14:01:49 <carl_baldwin> #startmeeting neutron_routed_networks
14:01:50 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 20 14:01:49 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carl_baldwin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:01:51 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:01:55 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_routed_networks'
14:01:56 <carl_baldwin> #topic Announcements
14:02:13 <carl_baldwin> RC-1 is out and the branch is open for Ocata.
14:02:50 <carl_baldwin> There are still a few bugs remaining for Newton so we shouldn't go nuts on refactoring or anything like that.
14:03:15 <carl_baldwin> We should be able to hit the Newton release within a couple of weeks.
14:03:42 <carl_baldwin> I'll be honest. Since our last routed networks meeting, I've taken two days off and spent the rest working on Newton.
14:04:02 <carl_baldwin> I haven't done a thing to progress routed networks. :'(
14:04:14 <carl_baldwin> But, I'm getting excited to get to it very soon.
14:04:23 <carl_baldwin> #topic patches
14:04:28 <carl_baldwin> #undo
14:04:29 <openstack> Removing item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x7f23bd758e50>
14:04:30 <mlavalle> did you have fun?
14:04:42 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: yes
14:04:50 <carl_baldwin> Any other announcements?
14:04:53 <mlavalle> that's what matters ;-)
14:05:33 <mlavalle> Not from me
14:06:57 <carl_baldwin> #topic patches
14:07:12 <carl_baldwin> #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+(topic:bp/routed-networks+OR+topic:bp/neutron-routed-networks+OR+topic:bp/service-subnets)
14:07:29 * johnthetubaguy is lurking in two meeting at once, badly
14:08:07 <carl_baldwin> We don't have a lot out there. I see tests, docs, and client mostly.
14:08:42 <carl_baldwin> No progress on the docs since last week. But, I'm starting to feel the pressure.
14:08:50 <carl_baldwin> johnthetubaguy: hi
14:09:06 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: How are the tests coming?
14:09:27 <mlavalle> the tests are complete as far as the functionality
14:10:01 <mlavalle> I put a -1 on both of them (scenario and api) because we need to solve the environment issue
14:10:13 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Makes sense.
14:10:18 <mlavalle> I had a conversation with Assaf earlier today
14:10:24 <mlavalle> and it is not clear yet
14:10:55 <mlavalle> I will pursue this with Jakub this week
14:11:32 <mlavalle> that's the status in that front
14:11:51 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Thanks.
14:14:38 <carl_baldwin> #topic Open Agenda
14:14:48 <carl_baldwin> So, I don't have anything new this week.
14:15:12 <mlavalle> Just a quick update on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358658/
14:15:20 <carl_baldwin> Basically, we could copy / paste last week's meeting here and it would still be relevant.
14:15:43 <mlavalle> I have finished testing all the functionality, and it works fine now
14:16:14 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: very, very cool.
14:16:40 <mlavalle> The only missing piece is the association of aggregates to resource pools
14:17:03 <mlavalle> waiting for this patchset to merge on the Nova side:
14:17:10 <mlavalle> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357993/
14:17:27 <mlavalle> johnthetubaguy: do you see this patchset merging soon?^^^^
14:18:02 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Do you think we should do reviews over there?
14:18:34 <johnthetubaguy> honestly, not 100% sure where we are at with that bit of placement
14:18:48 <johnthetubaguy> there was a chase to get release critical stuff in, I know that wasn't one of those bits
14:18:51 <mlavalle> I personally don't feel I have much to add, other than reporting my findings, which I do as soon as I find anything
14:19:00 <johnthetubaguy> I suspect it should get into it in the next month or so
14:19:16 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I bet your feedback has been very valuable.
14:19:24 <johnthetubaguy> yeah, it should be useable in devstack now (we even have some basic functional testing I believe)
14:19:31 <johnthetubaguy> more folks trying this out the better really!
14:19:52 <mlavalle> johnthetubaguy: I am not really in a hurry for that. I've been testing around it. I just wanted to get a feel for pacing my own work
14:20:02 <mlavalle> Thanks!
14:20:25 <johnthetubaguy> ah, understood
14:20:38 <johnthetubaguy> not sure at this point I am afraid
14:20:48 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: one question for you: can a port on a routed network have ipv4 addresses ifrom 2 subnets?
14:21:36 <mlavalle> johnthetubaguy: but as soon as that piece is ready, I want to get it back to it, to test it and provide you guys feedback
14:21:58 <mlavalle> I understand you are pretty much still tryin to get Newton out the door :-)
14:22:32 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: It should be able to but I haven't tested it.
14:22:44 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I'm not sure I see a compelling use case for it. Do you?
14:23:21 <carl_baldwin> Unless you include a floating IP as one of them.
14:23:21 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: no, I just want to know if I have to consider that case when updating the inventory on the Nova side
14:23:39 <carl_baldwin> But, we still need to have the discussion about how such a floating IP will work.
14:24:36 <mlavalle> if we create a port on the Neutron side with an address (or several) I need to update the reserved count on the Nova inventory side
14:25:10 <mlavalle> so here's what I propose: I will assume one ipv4 address per port and I will leave a comment in the code
14:25:23 <mlavalle> indicating that might change. Fair enough?
14:28:17 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I don't think there is anything that actively prevents a port from having more than one.
14:28:23 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: So, I'm a little concerned about that plan.
14:28:37 <mlavalle> in that case, we just change it
14:28:40 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Because if someone is free to do it, someone will eventually do it.
14:29:04 <mlavalle> I'll assume the possibility of multiple ipv4 addresses
14:29:12 <mlavalle> I just wanted guidance
14:29:21 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: sounds good
14:29:33 <mlavalle> That's all I have for today
14:29:40 <carl_baldwin> Does anyone have anything to add?
14:34:29 <carl_baldwin> going once..
14:34:39 <carl_baldwin> going twice...
14:34:41 <carl_baldwin> #endmeeting