14:59:38 <mlavalle> #startmeeting neutron_l3
14:59:39 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan  7 14:59:38 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:59:39 <haleyb> hi
14:59:40 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:59:42 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3'
14:59:45 * regXboi wonders if we can do semaphore via that mechanism :)
14:59:52 <mlavalle> hi everybody, happy new year
15:00:14 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements
15:00:36 <mlavalle> Mitaka-2 will be on January 16th.
15:00:38 <carl_baldwin> Happy new year!
15:01:03 <carl_baldwin> Yikes, just over a week.
15:01:15 <mlavalle> any other annoucements from the team?
15:01:51 <mlavalle> if not, let's jump in....
15:01:57 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs
15:02:23 <regXboi> you mean other than "#startpanic?" :)
15:02:23 <mlavalle> first up for this week https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1478100
15:02:24 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1478100 in neutron "DHCP agent scheduler can schedule dnsmasq to an agent without reachability to the network its supposed to serve" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Cedric Brandily (cbrandily)
15:03:29 <mlavalle> This one has a fix that is ready for reviews https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205631/
15:04:27 <mlavalle> I encourage the team to go an review it
15:04:36 <carl_baldwin> Looks like there is some discussion to catch up on.
15:04:44 <mlavalle> we've had this one for some weeks now..... any additional comments?
15:05:23 <carl_baldwin> No
15:05:41 <mlavalle> if not, let's move on.....
15:05:41 <carl_baldwin> Just saying there has been discussion on the patch set recently.
15:05:51 <mlavalle> next up is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1516260
15:05:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1516260 in neutron "L3 agent sync_routers timeouts may cause cluster to fall down" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Oleg Bondarev (obondarev)
15:06:49 <mlavalle> For this one we have a proposed fix by obondarev: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234067/
15:07:53 <regXboi> there is an outstanding question on that one from garyk
15:08:06 <mlavalle> Also carl_baldwin suggested in Launchpad that this bug might be addressed down the road by this spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225995
15:08:41 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: did you mean that we might want for that spec?
15:09:38 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I was just pointing out the relationship.  I don't know that we want to hold this up for that.
15:10:18 <mlavalle> regXboi: yes, Oleg requested some clarification....
15:10:40 <regXboi> ah yes, I see that
15:11:45 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: ok, so let's keep tracking that fix by Oleg....
15:11:58 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: agree
15:12:28 <mlavalle> next up is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1527089
15:12:29 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1527089 in neutron "[ipam] Port ID is not present in port dict that is passed to AddressRequestFactory" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Pavel Bondar (pasha117)
15:12:59 <mlavalle> pavel_bondar already proposed a fix here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259697
15:13:22 <carl_baldwin> Looks like  WIP but it is good to know that it is in progress.
15:13:41 <mlavalle> it got a -1 from kevinbenton last night so I think we will have a new PS soon
15:14:01 <mlavalle> any other comments?
15:14:25 <mlavalle> in that case, let's move on....
15:14:47 <mlavalle> #topic Routed network segments
15:15:13 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: the mike is all yours....
15:15:22 <carl_baldwin> Thanks.
15:15:28 <carl_baldwin> I put up another spec.
15:16:14 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225384/
15:16:22 <carl_baldwin> This is yet another shift in direction.
15:16:33 <carl_baldwin> The IpNetwork thing would've been too hard to pull off.
15:16:53 <carl_baldwin> So, this expands on multi-segmented networks to get the job done.
15:17:13 <carl_baldwin> I've also been starting discussions with Nova and filed a backlog spec there.
15:17:28 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263898/
15:18:01 <carl_baldwin> This is just a problem statement for now to let Nova know that this is coming and has implications.
15:19:06 <mlavalle> that is what Rackspace does....
15:19:16 <carl_baldwin> Currently requesting reviews for both.
15:20:27 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I was talking with the one engineer from Rackspace but he has moved on.  I could use another contact ther.
15:20:28 <carl_baldwin> there.
15:22:01 <mlavalle> wise move :-)
15:22:33 <carl_baldwin> Anyway, that's all on routed networks.
15:23:48 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: back to you
15:24:58 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: I would talk to roaet
15:25:06 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Thanks
15:25:10 <mlavalle> I'll ping him later today
15:25:28 <mlavalle> so let's move on.....
15:25:48 <mlavalle> #topic BGP dynamic routing
15:25:54 <tidwellr> hi
15:26:10 * mlavalle was about to ping tidwellr :-)
15:26:44 <tidwellr> I've been playing a little catch-up, took a lot of time off around the holidays
15:26:58 <tidwellr> thanks to vikram for moving things along
15:27:24 <juno_nazhu> tidwellr: welcome back, how is your family?
15:27:31 <mlavalle> that's what Holidays are for :-)
15:27:39 <tidwellr> thank you, everyone is doing great
15:27:42 <mlavalle> especially with a new baby
15:27:57 <tidwellr> we're at the point where we could use some reviews
15:28:08 <juno_nazhu> tidwellr: the release target of bgp dynamic routing is M-2, so far no patch is merged
15:28:16 <mlavalle> tidwellr: do you have the url's handy?
15:28:59 <tidwellr> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/bgp-dynamic-routing
15:29:12 <mlavalle> tidwellr: thanks :-)
15:29:12 <carl_baldwin> I have started to review ...  It will be a priority for me.
15:29:26 <tidwellr> there's some outstanding work related to DVR, but that will come in a follow-on patch
15:29:38 <juno_nazhu> tidwellr: so the release target will not change, right?
15:29:53 <tidwellr> you also might see some new patch sets as I refactor tests
15:30:20 <tidwellr> but we're ready to have some eyes on this code
15:30:57 <tidwellr> juno_nazhu: the holidays wiped me out completely, lost some momentum
15:31:16 <carl_baldwin> tidwellr: I noticed the chain depends on a patch from Kevin.  I'm trying to push that one along first and get it out of the way.
15:31:42 <tidwellr> carl_baldwin: thanks for that
15:32:04 <mlavalle> under the same gerrit topic, I assume?
15:32:46 <regXboi> juno_nazhu: IIRC, armax is the one that set the release targets and they move as things merge or don't - it's more a matter of getting the patch sets reviewed and when they merge, they merge
15:34:11 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I don't think Kevin's was under the same topic but it is a dependency.
15:34:22 <mlavalle> tidwellr: any other comments?
15:34:44 <juno_nazhu> regXboi: ok, but i think bgp dynamic routing need more reviewers
15:34:59 <tidwellr> just a call for some core reviewers, let's drop the bombshells now instead of later :)
15:34:59 <tidwellr> that's it for me
15:35:07 <juno_nazhu> you can see the review comments is few
15:35:27 <carl_baldwin> haleyb: ZZelle: If you have any bandwidth...
15:37:06 * tidwellr passes the mic to mlavalle
15:38:36 <mlavalle> ok, moving on
15:38:46 <mlavalle> #topic DNS
15:39:08 <haleyb> carl_baldwin: tidwellr: will do
15:39:24 <mlavalle> Before the holidays I got a set of reviews for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259697 from armax and carl_baldwin
15:40:13 <mlavalle> the core of the comments was that I was making REST calls to the DNS service inside the core plugin db transactions, so I was asked to move them out
15:40:52 <mlavalle> before leaving for vacation last week, I was I able to re-code it using callback. The coding is finished and this week I have been testing
15:41:18 <mlavalle> the testing is going nicely. I am very close to push the next revision. That will happen today
15:41:42 <mlavalle> all the REST calls to the DNS service are now in the callbacks
15:42:14 <mlavalle> that's my update for this week. Any questions?
15:43:06 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: No, looking forward to the next revision.
15:43:14 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Let us know as soon as it is ready.
15:43:18 <mlavalle> if not, let's move on
15:43:43 <mlavalle> will do :-)
15:43:55 <mlavalle> #topic Address Scopes
15:44:07 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: back to you....
15:44:22 <carl_baldwin> This one has been making some good progress.
15:45:14 <carl_baldwin> I need to figure out why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192032/ has started failing tests.  But, I ask cores (besides haleyb) to look at it.
15:45:35 <carl_baldwin> Once that is in, we just have one main patch to add address scope functionality in the L3 agent.
15:46:03 <carl_baldwin> The final patch is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212669
15:46:30 <carl_baldwin> I've had lots of great help from xiaohhui and colleagues on this patch.  Many thanks.
15:46:42 <carl_baldwin> I think we're close to reconciling it with DVR.
15:46:56 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: That's all I have.
15:47:08 <haleyb> carl_baldwin: it's failing due to a floating IP bug fixed by kevin this morning, i'll recheck it
15:47:19 <tidwellr> carl_baldwin: creating address scopes with the CLI shouldn't work without https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233810/
15:47:19 <carl_baldwin> haleyb: Thanks1
15:47:22 <carl_baldwin> Thanks!
15:48:05 <tidwellr> the server-side code has merged, but the client review is stuck for some reason that I'll follow up on
15:48:23 <mlavalle> ok
15:48:27 <mlavalle> moving on....
15:48:41 <mlavalle> #topic Open discussion
15:49:14 <carl_baldwin> tidwellr: thanks
15:49:34 <mlavalle> I have a little annoucements. My group hired this week a recent college graduate. He has been assigned to me to mentor him
15:49:56 <mlavalle> The plan is to help him become a Neutron developer
15:50:06 <mlavalle> and contribute code to the community
15:50:26 <mlavalle> so he will start joining this meeting next week
15:51:26 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: looking forward to meeting him.
15:51:43 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: I'll introduce him properly next week
15:52:02 <mlavalle> any other topics?
15:52:04 <regXboi> It looks like I'm going to be spending some cycles looking at HA routers under scale
15:52:20 <regXboi> so there may be some defects/patchsets spin out of that for folks to review
15:54:34 <mlavalle> if there are no other topics..... thanks for attending this meeting
15:55:23 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Thanks for chairing!
15:55:31 <mlavalle> #endmeeting