15:00:17 <mlavalle> #startmeeting neutron_l3
15:00:19 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan 21 15:00:17 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3'
15:00:27 <vikram_> hi
15:00:32 <mlavalle> hi
15:00:35 <tidwellr> hi
15:00:42 <diltram> hi
15:00:46 <haleyb> hi
15:01:07 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements
15:01:47 <mlavalle> Today Carl took the day off
15:02:13 <pavel_bondar> hi
15:02:58 <mlavalle> Agenda is here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-L3-Subteam#Agenda
15:03:30 <mlavalle> This week, Mitaka 2 was cut.... so we are on the final leg of the cycle
15:03:52 <mlavalle> Any other announcements from the team?
15:04:22 <tidwellr> dates for Mitaka-3?
15:04:50 <tidwellr> I see 3-3-16, is that correct?
15:05:23 <mlavalle> tidwellr: yes, that is correct
15:05:28 <haleyb> http://docs.openstack.org/releases/schedules/mitaka.html
15:06:09 <mlavalle> so that is a little more than a month
15:06:22 <mlavalle> any other comments?
15:06:49 <mlavalle> ok, moving on.....
15:06:55 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs
15:07:39 <mlavalle> The good news this week, is we closed one high priority bug. Thanks to obondarev and the reviewers for their hard work
15:08:10 <mlavalle> So for this week, we have 2 high priority bugs
15:08:19 <mlavalle> First up is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1478100
15:08:21 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1478100 in neutron "DHCP agent scheduler can schedule dnsmasq to an agent without reachability to the network its supposed to serve" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Cedric Brandily (cbrandily)
15:09:40 <mlavalle> Cedric pushed PS32 a few days ago. It is ready for reviews
15:09:45 * neiljerram arrives late
15:10:27 <mlavalle> any additional comments?
15:11:03 <mlavalle> Ok, I encourage the team to review it
15:11:25 <mlavalle> Next bug up is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1527089
15:11:27 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1527089 in neutron "[ipam] Port ID is not present in port dict that is passed to AddressRequestFactory" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Pavel Bondar (pasha117)
15:12:16 <pavel_bondar> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259697/
15:12:28 <pavel_bondar> latest PS3 got a lot of +1
15:12:29 <mlavalle> pavel_bondar pushed PS3, which has been already reviewed by several people with +1. I think we now need a +2
15:12:52 <pavel_bondar> mlavalle, agree
15:13:36 <mlavalle> I'll leave a todo for Carl to spend some time with this patchset
15:14:01 <mlavalle> #todo carl_baldwin to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259697/
15:14:25 <mlavalle> any additional comments?
15:14:41 <pavel_bondar> no
15:15:03 <mlavalle> ok, any bugs that the team might want to highlight?
15:15:11 <pavel_bondar> yes, I have one
15:15:26 <pavel_bondar> need some attention for https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1534625
15:15:27 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1534625 in neutron "[Pluggable IPAM] Ipam driver is not called on update subnet if allocation pools are blank" [Undecided,New]
15:15:33 <diltram> I would like to discuss about that HA split brain issue if we have some time
15:15:54 <pavel_bondar> to decide whether it a bug or not
15:17:38 <mlavalle> pavel_bondar: at first glance, your suggested solution looks right to me. I encourgage the team to weigh in
15:18:03 <pavel_bondar> mlavalle, thanks!
15:18:16 <mlavalle> diltram: do you have a bug to show to the team?
15:18:28 <diltram> here is one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1375625
15:18:30 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1375625 in neutron "Problem in l3-agent tenant-network interface would cause split-brain in HA router" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Lubosz Kosnik (diltram)
15:18:54 <diltram> and here is the second one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1365461
15:18:56 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1365461 in neutron "HA router should failover if GW address is not reachable" [Low,In progress] - Assigned to Lubosz Kosnik (diltram)
15:19:05 <diltram> I was writing an email about that today
15:20:12 <diltram> Like you can see Assaf write that probably it's the best possible solution which I proposed
15:20:31 <diltram> and using it I will fix two bugs in one shot
15:21:24 <mlavalle> diltram: so the proposed fix is this, correct? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261942/
15:21:37 <diltram> not exactly
15:22:19 <diltram> It's fixed proposed one year ago by Yonin Shafrir, but it's using only one script which is maintained by operator
15:22:32 <diltram> and not on any neutron repo
15:22:43 <diltram> so i proposed to rewrite that from the scratch
15:23:21 <mlavalle> diltram: that sounds good to me..... please go ahead and do it
15:23:30 <diltram> if I will add to neutron/agent/linux/keepalived.py bash script generator we will have dedicated bash scripts per router
15:23:41 <diltram> ok, thank you
15:24:26 <mlavalle> diltram: I suggest pinging amuller as soon as you have a patchset up for review
15:24:47 <diltram> ok, I will do that
15:24:51 <mlavalle> any other bugs from the team?
15:25:19 <mlavalle> ok, moving on
15:25:49 <mlavalle> we are skiping Router network segments, since Carl is off
15:26:07 <mlavalle> #topic BGP dynamic routing
15:26:22 <tidwellr> hi
15:26:38 <tidwellr> I've been heads-down on this so we have code
15:26:42 <vikram_> hi
15:27:25 <tidwellr> the question where we stick it, I understand armax has suggested we develop in the main repo during Mitaka then spin out during the N cycle
15:27:46 <vikram_> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268726/
15:28:16 <vikram_> tidwellr: FYI https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268726/ is the review link
15:28:22 <tidwellr> we are prioritizing the changes that we absolutely need in the main repo and those are starting to merge
15:29:11 <haleyb> tidwellr: i will +A https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241062/ when the gate clears, it's still pretty ugly
15:29:43 <tidwellr> haleyb: thanks, that's the important one
15:30:23 <mlavalle> tidwellr: are these the only 2 patchsets you need to merge in the main repo?
15:31:05 <tidwellr> mlavalle: there may be 1 more, but yes not much code REQUIRED in the main repo
15:31:34 <mlavalle> any other help you and vikram_ might need?
15:31:41 <vikram_> tidwellr: where the rest of the code will go?
15:31:58 <vikram_> tidwellr: still we don't know, I suppose
15:32:15 <tidwellr> I've been worrying about working code, it's easier if you show up with working code
15:32:24 <tidwellr> but this does need some resolution
15:32:45 <tidwellr> I'll ping the ML today
15:32:55 <vikram_> tidwellr: ok
15:33:24 <tidwellr> that's all I had
15:33:41 <mlavalle> tidwellr, vikram_: thanks for the update
15:34:00 <mlavalle> #topic DNS
15:34:18 <mlavalle> I have addressed all the comments to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212213/
15:34:34 <mlavalle> I tested and pushed for review the latest code
15:35:51 <mlavalle> and I hit a global requirements change. We got a patchset from the bot that updates our requirements that got approved almost 2 days ago. Still waiting for it to merge. It's lost in the gate mess
15:36:23 <mlavalle> yesterday it was 43rd in the line, last time I checked
15:36:49 <mlavalle> if it doesn't make much progress today, I'll just rebase on top of it, so I can get reviews
15:37:27 <mlavalle> after this lates patchset, I don't have any REST calls in any DB transaction, which was the sticking point. So I think it is in the home stretch
15:37:54 <mlavalle> that's all from me this week. Any questions?
15:38:32 <mlavalle> ok, moving on
15:38:43 <mlavalle> #topic Open discussion
15:38:59 <mlavalle> any topics to bring up to the team?
15:40:00 <mlavalle> ok, this is going to be a short one.... Returning 20 minutes to your agendas
15:40:06 <mlavalle> thanks for attending
15:40:23 <mlavalle> #endmeeting