15:01:30 #startmeeting neutron_l3 15:01:31 Meeting started Thu Aug 2 15:01:30 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:36 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:01:42 hi 15:01:43 hello 15:01:51 hey, how are you guys? 15:02:55 good, too busy, you? 15:03:08 about the same ;-) 15:03:30 doing ok 15:03:53 #topic Announcements 15:04:26 We are in the middle of wrapping up our RC-1 15:05:10 I want to thank haleyb, slaweq, manjeets, njohnston for the non stopping reviewing over the past few days 15:05:19 Thanks to you we are in excellent shape 15:05:35 we have merged almost everything we wanted to merge in the neutron repo 15:05:38 :) 15:05:57 The only exception are: 15:06:03 1) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/588079 15:06:30 that can go as well, just a minor update needed ? 15:06:33 This is a release note for port forwardings, that I realized yesterday that we hand't included 15:07:30 I see manjeets comment and I'll address it when we finish the meeting. I have a question. Is there a specific section for 'config' in the reno format? 15:07:44 mlavalle, other: can be used 15:08:12 manjeets: ok, I'll use that 15:08:15 and i didn't see any bugs approved for rc1 either, we should probably look through the list and see if anything is important 15:08:17 mlavalle: there is no such section: https://docs.openstack.org/reno/2.1.2/usage.html#editing-a-release-note 15:09:11 slaweq: thanks. I'll use other as suggested by manjeets 15:09:36 haleyb: let's do that today and tomorrow 15:09:40 good idea 15:10:53 2) The only other part missing are some patches for neutron-fwaas. I asked them today to attend tomorrow the drivers meeting to check at that point how they are doing with those patches 15:12:11 I rebased and +2ed yesterday the 2 patches they needed on the Neutron side and slaweq caught and alnded them overnight 15:12:35 so we have done everything out of their control for them to land the feature in fwaas 15:12:44 now it's up to them 15:13:19 it's lookin tight, though, based on what ws mentioned earlier today in the fwaas weekly meeting 15:14:26 in other news, remember the that the PTG will take place on September 10 - 14 in Denver 15:14:37 I am staying at the Renaissance hotel 15:14:48 arriving on Sunday and staying until Saturday 15:15:02 Looking forward to see you all there 15:15:14 I will start the etherpad today 15:15:17 I have the same plan like You :) 15:15:32 so we can brainstorm ideas to be discussed there 15:15:36 slaweq: Great! 15:15:36 i'm sunday to friday 15:15:51 sunday to friday (Renaissance hotel) 15:16:18 Now a bit of bad news.... 15:16:35 You guys are stuck with me for another cycle as the Neutron PTL 15:16:40 :P 15:16:42 lol 15:16:45 LOL 15:17:09 LOL 15:17:16 Congratz! 15:17:22 Thanks! 15:17:27 I was afraid that You will say that You are stepping down :) 15:17:46 Congratz mlavalle! 15:17:58 I love this team, so it's an honor 15:18:07 as I said in my nomination 15:18:14 MAGA/MANA ? lol mlavalle for 2018 15:18:24 the highest in my careet 15:18:27 career 15:18:39 ok, let's move on.... 15:18:50 #topic Bugs 15:19:39 since we have slaweq's attention, I want to start with https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1766701 15:19:39 Launchpad bug 1766701 in neutron "Trunk Tests are failing often in dvr-multinode scenario job" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel) 15:20:10 I've been using the searches that I posted earlier in the bug for kibana 15:20:20 and I don't get any hist over the past 7 days 15:20:51 slaweq: have you seen cases of those failures lately in you investigations in gerrit? 15:21:29 no 15:21:42 but it's probably like that because those tests are marked as unstable: https://github.com/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/blob/master/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/test_trunk.py#L144 15:21:53 so they will be skipped in case of failure 15:23:03 so I will create a DNM patch removing the the skip on those test and recheck it constantly 15:23:06 makes sense? 15:23:10 yep 15:23:19 ok 15:23:22 thanks 15:23:38 if You will now work on it, we can even merge such patch and remove unstable_tests() in master 15:23:49 will be maybe easier to spot it 15:24:14 and IIRC it was failing in jobs which are non-voting 15:24:21 right 15:24:30 ok, let's do that 15:24:38 I'll propose a patch later today 15:24:45 ok 15:25:05 moving on to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1774459 15:25:05 Launchpad bug 1774459 in neutron "Update permanent ARP entries for allowed_address_pair IPs in DVR Routers" [High,Confirmed] 15:25:22 haleyb: do you think this should be a subject to discuss in the PTG? 15:26:13 mlavalle: yes, based on Swami's last comment it seems it needs some more thought 15:26:32 ok, I will add it to the etherpad later today, when I start it 15:28:02 haleyb: do you have handy the DVR bugs that yamamoto pointed out in his bugs report earlier this week? 15:28:12 * mlavalle looking for the message 15:29:00 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783470 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783654 15:29:00 Launchpad bug 1783470 in neutron "get_subnet_for_dvr returns SNAT mac instead of gateway in subnet_info" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Arjun Baindur (abaindur) 15:29:01 Launchpad bug 1783654 in neutron "DVR process flow not installed on physical bridge for shared tenant network" [Undecided,New] 15:29:03 think they were the new ones 15:29:28 yes they are 15:29:44 thanks yamamoto! 15:29:50 ^^ i'm looking at that now, seems a bug, fix was proposed 15:30:02 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587234 15:30:45 i can see an optimization there as well that i'll do as a follow-on 15:30:49 wow, this is a first time contributor! 15:30:58 time to show how welcoming we are :-) 15:31:20 i think he found a couple of these new bugs 15:31:57 ok, let's take a look at the bug itself and the proposed patch 15:32:13 at first glance, it will probably require some tests 15:32:16 patch looks ok, just needs a test 15:32:22 jynx :) 15:32:26 lol 15:33:01 the other bug is also from him 15:33:23 he hasn't proposed a fix yet 15:33:44 if haleyb doesn't have bandwidth, I can take a look 15:33:56 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783654 15:33:56 Launchpad bug 1783654 in neutron "DVR process flow not installed on physical bridge for shared tenant network" [Undecided,New] 15:34:05 doh, you already pasted that 15:34:28 yeah, I can take a look at it if you don't have bandwidth 15:35:07 mlavalle: if you have bandwidth, else i'll look today/tomorrow 15:35:42 I'll start with it then and yell for help if I get to deep in c... water 15:36:16 haleyb: do you have any other bugs? 15:36:38 i think there's 2 more new one 15:36:51 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783728 15:36:51 Launchpad bug 1783728 in neutron "DVR: router interface creation failure (load testing)" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Oleg Bondarev (obondarev) 15:37:08 from oleg our old friend 15:37:13 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586059/ 15:37:26 wow, nice to see him again ;-) 15:37:39 and i already +2'd that, i forgot to add you 15:37:53 i guess if you're ok we have one for rc1 15:37:53 I just added it to my pile 15:38:19 I'll take a look. at first glance seems ok for rc1 15:38:48 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1784837 was the other 15:38:49 Launchpad bug 1784837 in neutron "Test tempest.scenario.test_security_groups_basic_ops.TestSecurityGroupsBasicOps.test_in_tenant_traffic fails in neutron-tempest-dvr-ha-multinode-full job" [Medium,Confirmed] 15:39:04 created by slaweq yesterday 15:40:06 I think we mentioned in the CI meeting that he was going to look at those failures 15:40:31 I'll try to take a look this week as part of my bugs deputy duties 15:40:52 yep 15:41:07 I found that this test failed few times recently so I reported it 15:41:17 I don't have any other details about it 15:41:58 tahnks for the info slaweq 15:42:53 any other bugs we should discuss today? 15:43:49 ok, let's move on 15:43:57 #topic Openflow DVR 15:44:12 Hey 15:44:27 we failed to merge this in Rocky 15:44:39 let's see if we can move it forward in Stein 15:44:56 kk, We're too late to try for an exception for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528336/ ? 15:45:09 I think we are 15:45:18 kk. 15:45:52 but let's start looking at merging all this as early as possible during Stein 15:46:38 ack, code can't be merged until the week after the PTG correct? 15:46:39 is there any update fon your part davidsha_ ? 15:47:23 I'm continuing to support Xubo on the work, but it's his feature. 15:47:31 ok 15:48:06 Thanks 15:48:35 maybe you have answered this before, but other than configuring the normal parameters for DVR, is there anything else I need to know to deply this feature in a devstack? 15:48:43 davidsha_: ^^^^ 15:49:15 Nope, it's just setting the agent_mode=dvr_bridge 15:49:23 ok, cool 15:49:33 moving on 15:49:39 #topic Open agenda 15:50:17 I will be in China the week of August 13 - 17 15:50:26 so I might not make it to this meeting 15:51:12 anything else? 15:51:32 Nothing from me. 15:51:54 ok guys, thanks for attending 15:51:58 Thanks! 15:52:00 I am visiting Uk for 2 weeks, but i'll try to attend meetings 15:52:09 manjeets: ack 15:52:16 #endmeeting