15:02:21 <carl_baldwin> #startmeeting neutron_routed_networks
15:02:22 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Aug 30 15:02:21 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carl_baldwin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:02:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:02:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_routed_networks'
15:02:32 <carl_baldwin> This could be short, I think.
15:03:07 <carl_baldwin> #topic Announcements
15:03:25 <carl_baldwin> Newton-3 is imminent.
15:03:50 <carl_baldwin> I have to say that it has been a very good cycle all things considered.
15:04:31 <carl_baldwin> The patch to enable creation and deletion of segments merged!
15:04:33 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317358
15:04:36 <carl_baldwin> Any other announcements?
15:04:52 <mlavalle> We have a routed networks talk confirmed for Barcelona:
15:05:00 <mlavalle> #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/barcelona-2016/summit-schedule/events/15149/scaling-up-openstack-networking-with-routed-networks
15:05:02 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Yes, good thinking.
15:05:31 <carl_baldwin> Wouldn't it be cool if generic resource pool scheduling was available by then?
15:05:47 <john-davidge> mlavalle: carl_baldwin: Excellent! The service subnets talk wasn't approved unfortunately
15:05:48 <mlavalle> yeah, I am doing all on my part to have that ready
15:05:58 <carl_baldwin> I keep meaning to check that thread on the ML about the next steps for it.
15:06:22 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I know you are. Just wondering about the other work in Nova.
15:06:30 <mlavalle> yeap
15:06:36 <mlavalle> that's the challenge
15:06:50 <mlavalle> but they are merging code
15:06:55 <mlavalle> I have to say that
15:07:02 <carl_baldwin> That's good.
15:07:14 <carl_baldwin> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/102477.html
15:07:18 <carl_baldwin> I saw Matt sent this ^
15:07:32 <carl_baldwin> #topic patches
15:07:35 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+(topic:bp/routed-networks+OR+topic:bp/neutron-routed-networks+OR+topic:bp/service-subnets)
15:07:43 <carl_baldwin> Let's have a quick run through on this. ^
15:08:12 <carl_baldwin> Oh, also the service subnets should be operational now.
15:08:17 <carl_baldwin> Thanks john-davidge
15:08:22 <mlavalle> yaay!
15:08:22 <carl_baldwin> ... and haleyb
15:08:40 <john-davidge> \o/
15:08:48 <haleyb> carl_baldwin: yes, just waiting for OSC change still.  And thanks to you too
15:08:48 <carl_baldwin> I did post a refactor that I think improves the code readability but doesn't change the operation really
15:09:03 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/360858
15:09:30 <carl_baldwin> I'll rebase this as soon as possible. I wanted it to implement the unaddressed ports blueprint.
15:09:38 <john-davidge> carl_baldwin: It's a much needed refactor, thanks for going back to that
15:10:32 <john-davidge> I have a WIP patch for the docs https://review.openstack.org/#/c/360526/
15:10:39 <carl_baldwin> john-davidge: I did it with optimizing the error generation path in a future path. I think we can cut down those queries now that it is easier to see what all they're doing.
15:10:54 <john-davidge> haleyb: Included you as a co-author as it's based heavily on the spec
15:10:57 <carl_baldwin> john-davidge: Great! I hadn't seen that yet.
15:11:16 <john-davidge> Not finished yet, but I'll continue working on it this week
15:11:22 <haleyb> john-davidge: thanks, will review
15:11:53 <carl_baldwin> I'll keep an eye on it.
15:12:18 <john-davidge> haleyb: carl_baldwin: thanks
15:12:25 <carl_baldwin> There is one more patch I'd like to get in to Newton.
15:12:34 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293305/
15:12:49 <carl_baldwin> Mostly because if we don't, we'll have to create a new extension for it. :(
15:12:58 <carl_baldwin> It is getting pretty close.
15:13:23 <john-davidge> Ah, this one. I'll take another look
15:13:24 <carl_baldwin> I found a strange issue yesterday that was causing many of the UTs to fail. Now, it just has one failure and I think I can fix it up.
15:13:53 <carl_baldwin> Thanks reedip for getting it in better shape last night.
15:14:16 <rtheis> carl_baldwin: I was hoping to have that patch merge first before removing WIP from OSC network create and delete patch sets since it changes the interface
15:14:38 <carl_baldwin> I think that's the last one we'll have the chance to get in before feature freeze
15:14:43 <carl_baldwin> rtheis: ack, that makes sense.
15:14:50 <carl_baldwin> I hope to get it merged today.
15:14:57 <rtheis> awesome
15:15:58 <carl_baldwin> We might be able to sneak a few more in as bug fixes.
15:16:07 <carl_baldwin> ... and new tests
15:16:14 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: How is the testing effort going?
15:16:41 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: it is going well.... we now have a connectivity test
15:17:16 <mlavalle> Bin is having some trouble with his dev environment. So I will test it today and tomorow in my environment
15:17:46 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Let us know when / if you think they are ready for review.
15:17:54 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: will do
15:18:25 <carl_baldwin> xiaohhui: ping
15:18:32 <mlavalle> in Ocata we are going to add more test cases around the interaction with gneric resource pools
15:18:36 <xiaohhui> ack
15:18:38 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337956/
15:18:51 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: That is a good plan
15:19:25 <carl_baldwin> xiaohhui: This patch has been sitting for a while. Do you think we need it?
15:19:49 <xiaohhui> I might need more work on that patch, but I don't think thing will break without that patch.
15:20:06 <xiaohhui> I can continue working on that patch as bug fix.
15:20:12 <carl_baldwin> xiaohhui: ack
15:20:27 <rtheis> regarding testing... is segment extension enabled by default or will it be?
15:20:46 <xiaohhui> That is what I want to discuss about, too
15:20:51 <xiaohhui> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317358/25/neutron/services/segments/db.py@307
15:21:11 <xiaohhui> kevinbeton brought this out too,
15:21:13 <carl_baldwin> rtheis: xiaohhui: That is a good question. Right now, it is not enabled by default.
15:22:05 <carl_baldwin> Will one of you post a patch to make it on by default? We can discuss on the patch.
15:22:07 <xiaohhui> Should we enable it by default? because ml2 will always use segment, I think it is reasonable to make it as default.
15:22:13 <xiaohhui> I can do that
15:22:31 <carl_baldwin> xiaohhui: Thanks. Let us know when you have it up and I can get some attention on it.
15:22:40 <xiaohhui> sure,
15:23:20 <mlavalle> xiaohhui: are you still planning to unify the 2 paths?
15:23:24 <carl_baldwin> xiaohhui: Maybe a post to the ML with a link to the patch will be good too.
15:24:30 <xiaohhui> I will do that.  unifying the 2 path can eliminate a TODO in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317358
15:25:35 <carl_baldwin> xiaohhui: Thanks.
15:25:55 <carl_baldwin> What else do we have to discuss today?
15:26:53 <mlavalle> Assuming our focus this meeting is N-3, nothing as far as I know
15:27:00 <john-davidge> carl_baldwin: At what point would you like to start discussing plans for Ocata?
15:27:41 <carl_baldwin> john-davidge: We should start doing that pretty soon. But, N-3 is currently taking a lot of cognitive energy for me.
15:28:25 <john-davidge> carl_baldwin: Sure, it's still too early for now. Perhaps 1-2 weeks from now
15:28:42 <carl_baldwin> john-davidge: agree
15:29:58 <carl_baldwin> Sounds like that's about it for today.
15:30:20 <carl_baldwin> Great work, everyone. We got a lot done in Newton and I think the quality is pretty good.
15:30:32 <carl_baldwin> I'll give you 30 minutes back.
15:30:41 <carl_baldwin> #endmeeting