman> dougwig, sounds good
20:13:55 <xgerman> we are a big enough crowd
20:13:58 <blogan> yeah trevor can work with johnsomon that
20:14:06 <blogan> yeah this is a huge crowd
20:14:55 <dougwig> if we aim at 5-6 topics, with a point person for each, then we can open the session with either a group conversation (cough, fwaas), or point at who folks can rally around for whatever they're interesting in working on.
20:15:56 <dougwig> interestED.  tense fail.
20:17:10 <sbalukoff> Are we just looking for someone to name those 5-6 topics?
20:17:36 <blogan> well neutron-lbaas has l7, flavors, and octavia as ref driver
20:17:39 <sbalukoff> Why don't people who want to work on a specific thing volunteer to lead that sub-group?
20:17:49 <sballe> Should we prioritize them? I am assumign some topics are more important than others
20:17:59 <xgerman> +1
20:18:04 <sballe> sbalukoff: +1
20:18:25 <blogan> restructuring flows and the pluggable controller worker can be merged
20:18:33 <sbalukoff> I think the Octavia as reference driver is an important goal-- but I'm reluctant to try to lead anything just yet after having come back after a 6-month hiatus.
20:18:47 <blogan> doug should lead that one
20:18:50 <xgerman> +1
20:18:52 <blogan> voluntold
20:18:56 <sbalukoff> HAHA
20:19:00 <sbalukoff> Congrats, Doug!
20:19:27 <dougwig> uh oh, what did i get?
20:19:28 <sbalukoff> I'm up for taking a stab at L7 if nobody else here is more qualified / engaged in it.
20:19:42 <blogan> works for me
20:19:46 <sbalukoff> dougwig: You're going to deliver v1.0 next week.
20:19:47 <rm_work> sbalukoff: you still need to finish up all your old reviews too :P
20:19:52 <dougwig> ha.
20:19:53 <sbalukoff> ALL of it. On you.
20:20:01 <xgerman> rm_work +1
20:20:03 <sbalukoff> rm_work: Pshaw!
20:20:07 * dougwig books tickets to Hawaii.
20:20:15 <xgerman> and we now have a y34 gate
20:20:19 <xgerman> py34
20:20:25 <sbalukoff> Yay?
20:20:50 <blogan> housekeeping service can be led by johnsom/TrevorV
20:20:56 <rm_work> yay for living in the present instead of the past! :P
20:21:14 <xgerman> brogan +1
20:21:21 <sbalukoff> rm_work: py27 will never die, man.
20:21:36 <sbalukoff> It's immortal. Like that one species of jellyfish.
20:22:00 <blogan> ok my top 3 octavia topics in no order are 1) flows/controller worker 2) housekeeping 3) different drivers discussion
20:22:12 <blogan> active/standby would be a nice to have
20:22:24 <blogan> not sure if we'll be able to get to it though with someof the technical debt we have
20:22:26 <xgerman> well, if it doesn’t happen sherif failed
20:22:32 <blogan> lol
20:22:33 <rm_work> no pressure sherif
20:22:58 <sherif> yeh appears so :)
20:24:01 <xgerman> brogan what about health?
20:24:05 <xgerman> blogan
20:24:32 <blogan> well i'm kind of lumping that in with housekeeping i suppose, it is different though
20:24:53 <xgerman> it has it’s own name :-)
20:25:02 <blogan> okay so 3) health manager
20:25:04 <xgerman> but lumping works for me
20:25:23 <blogan> pretty sure health amnager and housekeeping will have a lot of discussions together
20:25:28 <blogan> people who do it
20:25:30 <sbalukoff> health monitoring is something likely to trigger housekeeping tasks.
20:25:33 <rm_work> apparently this is a thing: http://i.imgur.com/sy4OoNR.png
20:25:43 <sbalukoff> They're kind of joined at the hip.
20:25:44 <xgerman> lol
20:25:56 <blogan> rm_work: nice attempt at derailing a productive meeting
20:26:06 <xgerman> enriching
20:26:18 <xgerman> sbalukoff +1
20:26:25 <sbalukoff> blogan: Holy moly! Since when did this group start having those?
20:26:33 <blogan> okay im going to update the etherpad with that 3/4 items
20:26:37 <sbalukoff> You leave for half a year, people...
20:26:40 <blogan> unless there is mass disagreement
20:26:47 <rm_work> sounds good
20:26:48 <sbalukoff> blogan: Go for it.
20:26:51 <xgerman> +1
20:28:13 <dougwig> if anyone else has input, put it in the etherpad.  if we don't have volunteer point people by the end of the week, we'll assign some.  :)
20:28:22 <xgerman> yep
20:28:28 <sbalukoff> +1
20:28:43 <xgerman> now with bogan picking up volunteering that shouldn’t be a problem
20:29:06 <blogan> voluntelling
20:29:07 * xgerman thinks next mistype will be hogan
20:29:15 <blogan> or brogan
20:29:34 <dougwig> towgan
20:29:47 <blogan> that name has run its course
20:29:54 <xgerman> #topic Brief progress reports
20:30:47 <blogan> ive got reviews in flight that i don't want to merge/change until midcycle decisions are made :)
20:31:11 <blogan> othert han rebasing from rm_work py34 crusade
20:31:30 <rm_work> heh
20:31:58 <dougwig> i kind of feel like rm_work can crusade on anything.  like brushing his teeth.
20:32:09 <blogan> no truer words have ever been said
20:32:11 <dougwig> sorry, OT.
20:32:14 <rm_work> :P
20:32:20 <xgerman> yeah, any updates on the gate tasks form last week? mwang2; madu_ak
20:32:22 <rm_work> What can I say, I get things done.
20:32:43 <blogan> i think we have different definitions of crusade
20:32:52 <ptoohill> I have a couple things out and coming for RS containers work. The TLS hook up stuff I did could use some reviews to get in, in both octavia and n-lbaas. Think one of them is only being picky about using os.join for a test string.
20:33:03 <madhu_ak> am yet to start the gate task xgerman, caught up more work internally and working on flavor stuffs
20:33:24 <rm_work> yeah, would like to get ptoohill's TLS stuff merged
20:33:31 <madhu_ak> xgerman, that is the next task to do
20:33:47 <xgerman> ptoohill - I will try to look at it
20:33:51 <ptoohill> Thank you
20:34:06 <xgerman> I also think dougwig’s Octavia driver needs some love
20:34:21 <ptoohill> We need to get the driver updated for subnet_id
20:34:30 <dougwig> is that noted in the review?
20:34:38 <ptoohill> Not yet i dont think
20:34:40 <blogan> it will be soon
20:34:49 <dougwig> i've got two people's feedback to incorporate. i can hit that at the same time.  please add?
20:35:02 <ptoohill> ill add
20:35:46 <xgerman> I am also curious about cc32’s health work — van we get a WIP?
20:35:50 <blogan> ptoohill: already added
20:36:01 <xgerman> ctc32
20:36:03 <xgerman> crc32
20:36:05 <blogan> xgerman: he's working on it as we speak
20:36:10 <xgerman> cool
20:36:47 <blogan> xgerman: it'll probably be crude at first, but it can be cleaned up during the midcycle, ill make sure he gets a review up ebfore the midcycle though
20:36:56 <ptoohill> well i pressed button before i seen that ><
20:37:16 <xgerman> yeah, I just like to see the direction...
20:38:01 <blogan> xgerman: understandable
20:39:07 <xgerman> moving on?
20:39:15 * blogan thinks we're done?
20:39:21 <xgerman> #topic Open Discussion
20:39:35 <dougwig> move to adjourn.
20:39:43 <sbalukoff> Heh!
20:39:47 <sbalukoff> One quick thing:
20:39:48 <sballe> bye!
20:39:57 <sbalukoff> http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=86319369&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
20:40:13 <sbalukoff> Progress with the trademark. U.S. government is slow, but things are still on track there.
20:40:24 <ptoohill> nice
20:40:52 <xgerman> +1
20:40:52 <sbalukoff> Also, thanks xgerman for his vbrownbag talk at the Vancouver summit. I totally used that as proof that "Octavia" is being used in commerce. :D
20:40:54 <sballe> cool. sbalukoff are you going to give this trademark to the Openstack Foundation?
20:41:01 <sbalukoff> sballe: Yes.
20:41:02 <sballe> or will IBM own the name>
20:41:05 <sballe> O cool!
20:41:49 <sbalukoff> No, part of the clarification paperwork I ended up filling out about this during the acquisition is that it's slated to be handed over to the Openstack Foundation as soon as the latter is ready to take it over.
20:42:24 <sbalukoff> That's all I have.
20:42:26 <sbalukoff> Adjourn?
20:42:34 <dougwig> it's IBM, so i'm guessing you have to notarize your used TP to get that closed.
20:42:49 <sbalukoff> Haha.
20:43:01 <rm_work> good meeting then
20:43:11 <xgerman> ok
20:43:14 <rm_work> see most of you in Seattle?
20:43:15 <xgerman> #endmeeting