14:00:19 <sc68cal> #startmeeting neutron_ipv6
14:00:20 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul  1 14:00:19 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6'
14:00:29 <sc68cal> Hello all
14:00:33 <aveiga> hello
14:00:50 <BrianB_> hi
14:01:00 <pcarver> hello
14:01:01 <dane_leblanc> Hello
14:01:31 <HenryG> o/
14:01:44 <xuhanp> hi
14:02:04 <sc68cal> thanks for joining everyone :)
14:02:12 <sc68cal> #topic blueprints
14:02:33 <sc68cal> I think currently our highest priority is the radvd spec
14:03:01 <sc68cal> #link https://review.openstack.org/101306 radvd spec
14:03:35 <HenryG> Time to start nagging cores for +2?
14:04:05 <aveiga> I'd say so, since it's had a few days to languish
14:04:05 <sc68cal> Possibly. I did ask for cores to take a look in yesterday's neutron meeting
14:04:44 <HenryG> markmcclain: ^^ :)
14:05:26 <markmcclain> HenryG: it's in my morning queue
14:05:35 <dane_leblanc> Mark can look at it during his next flight.
14:06:01 <HenryG> markmcclain: cool, thanks!
14:06:04 <sc68cal> :)
14:06:31 <markmcclain> dane_leblanc: haha… I get a whole 6 days free of travel :)
14:06:42 <sc68cal> dane_leblanc: I also brought up your multi prefix bp during the main meeting
14:06:54 <dane_leblanc> sc68cal: Yes, thanks for the mention!
14:08:19 <sc68cal> xuhanp: I know you have some stuff in flight too, I will bring it up at next week's meeting
14:08:30 <xuhanp> sc68cal, thanks!
14:09:06 <sc68cal> Any new BPs that we need to discuss?
14:10:12 <sc68cal> #topic code reviews
14:11:32 <sc68cal> Looks like baoli is not here
14:11:40 <sc68cal> for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102648/
14:11:59 <BrianB_> baoli is on pto
14:12:03 <HenryG> Robert (baoli) is out for a few days
14:12:18 <HenryG> I am working on unit tests for his radvd change
14:12:48 <HenryG> I am also working with him on shuffling the code around a bit (see the review comments)
14:14:01 <sc68cal> Cool. Do you think J-2 is still a realistic timeline? since baoli is now PTO
14:14:27 <HenryG> The code is pretty straightforward and we have not hit any surprises.
14:14:37 <HenryG> What is the J-2 date again?
14:14:51 <BrianB_> yes for J2
14:15:03 <mestery> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule
14:15:10 <mestery> HenryG: July 24
14:15:11 <sc68cal> 27th?
14:15:17 <sc68cal> ah there we go :)
14:15:23 * mestery goes back to lurking.
14:15:36 <HenryG> That should be no problem.
14:16:44 <sc68cal> Cool. Any other code reviews that need to be discussed?
14:17:56 <xuhanp> baoli gave a -1 to one of my reviews which confused me. But I will talk to him when he's back
14:18:36 <sc68cal> xuhanp: link?
14:19:02 <xuhanp> https://review.openstack.org/101433
14:19:02 * markmcclain adds +2 to radvd spec
14:20:21 * HenryG thanks markmcclain
14:20:23 <sc68cal> xuhanp: yeah not sure about his -1. I had a similar concern but checked
14:20:42 <sc68cal> hence my +1
14:21:44 <HenryG> xuhanp: sc68cal: I agree that baoli's comment is not applicable. I'll let him know.
14:21:57 <xuhanp> HenryG, thanks!
14:23:12 <sc68cal> Any other reviews?
14:23:53 <markmcclain> sc68cal, HenryG: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101306/
14:24:10 <HenryG> markmcclain: mestery: Thanks!!
14:24:21 <sc68cal> markmcclain: mestery: awesome
14:24:33 <mestery> HenryG sc68cal: yw :)
14:25:56 <sc68cal> #topic bugs
14:26:06 <sc68cal> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.tag=ipv6 bugs tagged ipv6
14:27:16 <sc68cal> I think the biggest bug we need to tackle is #1233339
14:27:23 <sc68cal> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1233339
14:27:25 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1233339 in neutron "bump dhcp.Dnsmasq.MINIMUM_VERSION" [Medium,Triaged]
14:27:35 <sc68cal> Since that is going to be part of xuhanp's work
14:28:05 <sc68cal> I don't know what we need to do to alert packagers that they need more recent versions of dnsmasq
14:28:22 <xuhanp> sc68cal, yep. We are working on the dnsmasq stateless/stateful code.
14:28:43 <xuhanp> sc68cal, we don't have a requirement on dnsmasq version today in requirement file, right?
14:29:06 <sc68cal> no, since requirements is only for python packages I believe
14:29:12 <sc68cal> *pypi
14:29:35 * sc68cal tries to remember the handle of the gentleman that does debian packaging
14:30:09 <sc68cal> ok well worst case we'll need to fire off something to the openstack-dev list as a heads up
14:30:22 <xuhanp> sc68cal, I guess we will need to be careful with the error from dnsmasq and prompt some clues by error message?
14:30:57 <sc68cal> If I recall, I think it has a pretty detailed error message when the version of dnsmasq is < MIN_VERSION
14:31:48 <xuhanp> sc68cal, ok. we can do some test.
14:32:10 <sc68cal> Yeah, I could just push a patch to bump MIN_VERSION to 2.63 and see what explodes :)
14:32:54 <xuhanp> sc68cal, sounds good
14:33:01 <HenryG> Yup, that is about all neutron can do, plus documentation.
14:33:29 <HenryG> So, put DocImpact in the commit message.
14:33:29 <sc68cal> xuhanp: is 2.63 enough for what you guys are doing or do we want a more recent version
14:33:36 <sc68cal> HenryG: good idea!
14:33:50 <xuhanp> sc68cal, let me confirm that and get back to you.
14:34:01 <xuhanp> I need to check my dev machine
14:34:20 <sc68cal> cool
14:35:05 <sc68cal> Any other bugs to discuss?
14:36:07 <sc68cal> #topic open discussion
14:37:52 <boh_ricky> daniel
14:38:40 <BrianB_> markmcclain: Any update on new API def
14:43:04 <sc68cal> Looks like he's away
14:43:47 <sc68cal> If there is no further items to discuss, I will see everyone next week!
14:44:04 <sc68cal> *there are
14:45:05 <sc68cal> #endmeeting