22:02:56 <kevinbenton> #startmeeting neutron_drivers
22:02:57 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Aug 24 22:02:56 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kevinbenton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
22:02:58 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
22:03:00 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers'
22:03:13 <kevinbenton> #topic announcements
22:03:27 <kevinbenton> RC2 just released today
22:03:51 <kevinbenton> armax: can you give us a snapshot of where we are with releases of everything else?
22:04:10 <armax> kevinbenton: everything else being?
22:04:12 <kevinbenton> is there anything we need to keep an eye on for the subprojects? IIRC we will need an RC3 for the DVR bug
22:04:18 <kevinbenton> in neutron itself
22:04:26 <kevinbenton> armax: everything else = rest of stadium
22:04:29 <mlavalle> I thing we will
22:04:39 <armax> we have another week to cut other RCs if necessary
22:04:41 <mlavalle> think^^^
22:04:59 <armax> kevinbenton: did you keep track of the FFEs you granted?
22:05:43 <armax> technically speaking we probably only have one or two days left knowing the usual state of the gate during crunch time
22:05:53 <armax> the bug itself can always be backported later
22:06:38 <mlavalle> we discussed the DVR bug earlier today during the L3 meeting
22:06:49 <armax> at this point we can only consider RC blocking issues to cut an RC3
22:06:56 <armax> but I can’t see any so far
22:07:33 <armax> ihrachys: welcome!
22:07:34 <mlavalle> so you say better concentrate of back porting later?
22:07:48 <armax> mlavalle: yes
22:08:03 <kevinbenton> the security group logging didn't make the FFE
22:08:03 <mlavalle> cool. I'll communicate that to the team
22:08:07 <armax> only fixes to catastrophic issues would be granted an RC exception by the release team at this point
22:08:26 <kevinbenton> armax: i think the DVR bug is catostrophic
22:08:33 <kevinbenton> doesn't it break all multi-node with HA?
22:08:36 <kevinbenton> mlavalle: ^^
22:08:43 <armax> do we have a fix?
22:08:50 <ihrachys> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497009/
22:08:52 <mlavalle> we have a proposed fix
22:08:56 <armax> kevinbenton: it’s not catastrophic
22:08:59 <armax> it’s bad
22:09:21 <armax> but it’s not such that we release crap
22:09:46 <armax> are we sure that that fix doesn’t create N other bugs?
22:10:07 <kevinbenton> i don't understand, i don't think we can release if HA + DVR is broken
22:10:51 <armax> no point in arguing if the patch is ready to land, we have today and tomorrow to cut an RC3 for neutron
22:10:53 <armax> alone
22:11:00 <armax> but we should hurry
22:11:05 <mlavalle> ok
22:11:20 <kevinbenton> ok
22:11:42 <armax> the last comment from swami doesn’t exude confidence
22:11:43 <armax> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1712412/comments/3
22:11:44 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1712412 in neutron "DVR external port setup fails with KeyError: 'host'" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan)
22:14:01 <armax> did I drop?
22:14:09 <kevinbenton> armax: no
22:14:17 <kevinbenton> armax: i was just looking at the patch and bug
22:14:39 <kevinbenton> i need to get some more details from Swami but this looks okay
22:14:42 <armax> who else besides you can vet this patch? Brian seems out
22:15:16 <kevinbenton> i'll catch brian in the morning
22:15:25 <kevinbenton> ihrachys: he's not on PTO anymore is it?
22:15:28 <armax> what about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1712728?
22:15:29 <kevinbenton> is he*?
22:15:30 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1712728 in neutron "DVR: get_router_cidrs in dvr_edge_router not returning the centralized_floating_ip cidr" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan)
22:15:33 <ihrachys> I think he still is
22:15:36 <ihrachys> sec
22:15:37 <mlavalle> he is
22:15:53 <armax> this is another issue stemming from the same aftermath?
22:15:59 <ihrachys> Monday he is back
22:16:09 <kevinbenton> armax: this is a bug with new functionality
22:16:17 <kevinbenton> armax: so i would be okay with back-porting later
22:16:33 <kevinbenton> centralized floating IPs with DVR is the new feature
22:17:23 <armax> both patches mention centralized floating IPs so it’s not clear
22:17:53 <kevinbenton> armax: the first patch we discussed is for a bug having side effects on old code paths
22:18:01 <armax> kevinbenton: I’d say we have 24 hours from now to put another release patch to release a neutron RC3
22:18:07 <kevinbenton> armax: this other bug appears to just be leaving central floating IPs behind
22:18:14 <armax> after that dims at al are gonna yell at us
22:18:25 <kevinbenton> armax: which is bad, but the only time for central floating IPs is if they are using the new feature
22:19:49 <kevinbenton> mlavalle: would you be comfortable reviewing the fix as well once we get some more details from swami?
22:19:58 <mlavalle> kevinbenton: yes
22:20:21 <kevinbenton> mlavalle: ok, hopefully we can get that today, i see he just uploaded another patch so he might be around
22:21:02 <mlavalle> ok
22:21:14 <armax> kevinbenton: OK, I’ll keep an eye on it, and I’ll file a WIP patch to the releases repo to alert the release team
22:23:24 <kevinbenton> ok, anything else to discuss?
22:23:43 <kevinbenton> i think next week we can resume normal drivers meetings to figure out what Queens is going to look like
22:23:52 <mlavalle> not from me. let's focus on this
22:24:07 <kevinbenton> ok
22:24:26 <kevinbenton> amotoki is away anyway
22:24:30 <kevinbenton> ihrachys: any concerns from you/
22:24:31 <kevinbenton> ?
22:24:33 <ihrachys> no
22:24:47 * dims peeks
22:24:59 <kevinbenton> dims: looks like we will have an RC3 for one bug fix
22:25:10 <dims> y kevinbenton . no worries
22:25:10 <armax> dims: we only summoned you to ask for forgiveness
22:25:16 <kevinbenton> dims: patch is up but we need a little time to review it
22:25:27 <kevinbenton> dims: hopefully in gate tomorrow at latest
22:25:28 <armax> dims: is taht right that tomorrow is the last useful day to get an RC?
22:26:31 <dims> armax : i'd say take your time, but let's checkpoint tomorrow evening
22:26:46 <kevinbenton> dims: ack, thanks
22:26:47 <armax> OK
22:26:48 <mlavalle> dims: that sounds better
22:26:54 <mlavalle> dims: thanks
22:26:56 <armax> thanks
22:27:09 <dims> kevinbenton : will need input from smcginnis and dhellmann too, we can do that tomorrow
22:27:43 <dims> armax : kevinbenton : which review should i watch?
22:27:57 <kevinbenton> dims: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497009/
22:28:21 <dims> thanks kevinbenton
22:29:18 <kevinbenton> ok, thanks everyone
22:29:27 <mlavalle> o/
22:29:28 <armax> short meeting?
22:29:32 <kevinbenton> armax: yep
22:29:38 <armax> OK then
22:29:42 <kevinbenton> armax: unless you want to talk about anything else
22:29:52 <kevinbenton> i just dont' want to review any new feature related things this week
22:29:52 <armax> kevinbenton: you don’t want me to
22:30:04 <kevinbenton> armax: if it's release/pike focused, that's fine
22:30:10 <armax> nope
22:31:41 <kevinbenton> ok
22:31:48 <kevinbenton> #endmeeting