15:00:14 #startmeeting neutron_l3 15:00:14 Meeting started Thu Aug 3 15:00:14 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:00:22 hi 15:00:27 Hi 15:00:28 #chair haleyb Swami 15:00:28 Current chairs: Swami haleyb mlavalle 15:00:39 hi davidsha 15:00:54 hi 15:01:33 #topic Announcements 15:01:47 So we are past Pike-3 15:02:01 and we are in in the feature freeze period 15:02:51 If you have any exceptions to file, this is the moment 15:04:38 you need to send an email like the following: 15:04:46 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-July/120310.html 15:05:34 mlavalle: thanks for the link 15:05:35 any other announcements from the team? 15:06:19 ok, moving on 15:06:23 #topic Bugs 15:06:37 Swami go ahead, please 15:06:46 mlavalle: sure 15:06:59 There is one new bug that has been filed against DVR. 15:07:10 This was discussed briefly last week by haleyb 15:07:35 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1707003 15:07:35 Launchpad bug 1707003 in neutron "gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-ha-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv job has a very high failure rate" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley) 15:07:42 Multinode job gate failure. 15:08:02 there is a patch up for that, hang on 15:08:09 I have not drilled deep into the issue yet. 15:08:44 haleyb: thanks 15:08:55 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/488381/ 15:09:26 it's not a neutron issue as far as we know, it's that devstack needs to wait for the sub-nodes to "come alive" 15:09:32 yeah 15:09:37 haleyb: good will take a look at it. 15:10:05 Seems the plan is to merge after RC1 15:10:17 haleyb: ok. 15:10:23 if the job still fails then it's our fault :( 15:10:45 well, ultimately we are responsible for that job 15:10:47 haleyb: I did see the multinode job fail in one of RFE patch from yesterday. 15:11:07 the buck stops here 15:11:11 The next in the list is 15:11:15 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1702790 15:11:15 Launchpad bug 1702790 in neutron "DVR Router update task fails when agent restarts" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley) 15:11:28 haleyb: thanks for the update on this patch. 15:11:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481321/ 15:11:53 This patch needs review. 15:12:18 yes, i dumped what ip_lib was generating for ip rules and noticed it found it, but the dict had more info that we were matching 15:12:22 so the match failed 15:12:47 I'll help to move it along today 15:12:55 haleyb: good information. 15:13:07 The next in the list is 15:13:10 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437986/ 15:13:24 The server side patch has merged. This is the client side patch. 15:13:40 Need reviews on this patch to get it merged. This was targeted for Pike. 15:14:04 Swami, haleyb: is this affected by the feature freeze? 15:14:16 mlavalle: Do we need an exception for this patch. Exactly I have the same question. 15:14:33 I would err on the side of caution and send an email 15:14:46 I think we do since I merged something else right after Pike-3 and got a slap on the wrist for it 15:14:51 mlavalle: ok will send an email. 15:15:05 * mlavalle saw the slap, that is why I am asking 15:15:22 I think it's good to go, i had addressed all the nits i found :) 15:15:37 I agree 15:15:47 haleyb: ok will send an official email right now. 15:16:24 The next in the list is 15:16:28 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1667877 15:16:28 Launchpad bug 1667877 in neutron "[RFE] Allow DVR for E/W while leaving N/S centralized" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan) 15:16:33 The patch is up for review. 15:16:54 is the plan here to press to merge in Pike? 15:16:54 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485333/ 15:17:44 mlavalle: I am not sure. The first agent patch would have the higher priority then this one. But since they both address similar problems I would include both. 15:18:10 do you feel ready to request an exception? 15:18:10 Still need reviews on this patch. 15:18:22 haleyb: thanks for your reviews and I have addressed all your review comments. 15:18:46 yeah, we can review regardless, just maybe not merge if you don't request an exception 15:18:50 mlavalle: yes it is ready and good to go. But I will recheck the jenkins failure on the multinode job. 15:18:59 Swami: thanks, i will get around to it again 15:19:05 sounds like a plan 15:19:12 mlavalle: Sure I will go ahead and request an exception. 15:19:34 mlavalle: That's all I had. 15:19:39 mlavalle: back to you. 15:19:48 Thans Swami ! 15:20:13 First one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1683227 15:20:13 Launchpad bug 1683227 in neutron "test_legacy_router test cases sometimes fail with: Cannot find device "qg-*" when moving it into a namespace" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel) 15:20:42 This is the 21st day without any hist in Kibana for this bug 15:21:02 so I am ready to close it, unless there is oposition 15:21:33 something must have changed with the OVS version we are using in CI testing 15:22:47 ok, moving on 15:23:04 I take the silence as a vote of confidence from the team 15:23:15 \o/ 15:23:29 Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1707381 15:23:30 Launchpad bug 1707381 in neutron "Differece behavior about enable subnet service types scenario" [Low,In progress] - Assigned to zhaobo (zhaobo6) 15:23:53 This is a low priority bug that I want to discuss with the team 15:24:14 it seems to me it is not a bug 15:24:43 I agree (now), see my last comment 15:25:13 Yeah, it is the documented behavior here 15:25:26 https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/admin/config-service-subnets.html#operation 15:25:43 any port can allocate an IP from the "none" subnet type 15:26:08 so I plan to add a sentence to the end of the last line in that section to make it even clearer 15:26:16 sounds good 15:26:19 and I alread -2 the patchset 15:26:53 thanks haleyb 15:27:03 I don't have any other bugs for today 15:27:30 any other bugs from the team? 15:28:45 ok, moving on 15:28:54 #topic DNS 15:30:22 I want one last patchset waiting to merge in the dns_domain for ports series: 15:30:37 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468697/ 15:30:52 I request a FFE a couple of days ago for this 15:31:16 yesterday responded to haleyb's comments. Thanks for the review! 15:31:31 and while doing that, amotoki made a few more comments 15:31:38 which I will address in a bit 15:32:15 #topic Routed Networks 15:32:57 I pushed another revision for the floating IPs for routed networks spec 15:33:14 that reflects the conversation we had last Friday 15:33:53 I will complete today and tomorrow the rest of the boilerpalte regarding changes to DB, API, contributors etc 15:34:26 but before removing the WIP and request wider feedback, I would like to see what the team thinks of the latest revision 15:34:47 mlavalle: yes will take a look at it today. 15:35:09 #topic Open Agenda 15:36:26 During annoucements I forgot to point out the Neutron PTG etherpad here: 15:36:44 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-queens-ptg 15:37:01 maybe Swami wants to add his name at the end ;-) 15:37:18 mlavalle: sure, still waiting for confirmation. May be will get some info this week. 15:37:36 any other topics? 15:38:15 mlavalle: nothing else. 15:38:34 mlavalle: haleyb: I have sent the FFE request for the topics that we discussed. 15:38:48 thanks Swami ! 15:38:49 great, thanks 15:39:32 ok team, thanks for attending. Returning a whopping 20 minutes to your agendas 15:39:36 #endmeeting