21:00:13 <mriedem> #startmeeting nova
21:00:14 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Aug  3 21:00:13 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mriedem. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:15 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:17 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
21:00:26 <melwitt> o/
21:00:34 <efried> \o
21:00:35 <edleafe> \o
21:00:39 <dansmith> o/
21:00:47 <takashin> o/
21:01:03 <mriedem> #link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
21:01:11 <mriedem> ok let's get started
21:01:15 <mriedem> #topic release news
21:01:20 <mriedem> #link Pike release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Pike_Release_Schedule
21:01:25 <mriedem> #info August 10 (1 week) is Pike RC1
21:01:35 <mriedem> #info Blueprints: 53 targeted, 53 approved, 46 completed (+13 from last week)
21:02:01 <mriedem> ^ the number completed is actually more since i haven't closed out the multi-release things, like api-ref in rst, and config option cleanup
21:02:23 <mriedem> but with no more FFEs I don't expect anything besides those to be news
21:02:38 <mriedem> #link Pike RC1 TODO etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-pike-release-candidate-todo
21:02:52 <mriedem> ^ is me trying to focus what's going on for the RC1
21:03:11 <mriedem> any questions about the release?
21:03:21 <mriedem> #topic bugs
21:03:28 <mriedem> there are no critical bugs
21:03:32 <mriedem> #info 0 new untriaged bugs (down 59 from last week - thanks sdague)
21:03:47 <mriedem> #info pike-rc-potential bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=pike-rc-potential
21:04:03 <mriedem> there is only one rc potential bug that hasn't been started yet
21:04:08 <mriedem> and that's handling shared storage in the compute
21:04:14 <mriedem> compute/report client
21:04:24 <mriedem> i'm not sure if jaypipes or dansmith have talked about it
21:04:34 <dansmith> ugh
21:04:46 <dansmith> let's talk about that when we unfsck the current stuff
21:04:51 <mriedem> i suppose the first step is a regression test for creating a server with a shared storage provider between compute nodes and asserting what we expect
21:04:54 <mriedem> yup
21:04:59 <mriedem> i can work the test in parallel
21:05:18 <mriedem> although what we expect isn't entirely clear to me yet, but we'll get there
21:05:30 <mriedem> gate status is pretty good
21:05:32 <mriedem> no news there
21:05:38 <mriedem> same for 3rd party ci
21:05:46 <mriedem> anything for bugs?
21:05:58 <mriedem> #topic reminders
21:06:04 <mriedem> #link Consider signing up for the Queens PTG which is the week of September 11 in Denver, CO, USA: https://www.openstack.org/ptg
21:06:12 <mriedem> #link Pike PTG topics etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-queens
21:06:18 <mriedem> ^ is starting to fill up
21:06:23 <mriedem> it's all very random right now
21:06:32 <mriedem> we'll sort it out after the pike stuff settles down
21:06:50 <mriedem> having 5 days seems like it will be a luxury compared to the forum
21:07:04 <mriedem> #info PTL nominations for Queens are open (July 31 - Aug 9): https://governance.openstack.org/election/
21:07:24 <mriedem> anything for reminders?
21:07:38 <mriedem> #topic stable branch status
21:07:50 <mriedem> we've got a bunch of open ocata and newton changes,
21:08:03 <mriedem> as i said last week, i think we'll do a review push on those after pike rc1 probably
21:08:05 <mriedem> or around that time
21:08:19 <mriedem> so we can do some stable point releases after pike rc
21:08:20 <mriedem> *rc1
21:08:36 <mriedem> #topic subteam highlights
21:08:43 <mriedem> there was no cells v2 meeting this week
21:08:50 <mriedem> but there are some nice new multi-cell docs
21:09:07 <mriedem> #link new multi-cell v2 docs https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/cellsv2_layout.html
21:09:23 <mriedem> dansmith: anything else you want to say about cells v2?
21:09:31 <dansmith> nothing nice, no
21:09:38 <mriedem> alright then
21:09:41 <mriedem> edleafe: around for scheduler?
21:09:44 <edleafe> Most of the meeting was discussing the issues we've been fighting with migration/resizing. So has most of the rest of the week.
21:09:47 <edleafe> I've been going back and forth with the ironic folks regarding the flavor migration code. Seems like there's always one more case that needs to be covered. :)
21:09:50 <edleafe> Note that the amended spec for ironic instance flavor migration has not yet been approved
21:09:53 <edleafe> #link Amend spec for Custom Resource Classes in Flavors https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481748/
21:09:56 <edleafe> EOM
21:10:06 <dansmith> mriedem: landing that is just paperwork right?
21:10:13 <mriedem> the spec amendment?
21:10:14 <mriedem> yeah
21:10:15 <dansmith> yes
21:10:16 <dansmith> okay
21:10:31 <dansmith> mriedem: you haven't +2d just because it's not a priority right?
21:10:36 <dansmith> like, I should +2
21:10:39 <mriedem> i'd also like to see jaypipes' request candidates spec cleaned up and approved at some point for similar reasons - docs more than anything
21:10:45 <mriedem> dansmith: i wrote it
21:10:47 <mriedem> i can't approve it
21:10:49 <dansmith> oh hah
21:10:53 <dansmith> thought it was ed
21:11:17 <mriedem> api - i don't know if there was a meeting this week
21:11:19 <mriedem> sdague: ?
21:11:20 <edleafe> not me
21:11:34 <mriedem> only thing left for api is some docs for the new route map stuff
21:11:37 <mriedem> that gmann is working on
21:11:52 <mriedem> there as no notification meeting this week
21:11:59 <mriedem> there was a short cinder meeting today,
21:12:18 <mriedem> apparently cinder-api with uwsgi broke the version discovery code in cinderclient, similar to what happened with nova-api + uwsgi in novaclient
21:12:26 <mriedem> so they are working a fix and will just have to backport,
21:12:38 <mriedem> since the new cinder api integration didn't land in nova in pike it's not a huge impact to us anyway
21:12:59 <mriedem> ildikov has been working on chasing some issues in the api integration patch which we can hopefully land early in queens, before the ptg
21:13:13 <mriedem> #topic stuck reviews
21:13:23 <mriedem> nothing in the agenda
21:13:29 <mriedem> does anyone need to bring something up here?
21:13:42 <mriedem> #topic open discussion
21:13:46 <mriedem> nothing on the agenda
21:13:51 <mriedem> anyone need to say something?
21:14:00 <dansmith> shortest meeting evar?
21:14:03 <jangutter> I've got a stupid question.
21:14:10 <dansmith> jangutter: damn you!
21:14:12 <jangutter> adding/removing sr-iov ports.
21:14:23 <mriedem> we've had shorter
21:14:25 <jangutter> Anyone looked at it lately?
21:14:29 <mriedem> jangutter: no,
21:14:35 <mriedem> there was/is a spec somewhere
21:14:45 <jangutter> Yep, it's archealogical.
21:14:54 <jangutter> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139910/
21:15:14 <jangutter> So, I guess the correct way to approach it is to propose it for queens?
21:15:16 <mriedem> yup that's the one i was thinking of
21:15:44 <mriedem> yeah
21:15:46 <jangutter> I guess if it was low-hanging fruit, someone would've done it by now :-p
21:16:12 <jangutter> Anyway, thanks, just wanted to know if someone was messing around in that neighborhood.
21:16:28 <mriedem> i don't know if anyone else is working on something like this
21:16:38 <mriedem> but it's nfv so probably
21:17:08 <mriedem> anything else?
21:17:22 <mriedem> alright thanks everyone
21:17:24 <mriedem> #endmeeting