15:01:03 #startmeeting neutron_l3 15:01:03 Meeting started Thu Nov 5 15:01:03 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is carl_baldwin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:07 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:01:48 #chair mlavalle 15:01:48 Current chairs: carl_baldwin mlavalle 15:01:59 #topic Announcements 15:02:20 Mitaka release schedule is up. 15:02:28 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mitaka_Release_Schedule 15:02:35 It’ll be here before you know it. 15:02:44 as always 15:03:19 you know, they should have moved the release up a week 15:04:15 Any other announcements? 15:04:33 Oh, DVR has its own meeting now on Wednesdays at this same time. 15:04:52 carl, you beat me to it :) 15:05:14 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/078059.html 15:06:05 #topic Bugs 15:06:10 hi 15:06:18 mlavalle: how we doing here? 15:06:36 for L3 we have to high importance bugs 15:06:48 first is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1494351 15:06:48 Launchpad bug 1494351 in neutron "Observed StaleDataError in gate-neutron-dsvm-api tests if reference IPAM driver is used" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Pavel Bondar (pasha117) 15:07:03 that pavel_bondar has been working 15:07:18 fix is out for review 15:07:19 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/223123/ 15:07:40 pavel_bondar: I did some review of it yesterday. Need to finish today. 15:07:50 and there was a partial fix merged a few days ago by amuller 15:08:36 any thing else to say, pavel_bondar ? 15:09:05 nothing to add on thiis bug 15:09:22 next one up is also related to IPAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1510653 15:09:22 Launchpad bug 1510653 in neutron "delete_subnet is not called in IPAM driver on subnet deallocation if ML2 plugin is used" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Pavel Bondar (pasha117) 15:09:44 fix is ready to 15:09:54 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239885/ 15:09:55 pavel_bondar has also a proposed fix tps://review.openstack.org/#/c/239885/ 15:10:10 htps://review.openstack.org/#/c/239885/ ^^^^ 15:10:29 almost:) 15:10:40 it look ready for further reviews. It has +1 now 15:10:47 LOL 15:11:10 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239885/ ^^^^ 15:11:25 third time is a charm :) 15:11:32 correct now, thanks :) 15:11:42 * carl_baldwin just added himself to reviewers 15:11:50 any aditional comments pavel_bondar? 15:12:27 fix is pretty trivial, hope that helps to review it 15:13:01 pavel_bondar: thanks for working on this! 15:13:25 mlavalle: no problem:) 15:13:34 the rest of the high importance bugs this week are DVR related. I assume they were discussed yesterday 15:13:52 mlavalle: yes they were discussed yesterday 15:14:04 I kept them in the agenda this week, just in case :-)..... didn't want to loose that information 15:14:05 mlavalle: I'd say let's move them over and leave more time here for L3 issues 15:14:23 perfect, we are done today with bugs 15:14:41 mlavalle: it was quick 15:14:45 Thanks, mlavalle 15:15:17 #topic Routed Network Segments 15:15:40 The discussion on this at the summit was… what’s the word I’m looking for. 15:15:43 ? 15:15:50 interesting! 15:16:05 I heard it described as "entertaining" 15:16:17 that also 15:16:22 It was those things. 15:16:41 yep it went in different directions 15:16:48 "contentious" 15:17:10 maddening? 15:17:59 Well, it was not exactly what I was hoping for. But, I think most people agree that we should do something. 15:18:59 So, I’ve started to add CRUD for an IpNetwork and will have a simple patch up soon. 15:19:51 With that, I’d like to start playing around with creating ports and booting instances. I could use help. 15:20:42 I’m going to communicate more on the ML and via blog about it. Hopefully, we can all come together. 15:20:44 That’s all. 15:21:11 #topic BGP dynamic routing 15:21:52 Hmmm. I don’t see tidwellr. It is early in his TZ. vikram is on vacation. 15:22:26 #topic DNS 15:22:31 hi 15:22:35 mlavalle: You’re up again! 15:22:46 last night I pushed and update to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212213/ 15:23:16 it fixes some failures in functional tests. I thought I had fixed everything, but apparently no I didn't 15:23:32 so I will fix what is left today and it should pass Jenkins tests tonight 15:24:12 after that, floating ip's functionality is complete. johnbelamaric already took a look right before Summit 15:24:32 and I have to add similar functionality for other external ip addresses. 15:24:47 It shouldn't be much, so I think next week will be complete 15:25:06 that's all I have today 15:25:07 mlavalle: great! 15:25:39 I’ll review and encourage others to. 15:26:34 * mlavalle without loosing sight of DNS commitment, wants to pitch in in the routed networks effort 15:27:08 mlavalle: excellent 15:27:16 #topic address scopes 15:27:26 The patches here need reviewer attention. 15:28:09 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:bp/address-scopes,n,z 15:28:23 I guess there is one that I need to give care and feeding to. 15:28:29 salv-orlando: ^ 15:28:41 salv-orlando: You’re the approver. 15:30:05 That’s all 15:30:28 #topic Open Discussion 15:30:59 I'm going to be posting a etherpad on the O(n) stuff by eow - I'm now calling it hyperscale 15:31:20 basically explaining how I do it and showing the latest L3/DVR results 15:31:34 I'm thinking of moving the *how* into a devref as well 15:31:36 regXboi: would be nice to see 15:32:24 regXboi: +1 15:32:38 regXboi: ++ 15:33:10 I'll admit, there is an rfe I'd like to see get into oslo because it will make the how a lot less intrusive 15:34:00 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1512864 link to the rfe 15:34:00 Launchpad bug 1512864 in neutron "Application Metrics for Neutron" [Low,Triaged] - Assigned to Ramu Ramamurthy (ramu-ramamurthy) 15:34:31 so watch the ML and that's all for me 15:35:04 regXboi: Thanks 15:35:37 we won't have mid-cycle meeting. armax sent an email yesterday 15:36:06 mlavalle: I'd put that differently - we're not having the mid-cycle at the previously scheduled time - we might have one later in the cycle 15:36:32 that is a better wording :-) 15:36:57 it would be no more called as mid-cycle can be either at the end or as when needed. 15:37:36 "on a need to have" meeting 15:37:59 mlavalle:+1 15:38:35 maybe-cycle 15:38:51 * carl_baldwin just discovered a problem with ML filter that hid that message from him 15:39:40 * mlavalle will continue disappointed about not having met regXboi in person until further notice about meetings 15:40:31 mlavalle: haven't you heard? I'm still accused of being an AI 15:40:56 regXboi: yeah, but I want to disprove it :-) 15:41:48 as long as you're not Skynet... 15:42:22 nah - carl_baldwin, dougwig, sc68cal and others know better 15:42:22 I guess we can call the meeting. Anything else? 15:43:12 regXboi: If you look completely different the next time I meet you, I might start to wonder again. ;) 15:43:18 hahahahaha 15:43:25 #endmeeting