14:03:06 <carl_baldwin> #startmeeting neutron_routed_networks
14:03:07 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep  6 14:03:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carl_baldwin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:03:08 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:03:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_routed_networks'
14:03:19 <carl_baldwin> #topic Announcements
14:03:48 <carl_baldwin> I'm sure that N-3 is out by now but I actually haven't looked since I took Friday (and some of Wednesday and Thursday off).
14:04:01 <carl_baldwin> Here's the agenda:
14:04:02 <carl_baldwin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/routed-provider-networks-notes
14:05:04 <carl_baldwin> Any other announcements?
14:06:23 <carl_baldwin> #topic Testing
14:06:30 <mlavalle> Hi
14:06:31 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: How is this area going?
14:06:48 <yb> I think I have finish all the scenario tests mentioned on etherpad
14:06:54 <mlavalle> Last week we had some problem injecting keypairs to instances
14:07:26 <mlavalle> yb: are they running succesfully in your test environment?
14:07:38 <yb> yes, I test it locally, and no problem
14:08:12 <yb> as we use admin tenant to create instances, we should use admin to create port
14:08:26 <yb> thanks Miguel, for help me on keypair injection issue
14:08:46 <mlavalle> ok, so I'll review it today and let carl_baldwin if it is good for his review
14:09:01 <carl_baldwin> You using admin to create instances because you need to specify the host?
14:09:10 <yb> Yes
14:09:37 <carl_baldwin> Is there any way to grant the normal tenant the capability?
14:09:48 <carl_baldwin> Or, is the policy fixed?
14:09:54 <yb> we can change the configuration in nova policy
14:10:01 <yb> that is my findings.
14:10:26 <yb> to enable normal tenant boot instances on a given host
14:10:49 <carl_baldwin> It is a thought.
14:11:27 <yb> it depends on our desision on whether user admin tenant or change the nova policy configuration file
14:11:29 <mlavalle> I have my doubts about doing that.... If we want this to work in Jenkins / gate, we might not get away with changing nova policy
14:12:23 <mlavalle> That is why up to this point I have suggested the admin route
14:12:48 <yb> miguel: I agree. the shortage of using admin tenant is we have to create everthing in admin account including the keypair, the port ,the security rules.
14:14:42 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: You may be correct.
14:15:17 <mlavalle> so let's continue with the admin route, unless we find otherwise
14:15:21 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I wonder if we should ask Nova what they suggest for tests that need to be somewhat host aware.
14:15:36 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: ok, i'll have a conversation with them
14:15:45 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Great, sounds good.
14:16:13 <mlavalle> yb: I'll keep you updated. worst case we talk about this friday morning your time, during our weekly meeting
14:16:34 <yb> mlavalle:Sure.
14:16:53 <mlavalle> we are also making progress with api tests for segments. I reviewed taht patchset Friday and there is still some work to be done
14:16:55 <yb> I will update the code according to your final desicision
14:17:16 <mlavalle> we should be ready with that this week
14:17:24 <mlavalle> janzian is off today
14:17:35 <mlavalle> I think that is all we have today
14:17:42 <mlavalle> yb: you agree?
14:17:54 <carl_baldwin> Sounds good. Thanks for doing this.
14:17:56 <yb> Yes, that is all about my updates
14:19:08 <carl_baldwin> #topic patches
14:19:16 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+(topic:bp/routed-networks+OR+topic:bp/neutron-routed-networks+OR+topic:bp/service-subnets)
14:19:59 <carl_baldwin> We had a couple more merged before N-3.
14:20:13 <mlavalle> ++
14:20:24 <carl_baldwin> We have the ability to create / delete segments (that might have merged a couple of weeks ago)
14:20:35 <carl_baldwin> We also have name and description on segments.
14:20:52 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293305
14:20:55 <mlavalle> The first one is for ML2, right?
14:21:18 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Right. But, even OVN is an ML2 plugin now. :)
14:21:53 <carl_baldwin> The name, description thing ended up being a little more difficult than anyone anticipated but we finally got it.
14:22:41 <carl_baldwin> rtheis: do we have everything in to unblock the client changes?
14:22:57 <rtheis> carl_baldwin: yes
14:23:07 <rtheis> I've pushed the SDK changes
14:23:10 <reedip> carl_baldwin: yeah it was :)
14:23:13 <rtheis> And am working on the OSC changes now
14:23:39 <reedip> carl_baldwin : the neutronclient patch is currently pending, should it be released or abandoned ?
14:24:07 <carl_baldwin> rtheis: any thoughts on this? ^
14:24:24 <mlavalle> It cannot hurt, IMO
14:24:31 <rtheis> reedip: is this for network segment commands in neutronclient?
14:24:58 <rtheis> I think you'll get push back on that since new resource should be OSC only
14:25:01 <carl_baldwin> #link  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290267/
14:25:11 <mlavalle> ahhhh
14:25:30 <reedip> rtheis: Yes, thats why I am a bit apprehensive of the same
14:25:39 <carl_baldwin> rtheis: Should we go ahead and abandon this now?
14:25:53 <carl_baldwin> It sounds to me like it should be abandoned
14:26:06 <rtheis> I think so
14:26:11 <john-davidge> rtheis: on the subject of osc changes, where do we stand with #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342976/ ?
14:26:12 <carl_baldwin> Done
14:26:25 <reedip> carl_baldwin : its already abandoned, just that it shouldnt be resurrected like the Undertaker :P
14:26:47 <rtheis> I need to check with osc team if new function can be merged now
14:27:10 <rtheis> There have been a lot of auth issues to resolve for osc 3.0 release
14:27:34 <john-davidge> rtheis: Ok, thanks. Ping me if there's anything I can do to help with that
14:27:43 <rtheis> will do
14:28:46 <carl_baldwin> Any other patches in flight that we should discuss?
14:29:27 <mlavalle> I just want to share with the team that I've made progress with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358658/
14:30:12 <mlavalle> Here I show a session, where inventories are created in Nova by Neutron when subnets are created: http://paste.openstack.org/show/566927/
14:30:13 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: This is great. It is very good that you are getting a good head start on Ocata.
14:30:46 <carl_baldwin> #topic docs
14:32:17 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356013
14:33:15 <carl_baldwin> Anyone have a chance to leave suggestions on this patch?
14:33:35 <carl_baldwin> Now that Newton-3 is over, this is a priority for me.
14:33:44 <carl_baldwin> I will be working on this this week.
14:34:51 <john-davidge> carl_baldwin: I'll take a look this week
14:35:00 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: me too
14:35:16 <reedip> carl_baldwin : me as well
14:35:23 * mlavalle has to take wife to a doctor appointment
14:35:53 <carl_baldwin> Thanks. I could use the suggestions. I'm sure there are a lot of things I haven't thought about documenting yet.
14:35:59 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: bye
14:36:24 <carl_baldwin> #topic Open discussion
14:36:32 <carl_baldwin> I don't want to drag this meeting out.
14:36:55 <carl_baldwin> I'm not quite ready to discuss Ocata. But, I would like to start discussing it next week.
14:37:06 <john-davidge> noted
14:37:45 <carl_baldwin> I'm now starting an Ocata section on the etherpad. Let's discuss it next week.
14:37:58 <carl_baldwin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/routed-provider-networks-notes
14:38:00 <carl_baldwin> L41
14:38:56 <carl_baldwin> Anything else?
14:40:32 <carl_baldwin> Thanks, all! This has been fun and I'm pretty happy with what we accomplished in Newton.
14:40:35 <carl_baldwin> #endmeeting