13:00:09 #startmeeting nova api 13:00:10 Meeting started Wed May 3 13:00:09 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alex_xu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:13 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_api' 13:00:18 o/ 13:00:20 who is here today? 13:01:12 o/ 13:02:04 today is quiet, I think we just need quick go through the status 13:02:13 #topic priorities 13:02:25 #link https://review.openstack.org/457715 13:02:46 ^ i guess this is the last patch nova api via wsgi 13:03:18 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/policy-docs 13:03:20 yeah, the nova changes are merged or approved, 13:03:25 the grenade change has a +2, 13:03:33 i can ask dansmith to take a look at the grenade patch when he's around 13:03:42 mriedem: cool 13:03:53 mriedem: do you have the link for grenade change? 13:04:16 alex_xu: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460543/ 13:04:27 mriedem: thanks 13:04:51 ah, I see, the depends-on for that devstack patch 13:05:31 mriedem: should we reach out to the new deployment team about this move? maybe thats been done already? 13:05:53 johnthetubaguy: was just thinking about pinging EmilienM for that 13:06:17 o/ 13:06:35 what is the new deployment team? 13:06:56 EmilienM: wondering about the uwsgi stuff, and if you are are about it 13:06:57 alex_xu: it's a Working Group where Deployment tool projects work together 13:07:08 EmilienM: cool 13:07:12 johnthetubaguy: I learnt about it yesterday 13:07:15 how can TripleO help? 13:07:24 do you want us to test the feature in Nova? 13:07:27 EmilienM: we've said in the past that when we make changes to grenade that we should give the deployment teams a heads up, do you think this change warrants that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460543/ ? 13:07:33 that's needed for using uwsgi for nova in devstack on master https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457715/ 13:08:03 this isn't a required change so i'd think we don't need to email the world about it 13:08:07 mriedem: the grenade change is mostly a pin so we're not changing deployment infrastructure during upgrade 13:08:31 EmilienM: its all part of this, basically: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/pike/deploy-api-in-wsgi.html 13:08:41 mriedem: yes this change is useful for us, I'll take action in TripleO and see what can we do on our side 13:08:43 the assumption is that upgrade happens first, then deployment changes post upgrade 13:08:58 please keep pinging us on this kind of thing 13:09:08 do we need to email the ML about this? 13:09:21 mriedem: about which thing? 13:09:39 mriedem: most probably, with [nova][deployment] tags if you could 13:09:45 EmilienM: ok 13:09:52 so deployment tools can learn about this information 13:10:09 sounds like a good plan 13:10:28 sdague: the note here https://docs.openstack.org/developer/grenade/readme.html#theory-of-upgrade 13:10:48 this isn't an exceptional upgrade change, but the fyi is good too i suppose 13:10:59 mriedem: sure, I'm trying to understand what the issue is 13:11:04 mriedem: I agree, thanks 13:11:22 there are lots of pronouns (this) in the log here, but I lost the subject 13:12:13 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460543/ 13:12:17 this ^ 13:12:36 we've just said in the past (ocata) that when making changes to grenade we'd inform the deployment teams 13:12:52 specifically for exception scripts like when we add something to a from_newton script, 13:12:56 which isn't the case here, 13:12:59 mriedem: ok, the subject is "change needed to grenade to bypass new default in devstack master?" 13:13:03 but a courtesy fyi is ok too here 13:13:20 let's just move on 13:13:38 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/policy-docs 13:13:47 ok, I just want to make sure we don't confuse things more with people assuming they need to do something there 13:14:00 I guess all the patches for policy doc are ready 13:14:02 the actual deployer heads up is attempting to run wsgi by default 13:15:20 yeah, I plan on going through policy docs after the meeting 13:15:28 after we merge those patches, we will know whether we stil left something 13:15:35 s/stil/still/ 13:16:07 thanks to gmann's help 13:16:21 #topic open 13:16:34 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/api-no-more-extensions-pike 13:16:58 a lot of patch for this also, thanks to jichen, gmann and Kevin_Zheng 13:17:31 looks like a lot of test failures right now, any ideas on those? 13:17:39 most of them don't seem to be the live migration failure 13:17:40 probably the cells job 13:18:01 the cells job has been failing with unicodedecodeerror in the journal logger handler since we switched to systemd 13:18:12 http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1580728 13:18:24 yeah, lots of cells failures I think 13:19:01 I have seen a function test failure 13:20:21 I will check whether we have bug for that later 13:21:51 I also should take a look at other API impact BP, avoid all of those cleanup patch hide other stuff 13:22:51 mriedem: oh, that's only on the cells job? 13:24:12 here is the functional test failure http://logs.openstack.org/32/461732/2/check/gate-nova-tox-functional-ubuntu-xenial/83038b5/testr_results.html.gz 13:25:08 seems a related on here I guess: http://logs.openstack.org/09/460509/3/gate/gate-nova-tox-functional-ubuntu-xenial/9ca81aa/console.html 13:25:29 2017-05-03 11:52:15,349 WARNING [nova.scheduler.client.report] Unable to refresh my resource provider record 13:26:08 sdague: it shows up primarily in the cells v1 job, 13:26:13 i have no idea why 13:27:32 johnthetubaguy: here is the bug for functional test https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1674809 13:27:32 Launchpad bug 1674809 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "test_create_server_with_pci_dev_and_numa functional test randomly fails with "OpenStackApiNotFoundException: Item not found"" [Medium,Confirmed] 13:29:27 ok, anything more we want to talk about? 13:29:55 I probably catch a time to take a look at that functional test failure 13:30:48 ok, I guess no... next week probably most of people are in the summit, we probably just cancel the meeting 13:31:27 3... 13:31:32 2.. 13:31:36 1. 13:31:50 thanks all, let us back to nova channel 13:31:55 #endmeeting