21:01:27 <mriedem> #startmeeting nova
21:01:28 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb  2 21:01:27 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mriedem. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:01:29 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:01:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
21:01:37 * Vek waves
21:01:37 <trevormc> o/
21:01:39 <edleafe> \o
21:01:48 <takashin> o/
21:01:50 * bauzas waves
21:01:55 <markus_z> o/
21:01:59 <macsz> developers developers developers
21:02:01 <macsz> \o
21:02:06 <dtp> \0
21:02:07 <diana_clarke> o/
21:02:13 <cdent> /o\
21:02:31 <raj_singh> o/
21:02:36 <efried> o/
21:02:43 <mriedem> ok let's get started
21:02:45 <tonyb> \o
21:02:46 <mriedem> #link meeting agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
21:03:00 <mriedem> #topic release news
21:03:05 <mriedem> #link Ocata release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Ocata_Release_Schedule
21:03:11 <mriedem> #info Today (Feb 2nd) is the target for Ocata RC1
21:03:17 <mriedem> #link Current RC1 TODOs: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ocata-rc1-todos
21:03:32 <mriedem> as you can see, we have 8 possible rc blocking bugs
21:03:44 <mriedem> all have patches up, some are approved
21:04:17 <mriedem> i've already talked to the release team about rc1 being tight,
21:04:26 <mriedem> and dims_ told me i can take all the time i need :
21:04:27 <mriedem> :)
21:04:34 <Vek> :)
21:04:41 <dims_> within reason :)
21:04:48 <mriedem> not really, but trying to make sure we get the real blocking stuff in
21:04:53 <mriedem> of which we have at least one i know of
21:05:08 <mriedem> questions?
21:05:31 <mriedem> #topic bugs
21:05:42 <mriedem> #link ocata-rc-potential bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=ocata-rc-potential
21:06:10 <mriedem> #link check queue gate status http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html
21:06:32 <mriedem> the last big gate issue bug that i was tracking is merged
21:06:50 <bauzas> can we decouple the branch from the tagging? I thought not
21:06:51 <mriedem> but ES is off the rails so we don't really know from logstash
21:07:16 <mriedem> bauzas: i don't know
21:07:38 <mriedem> we aren't going to branch ocata before rc1 though,
21:07:42 <bauzas> mriedem: I ask for that because of all the implications our stable branch has for requirements or other stuff
21:07:53 <tonyb> bauzas: technically you *can* branch after rc1 (ie rc2) but that could be trick and you'd need dhellmann to agree to it
21:08:12 <tonyb> bauzas: you *cant* branch befoer rc1
21:08:14 <mriedem> i don't plan on not creating stable/ocata from rc1
21:08:17 <bauzas> tonyb: yeah and that would delay other things I guess
21:08:27 <bauzas> okay, we have a plan
21:08:35 <mriedem> third party ci
21:08:42 <mriedem> markus_z: was your thing in here for this week?
21:08:46 <mriedem> (markus_z) IBM zKVM CI asks for permission to post comments to Nova changes
21:08:47 <bauzas> my question was more about the fact rc1 could be tagged quite late
21:08:58 <markus_z> mriedem, yep, it's meant for today
21:09:01 <bauzas> but I'm fine
21:09:02 <tonyb> mriedem: for the record the longer nove delays the ocata branch the longer requirements are frozen ... I don't have a problem with that ... just saying
21:09:11 <mriedem> tonyb: let them eat cake
21:09:19 <mriedem> ok markus_z go
21:09:23 * tonyb doesn't even know that what means
21:09:35 <mriedem> tonyb: google french revolution
21:09:49 <markus_z> not much to tell, we like to post comments on Nova patches from our CI
21:10:17 <markus_z> sandbox communication tests worked so far
21:10:33 <mriedem> markus_z: if it's just commenting and not voting i'm fine
21:10:50 <mriedem> as for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420079/1/nova/cmd/manage.py i assume you've figured that out by now?
21:10:52 <markus_z> mriedem, only commenting first.
21:11:05 <markus_z> mriedem, I haven't, no. Any clues?
21:11:41 <mriedem> markus_z: i can't really get into it here, or probably today
21:11:42 <mriedem> with rc1
21:11:51 <mriedem> so let's talk tomorrow
21:12:23 <markus_z> I'm not in office until Tuesday. If you could ping andreas_s, that would be great. Otherwise Tuesday is fine too.
21:12:32 <mriedem> #info ibm zkvm third party CI will start commenting (not voting) on nova changes
21:12:39 <mriedem> markus_z: tell them to ping me
21:12:40 <markus_z> cool, thanks
21:12:56 <mriedem> #topic reminders
21:13:01 <mriedem> #info Deadline for submitting talks at the Pike summit is February 6th: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/call-for-presentations/
21:13:15 <mriedem> jay is doing something on resource providers, dan is doing something on cells v2
21:13:31 <mriedem> i heard a rumor that PTLs need to do something on releaes highlights per project in general, but no one told me
21:13:41 <mriedem> so i'm going to pretend it didn't happen
21:13:51 <mriedem> #topic Stable branch status: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker
21:13:58 <mriedem> stable/newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/newton,n,z
21:14:03 <mriedem> #help We need reviews on stable/newton after the ocata-rc1 is done.
21:14:18 <mriedem> i'm guilty of not paying much attention to stable/newton,
21:14:19 <bauzas> roger
21:14:26 <mriedem> but hope to get back on that after the ocata release
21:14:28 <mriedem> or things cool down
21:14:43 <mriedem> #topic subteam highlights
21:14:48 <mriedem> there wasn't a cells v2 meeting this week
21:14:56 <mriedem> edleafe: anything to highlight for scheduler
21:14:58 <melwitt> there was technically, it was just me and dansmith
21:15:04 <edleafe> Discussed the issue with the RT patch creating "pure" ironic resource representations that would make them unreturnable to the scheduler, since the flavor extra_spec work to support ironic classes hasn't been done
21:15:08 <edleafe> Agreed to have both the custom ironic resource class as well as the old-style VCPU, etc., resources in placement for Ocata, and drop the old-style once we supported ironic classes in a request.
21:15:12 <edleafe> We lamented that the CORS patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392891) didn't make it into Ocata
21:15:15 <edleafe> that's about it
21:15:33 <mriedem> i hope there was gnashing of teeth
21:15:37 <edleafe> much
21:15:43 <mriedem> excellent
21:15:44 * cdent has not teeth left
21:15:53 <cdent> nor typing skills
21:15:54 <mriedem> tdurakov: live migration subteam highlights
21:15:55 <mriedem> ?
21:15:56 <tdurakov> hi
21:16:02 <tdurakov> 2 things to bring up from live-migration meeting:
21:16:02 <tdurakov> - serial console hook required review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347471/
21:16:02 <tdurakov> - claims for l-m: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244489/ - once updated, requires review as well, all improvements will be done in subsequent patches
21:16:28 <mriedem> those are all pike at this point
21:16:41 <mriedem> tdurakov: not sure if you're aware, but we have an rc potential bug for xen live migration https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424428/
21:16:46 <mriedem> that no one has really reviewed yet
21:16:49 <bauzas> tdurakov: live-mig claims are an old story
21:17:00 <bauzas> tdurakov: mostly because the patch is very hairy
21:17:03 <tdurakov> bauzas: old, true, but need to be finished
21:17:20 <bauzas> tdurakov: could we imagine some better iterative approach ?
21:17:32 <tdurakov> bauzas: we could improve it forewer
21:17:45 <bauzas> let's discuss offline on it
21:17:53 <mriedem> so again,
21:17:56 <mriedem> fellas
21:17:57 <mriedem> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424428/
21:18:07 <mriedem> ^ would be a priority for the live migration subteam for rc1
21:18:20 <mriedem> reviews would be much appreciated,
21:18:21 <tdurakov> mriedem: ok, will take a look
21:18:30 <mriedem> would like john to review that, but he's been helping with other fires
21:18:49 <mriedem> and we don't have multinode xenserver ci to test live migration which kind of sucks
21:19:01 <mriedem> ok moving on
21:19:10 <mriedem> i doubt anyone is around from the api subteam meeting
21:19:19 <cdent> it was cancelled
21:19:23 <mriedem> but i think the main thing this week was getting the server sort/filter whitelist api-ref and release note out
21:19:24 <mriedem> ok
21:19:37 <mriedem> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421760/
21:19:51 <mriedem> which alex_xu split the release note part out into https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428285/
21:20:00 <mriedem> so ^ is the priority for rc1
21:20:03 <mriedem> since we can do the api-ref in pike
21:20:23 <mriedem> the -1s on it are for English nits
21:20:48 <mriedem> i don't see anyone around from the sriov/pci subteam
21:21:03 <mriedem> notifications meeting highlights from gibi:
21:21:04 <mriedem> No critical bugs
21:21:07 <mriedem> Notification related release notes has been merged
21:21:22 <mriedem> #topic ptg planning
21:21:24 <mriedem> #link Pike PTG planning: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-pike
21:21:31 <mriedem> the etherpad she is a fillin up
21:21:44 <mriedem> that will all be shaken out after rc1
21:21:57 <mriedem> anything for ptg?
21:22:12 <mriedem> #topic stuck reviews
21:22:25 <mriedem> nothing in here, and nothing that would probably get in today anyway
21:22:28 <mriedem> #topic open discussion
21:22:33 <mriedem> #link FYI on a proposal to deprecate support for postgresql: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427880/
21:22:43 <mriedem> anything else?
21:23:10 <mriedem> if not i've got parent/teacher conferences for a 5 year old to get to, very important
21:23:18 <mriedem> thanks everyone
21:23:20 <mriedem> #endmeeting