16:30:07 <tjones> #startmeeting NovaBugScrub
16:30:08 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar 12 16:30:07 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tjones. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:30:09 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:30:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'novabugscrub'
16:30:28 <tjones> Hi - anyone here today?
16:31:03 <tjones> *listens to crickets*
16:31:08 <alexpilotti> tjones: hi
16:31:21 <alexpilotti> just joined!
16:31:21 <melwitt> hello
16:31:26 <tjones> phew - thought i was all alone today
16:31:31 <alexpilotti> heh
16:31:33 <tjones> with the time change - i was confused
16:32:03 <tjones> #topic tagging
16:32:04 <alexpilotti> yeah, this week is crazy, as here in EU we're still on winter time
16:32:09 <tjones> lets do tagging first
16:32:21 <tjones> we have 29
16:32:28 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1285288
16:32:35 <tjones> not sure if this is testing or docs?
16:33:00 <tjones> and the last comment says it does not affect ci - so ???
16:34:15 <tjones> ideas?
16:34:31 <johnthetubaguy1> maybe its fixed now? not sure
16:34:40 <tjones> me either
16:34:44 <tjones> i'll comment and close?
16:34:45 <melwitt> looks like something wrong with test dependency version?
16:35:20 <johnthetubaguy1> needs more info maybe, like, does it still break?
16:35:33 <tjones> ok incomplete and commented
16:35:58 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1286257
16:36:11 <tjones> libvirt
16:36:19 <wendar> (struggling with train network, but here)
16:36:44 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1286297
16:37:29 <tjones> fix already proposed
16:37:47 <tjones> no idea where to put this….  conductor?
16:38:14 <tjones> fix is in dashboards….  so console?
16:41:33 <tjones> im moving on in the interest of time.  #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1286297
16:41:37 <wendar> it seems we need a category for horizon
16:41:45 <wendar> but, compute might do just as well
16:41:57 <tjones> wendar: would console fit the bill?
16:42:09 <melwitt> I thought compute
16:42:19 <wendar> console is for nova-console
16:42:28 <tjones> ok compute it is
16:42:52 <wendar> and, whoever looks at this will have to dig down into compute, so... yeah, makes sense
16:42:58 <tjones> next one looks like volume to me https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1286297
16:43:08 <wendar> isn't that the same one again?
16:43:18 <tjones> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1287622
16:43:20 <tjones> heh
16:43:24 <tjones> sorry
16:44:03 <melwitt> I agree volumes
16:44:20 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1288214 - guessing cells
16:45:08 <melwitt> api
16:45:26 <tjones> melwitt: not cells?  just learning
16:46:17 <tjones> ah - i see the log line attach the Nova API
16:47:12 <tjones> ok next one does look to me like we need a horizon tag #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1288230
16:48:11 <wendar> could be compute, with an "affects" for Horizon
16:48:44 <tjones> done
16:49:04 <tjones> this one i thought network but now i am thinking compute #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1288392
16:49:27 <tjones> compute not handling neutron outtage nicely
16:49:36 <melwitt> I think compute too
16:49:58 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1288609
16:50:04 <tjones> network
16:50:47 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1288700
16:51:22 <tjones> this one is odd
16:53:24 <wendar> compute or api?
16:54:07 <tjones> almost looks like a wierd env issue
16:54:15 <tjones> i'll put compute i guess
16:54:29 <johnthetubaguy1> its api I think
16:54:40 <melwitt> you can put api too. error is coming from api log
16:54:46 <johnthetubaguy1> sounds like its not doing some checking for Non correctly
16:54:54 <melwitt> or api code
16:54:55 <tjones> ok put them both
16:55:18 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1289036
16:56:05 <tjones> again thought network but think now compute
16:56:09 <melwitt> compute probably
16:56:25 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1289135
16:56:26 <wendar> I'd go for compute
16:56:26 <tjones> volumes
16:56:33 <tjones> or api
16:56:40 <tjones> for the one above
16:56:44 <wendar> (time delay, that was for #1289036)
16:56:53 <johnthetubaguy1> 1289036 is libvirt I think
16:57:08 <johnthetubaguy1> fails to unplug, then blows up
16:57:11 <melwitt> api
16:57:55 <tjones> oops - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1289135
16:57:56 <tjones> vmware
16:58:06 <tjones> blush
16:58:10 <tjones> thought i already got those
16:58:30 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1290362
16:58:39 <tjones> libvirt
16:59:02 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1290362
16:59:18 <tjones> volumes
16:59:39 <tjones> lets pause a minute and talk abut RC bugs
16:59:54 <wendar> nods
16:59:58 <tjones> i didn't do anything about scheduling more of these meetings - i didn't get any response at all from the ML
17:00:14 <tjones> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-rc1
17:00:21 <tjones> RC bugs don't look terribly bad (to me)
17:00:36 <tjones> there are 14 and they seem to be moving
17:01:23 <tjones> i don't have timestamps on them (need to run my script) but perhaps this can be managed simply by pinging the owners if they are not moving them along
17:01:40 <tjones> thoughts?
17:04:25 <melwitt> you mean your script checks the time since gerrit review associated with bug was updated or?
17:04:37 <tjones> yes
17:04:49 <johnthetubaguy1> russellb has been checking on those and keeping the list short
17:05:10 <tjones> is there anything that i can do in addition to help him out?
17:05:13 <johnthetubaguy1> I do wonder if there are any critical issue that we don't know about, but have been reported
17:05:25 <johnthetubaguy1> but not seen anything myself
17:06:00 <tjones> IMO we have to depend on the tag owners of the tags to bring that to our attention by prioritizing correctly.
17:06:12 <johnthetubaguy1> that bug about the hypervisor list not working could be one of those
17:06:26 <johnthetubaguy1> tjones: do the tag owners know they are meant to be doing that?
17:06:44 <tjones> i did tell them in the ML - but i could send them a personal message ;-)
17:06:57 <johnthetubaguy1> the ML has _a lot_ of traffic
17:07:15 <tjones> yes - very true
17:07:29 <tjones> i'll send a personal message - then we know they know
17:08:00 <melwitt> I've been out sick the past week since last meeting, so I'll be going through my tags
17:08:11 <tjones> hope you are better
17:08:17 <melwitt> I am, thanks
17:09:30 <tjones> ok - 12 more - shall we continue knocking them out?
17:09:50 <wendar> I've got 30 more minutes free
17:09:59 <tjones> im doing 2 meetings at once ;-)
17:10:05 <wendar> :)
17:10:14 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1290642
17:10:45 <tjones> test issue ?
17:10:55 <tjones> i mean an issue with the way the tests are written?
17:11:37 <wendar> testing is a good place to start
17:11:55 <wendar> it'll require some confirmation, and may be bounced to compute or something else
17:12:02 <tjones> ja
17:12:13 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1290660
17:12:24 <tjones> db
17:12:33 <wendar> yeah
17:12:44 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1290767
17:12:45 <tjones> network
17:13:12 <tjones> or compute
17:13:18 <wendar> maybe api?
17:13:23 <tjones> lol
17:13:34 <wendar> it's not a bug in neutron
17:13:48 <wendar> but, the api needs some error code handling to retry?
17:13:55 <tjones> sounds right
17:14:02 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1290772
17:14:21 <tjones> not sure what matchmaker is
17:14:35 <melwitt> it's a zeromq thing I thought
17:14:35 <wendar> maybe console
17:14:59 <wendar> console and conductor
17:15:13 <wendar> they're affected by it, anyway
17:15:14 <tjones> ok trying that
17:15:39 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291100
17:16:06 <tjones> uh oh - regression?
17:16:30 <tjones> maybe something we need to have in rc?
17:16:35 <wendar> ruh-roh
17:17:07 <wendar> yeah, worth raising for russellb's review
17:17:12 <tjones> #action bring https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291100 to russell's attention
17:17:19 <wendar> also, compute
17:17:36 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291100
17:17:45 <tjones> sorry
17:17:46 <tjones> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291127
17:18:07 <wendar> volumes
17:18:25 <tjones> yep
17:18:29 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291163
17:18:44 <tjones> libvirt
17:19:03 <wendar> nods
17:19:09 <tjones> that's not a valid mac addr
17:19:13 <tjones> is it?
17:19:25 <wendar> it's really, really not
17:19:29 <tjones> yeah
17:19:35 <tjones> so ??  invalid
17:20:16 <wendar> Yeah, if the reporter has some additional information they can respond to the invalid.
17:20:24 <tjones> yeah ok
17:20:43 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291246
17:20:50 <johnthetubaguy1> well, seems like neutron should validate the max
17:20:51 <tjones> here's another we may want to show russell
17:20:52 <johnthetubaguy1> mac
17:21:05 <tjones> johnthetubaguy1: true - could be a nicer error msg
17:21:20 <johnthetubaguy1> tjones: well, port create should fail I think
17:21:35 <melwitt> he's saying neutron allows creation of a port with '123' mac address but then nova can't use it. which is not a nova problem imo
17:21:56 <johnthetubaguy1> right, its a neutron error checking issue
17:21:59 <melwitt> and agree
17:22:09 <tjones> ok back to neutron and reopened
17:22:10 <johnthetubaguy1> I mean api validation, but you get the idea
17:22:24 <tjones> yes
17:22:26 <melwitt> yeah
17:22:41 <wendar> fair enough, but more a feature request than a bug, so probably next cycle
17:22:45 <tjones> back to the race - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291246
17:22:52 <johnthetubaguy1> 1291246 is nothing new really
17:23:21 <johnthetubaguy1> oh hang on
17:23:27 <johnthetubaguy1> maybe they forgot the correct value here
17:24:23 <melwitt> compute I guess
17:24:39 <johnthetubaguy1> its a db thing really, well an objects and db thing
17:24:46 <melwitt> or api. not sure where this code is. oh
17:25:07 <tjones> so objects db and api?
17:25:18 <johnthetubaguy1> just objects and db
17:25:36 <tjones> TWO MORE
17:25:44 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291471
17:26:01 <tjones> volume
17:26:13 <wendar> whoot! (2 more)
17:26:26 <wendar> and, agreed
17:26:31 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291489
17:26:37 <tjones> network
17:26:56 <tjones> or api
17:27:16 <wendar> leaning toward api
17:27:23 <tjones> me too
17:27:35 <melwitt> same
17:27:46 <tjones> ok we are DONE with tagging
17:27:55 <wendar> huzzah!
17:28:12 <tjones> the only bug we think may be a rc candidate is https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291100
17:28:45 <melwitt> what about the objects and db thing
17:28:49 <tjones> anything else we can/should do to help with rc bugs other than my sending a personal note to each tag owner making sure they know they need to raise up critical bugs?
17:29:13 <wendar> we may want to review the tags with no owners in this group
17:29:19 <wendar> (next week)
17:29:28 <tjones> ok tags with no owners is HUGE
17:29:43 <tjones> i have a speadsheet i can share (google doc) with you
17:29:58 <tjones> i need to scrub it some more - but it is daunting
17:30:06 <wendar> looks like all the official tags have owners now, that's good
17:30:11 <tjones> yes they do
17:30:34 <wendar> well done, tjones :)
17:30:47 <tjones> i have a list of bugs with no official tag on them that we can go over - maybe start by date opened (earliest 1st)
17:30:53 <wendar> and, sure I'd be happy to look over the spreadsheet
17:31:11 <wendar> it'll give me some focus for between-meeting triage
17:31:17 <tjones> wendar: thanks.  I'll send it to you folks.  anything else today?
17:31:35 <tjones> i should really attend this other meeting but i wanted to get through this list today
17:31:49 <wendar> off you go, then
17:31:50 <tjones> #action send out bugs with no official tags list
17:31:51 <wendar> and thanks!
17:31:53 <tjones> #endmeeting