13:01:24 #startmeeting neutron_db 13:01:25 Meeting started Mon Jul 14 13:01:24 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is HenryG. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:01:28 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_db' 13:02:18 I have no specific agenda for today, so we will do status and then open discussion. 13:02:27 #topic Status 13:02:29 hi 13:03:43 At the mid-cycle sprint Mark McClain agreed that the frozen models module was ugly but probably the least complicated 13:03:50 So we are proceeding with that. 13:04:03 jlibosva: a quick update on what is left there? 13:04:35 I'm rebasing right now and addressing comments from 17th and 15th patchset. I'll send new patchset soon 13:04:49 jlibosva: Great, thanks! 13:05:09 Are we confident that it is ready to merge with that patch set? 13:05:46 after testing will last one, I think yes :) 13:06:02 *after testing with last one 13:06:03 yes, I made some changes like removed comments and docstrings per salv-orlando's comments 13:07:00 hi people 13:07:10 Yes, I think so too. Great work! It was very tedious to check it for review, so I can image how boring it must have been to do. 13:07:24 jlibosva: yeah minor stuff. I am doing reviews today. Will soon give another crack at theam. 13:07:41 markmcclain is also helping us with reviews. We should be able to merge soon. 13:07:44 salv-orlando: awesome, thanks. I'll send a new patchset soon 13:08:12 salv-orlando: markmcclain is on a beach somewhere this week. Not sure how much reviewing he will do. 13:09:49 HenryG: I will pick him up for any beach wehre he could possibly be and force him to de reviews astt gun point 13:10:21 Thanks salv-orlando :) 13:10:45 akamyshnikova: the healing migration looks ready (after rebasing on jlibosva's model freeze update), right? 13:12:01 HenryG, yes I think so, I tested it with test from oslo.db and manually with different core and service plugins 13:12:22 I did some tests too and was happy with them as well. 13:13:01 but of course I look forward any comments or suggestions :) 13:13:30 * mestery lurks 13:14:05 Great stuff everyone. I hope we can merge soon. 13:15:09 HenryG, yes I think so :) now everything depends on reviewers :) 13:15:51 We are holding up all reviews that do model updates, so we should give this our priority to get it merged. 13:17:04 Anything else on the status of freezing and healing? 13:18:19 * HenryG notes that Jenkins approved the latest healing migration patch set :) 13:18:33 #topic Open discussion 13:19:24 I have rebased https://review.openstack.org/40296 on the healing and it passes Jenkins too. 13:20:27 Another item to do after healing is move all models to a common directory. 13:21:54 Are we going to remove should_run() from mako file? 13:22:16 and other conditional migrations stuff 13:22:29 I'm concentrating on testing that shows sync models with db content. In fact it is almost done. 13:22:41 HenryG: for that I would just like to hear akamyshnikova where we still have divergence between models and migrations 13:22:51 yeah pretty much what Anna just said 13:23:16 * salv-orlando finds your first name much easier to type than your nick! 13:24:00 * HenryG thinks salv-orlando should get an IRC client that completes nicks with 13:24:34 in fact there is one change on review https://review.openstack.org/104465 but it can be fixed with heal migration 13:25:29 in models everything seems to be fine 13:25:47 akamyshnikova: great 13:26:08 HenryG: writing “Anna” is still faster than doing aka -> tab ;) 13:27:07 :) 13:28:01 salv-orlando: :) 13:28:15 salv-orlando: Any update on https://review.openstack.org/101963 ? 13:28:38 I believe akamyshnikova has volunteered to work on it? 13:29:16 HenryG: yes, I’ve been reviewing mostly other people specs in the past few days. Had little time to look at mines 13:29:44 HenryG, yes 13:30:23 It's just that I see the spec is not approved yet, and it would be good to get into Juno. 13:30:48 Henry 13:31:16 That's me 13:31:20 HenryG: I’m already lobbying wiht other cores to see if there is space for it. It’s going to be tight because there are a lot specs to review 13:31:35 acceptance rate is going to be very low (less than 20% I think) 13:32:52 salv-orlando: Understood. I guess if it misses Juno then people will have to live with 100's of migrations for a while longer. 13:33:38 HenryG: 100s of migrations is something I’m little bothered with. What I want to remove is the logic for making migrations configuration specific. 13:35:35 That is rather important, yes. 13:36:40 Hopefully the additional load of that spec + the coding is low on the cores. 13:39:35 Anything else? 13:40:07 not from me 13:40:15 Thanks everyone! 13:40:23 thanks! bye! 13:40:23 #endmeeting