21:00:19 #startmeeting nova 21:00:20 Meeting started Thu Aug 22 21:00:19 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:22 Hello, everyone! 21:00:24 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 21:00:25 Morning 21:00:28 yo 21:00:34 hi 21:00:37 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova 21:00:38 o/ 21:00:47 #topic havana-3 21:00:53 #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/havana-3 21:00:59 we have reached the feature proposal freeze 21:01:07 feature freeze (merge deadline) is in 2 weeks 21:01:12 there is a _lot_ of stuff to review 21:01:23 Have we defined an exception process for the proposal freeze? 21:01:24 so, i'll go ahead and assume that everyone here would really like review attention on something :-) 21:01:26 yes 21:01:39 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureProposalFreeze 21:01:52 if someone requests an exception, they, or someone, will probably have to make sure i see it 21:01:55 given the volume of stuff we have 21:02:08 That's fair 21:02:12 hi 21:02:37 other than "please please review my stuff", does anyone have any questions, or topics around havana-3 that you would like to go over? 21:03:19 is the crazy amount of weird gate failures going to affect any release timeline dates? 21:03:30 my notes on the freeze from this morning: 21:03:32 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/014114.html 21:03:40 mrodden: doubtful 21:03:42 oh, didn't see that 21:04:18 mrodden: the turbulance and risk approaching the freeze is pretty much expected 21:04:33 if something really really bad happens *right* before the freeze, it could get extended a day or something 21:04:39 but i wouldn't expect any extensions 21:04:44 ok 21:04:54 just remember the next release is only 6 months later, not forever :-) 21:05:39 any other havana-3 related questions or concerns? 21:06:16 ok 21:06:18 #topic sub-team reports 21:06:25 any subteams have updates they'd like to provide? 21:06:44 \0 21:06:53 hartsocks: go for it 21:07:05 nothing much from xenapi, smokestack getting closer to being a gate, and progress towards a tempest gate 21:07:21 We've got our 6 *priority* BP we're pushing for reviews amongst ourselves. 21:07:25 johnthetubaguy: thanks! 21:07:39 Then I mail the list when we get things ready for core-review. 21:07:52 We're just getting our CI stuff running but ... 21:08:06 we're not ready to publish results just yet. 21:08:11 Soon. 21:08:17 plan is to eventually make it public though right? 21:08:23 Definitely. 21:08:32 what would be most awesome is acting like smokestack does today 21:08:45 a 3rd party system providing test votes in gerrit 21:08:49 In the interim while the CI team is nailing that down… we may post a −1 and a link to a cut-and-paste log. 21:09:00 sure, that works too 21:09:05 baby steps :) 21:09:07 that's awesaome 21:09:09 Hopefully, we won't do that for long. 21:09:10 er, awesome even 21:09:15 nice 21:09:16 definitely 21:09:22 Yep. 21:09:22 +1 sounds good 21:09:24 test all the things! 21:09:41 That's the big news for us. 21:09:46 great thanks! 21:09:47 any others? 21:10:17 #topic open discussion 21:10:25 figured it might be quick today, busy review rush right now 21:10:31 anything for open discussion? 21:10:56 russellb: Cinder volume encryption is no longer blocked by Cinder change, so can the priority be moved back to high? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/encrypt-cinder-volumes 21:10:56 I typed too slow earlier - just wondering if you consider adding api samples for the v3 api to be a new feature or not? 21:11:31 russellb: regarding the timeline dates, we should have enough time when the patches are reviewed by nova cores, right? 21:11:44 cyeoh: I think missing API samples sounds like a bug... 21:11:52 yeah i think tests are fine ... 21:11:56 bpb: *looking* 21:12:08 mikal, russellb: cool :-) 21:12:09 shanewang1: honestly, not everything is going to make it. it's too much right here at the end. it's not going to be possible. 21:12:12 russellb: Thanks! 21:12:40 bpb: done! 21:12:41 cyeoh: +1, well sounds like docs and that quite good to do post feature freeze, I guess? 21:12:45 bpb: really happy to see this progress 21:12:52 bpb: and your nova patch got reviewed by vish already, that's great 21:12:56 so should make it seems like 21:13:17 russellb: Yes, lots of work and also support from others 21:13:22 bpb: ndipanov would be another good nova-core guy to review this 21:13:33 johnthetubaguy: I hope so, worst case we do something unofficial out of tree first for the v3 api first, but of course I'd prefer it merged asap. 21:13:49 russellb: thanks 21:14:16 bpb: i added ndipanov to the review, i'll see if i can talk to him about reviewing it 21:14:29 russellb: great! 21:14:40 yeah, I am worrying that there is no enough time to revise the patches. Only 2 weeks left. hopefully I am wrong, or the freeze date doesn't work if the patches are under revising:) 21:15:02 shanewang1: ideally it's close to ready and won't need much revising 21:15:14 if so, won't make it 21:15:26 ok 21:15:31 honestly, with or without a freeze, only leaving a couple weeks is a really high risk 21:15:37 i have code at risk too :-) 21:15:59 i'm just trying to set realistic expectations here 21:16:17 because my patch was there and has never been reviewed by cores, hopefully they are not a surprise to everyone:) 21:16:25 I understand. 21:16:39 * russellb nods 21:16:46 which one 21:17:37 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/ubs,n,z 21:18:04 and https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:pci-passthrough-enhancement,n,z, the latter looks better. 21:18:04 ah yes 21:18:10 some cores are interested in them. 21:18:48 any other topics? otherwise we'll get back to hacking/reviewing 21:18:57 jan/feb meetup in minneapolis! 21:19:01 dead of winter! 21:19:04 haha 21:19:07 lol 21:19:07 c'mon 21:19:09 no promises on location 21:19:19 i have a potential offer for hosting 21:19:22 i won't out them yet 21:19:29 but it'll be based on where we can get free space to do it 21:19:36 Hawaii! 21:19:42 +1 21:19:42 Beaches are free 21:19:44 mikal: that would be amazing, i've never been :-) 21:19:47 +1 for Hawaii 21:19:54 I am sure VMWare has an office in Hawaii... 21:19:57 it will be better if Havana release in Hawaii 21:20:12 lol, took the works out of my keyboard 21:20:12 doh, words 21:20:13 if you're wondering what we're talking about 21:20:14 If there's a VMware office in Hawaii it's a secret. 21:20:17 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/013930.html 21:20:25 please indicate your interest in a mid-cycle meetup there ^^^ 21:20:39 i'm trying to get a rough feel if planning for ~100 people or less is sufficient 21:20:46 seems like it so far 21:21:39 how to define ATC? 21:21:45 Active Technical Contributor 21:21:54 for nova it means, have you submitted patches that have been accepted 21:22:09 great, so I am :) 21:22:23 the same rules used to define whether you're able to vote in nova elections 21:22:25 yjiang5: objects contributors will get an extra prize 21:22:32 the nova PTL election, or TC elections 21:22:43 cool 21:22:47 dansmith: lol 21:22:50 dansmith: how about objects bug fixers? :) 21:23:06 we'll all be objects bug fixers soon enough, amiright? 21:23:13 mriedem: sure, but powervm maintainers are penalized by funding the prize pool, so it's a wash for you :( 21:23:18 damn 21:23:21 lol 21:23:45 alright, thanks for coming by everyone 21:23:55 feel free to continue chatting in #openstack-nova, as always 21:23:57 #endmeeting