18:02:20 <SumitNaiksatam> #startmeeting networking_policy
18:02:21 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Dec  3 18:02:20 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:02:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:02:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'
18:02:38 <SumitNaiksatam> #info agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GroupBasedPolicy#Dec_3rd.2C_Nov_19th.2C_12th_2015
18:03:00 <ivar-lazzaro> hi
18:03:07 <songole> Hi
18:03:12 <SumitNaiksatam> i believe folks in the team were working on issues which cropped up during the course of the past two weeks
18:03:18 <SumitNaiksatam> and we were not tracking here
18:04:10 <SumitNaiksatam> hence the agenda is pretty much the same from a couple of weeks back
18:04:16 <SumitNaiksatam> some new bugs have showed up
18:04:20 <SumitNaiksatam> lets start with that
18:04:20 <tbachman> SumitNaiksatam: FYI: rkukura should be joining soon
18:04:43 <SumitNaiksatam> tbachman: thanks, was just about to check :-)
18:04:46 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Bugs
18:05:27 <SumitNaiksatam> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+bug/1521545
18:05:27 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1521545 in Group Based Policy "If service chain delete fails then the PTG can never be cleaned up" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Ivar Lazzaro (mmaleckk)
18:05:45 <SumitNaiksatam> ivar-lazzaro: did you get a chance to triage this?
18:06:09 <rkukura> hi
18:06:12 <SumitNaiksatam> it seems that magesh and vikash were hitting this pretty often
18:06:16 <ivar-lazzaro> SumitNaiksatam: nope
18:06:16 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: songole: hi
18:06:18 <rkukura> had trouble connecting to the channel
18:06:22 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: no
18:06:25 <SumitNaiksatam> *np
18:06:44 <SumitNaiksatam> ivar-lazzaro: i spend a short amount of time investigating it
18:07:24 <SumitNaiksatam> ivar-lazzaro: and it seemed like the order there might be an issue in the order in which we are deleting the proxy group and the proxied group
18:07:34 <SumitNaiksatam> which might be causing it to get into this situation
18:08:01 <ivar-lazzaro> SumitNaiksatam: I see. I thought we were deleting proxy groups before though
18:08:08 <ivar-lazzaro> SumitNaiksatam: could it be a DB caching problem?
18:08:28 <SumitNaiksatam> ivar-lazzaro: oh yeah, could be
18:08:45 <ivar-lazzaro> https://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/blob/master/gbpservice/neutron/services/grouppolicy/plugin.py#L505-L511
18:09:41 <SumitNaiksatam> i am suspecting that this might also be the cause of the deadlock bug which was reported earlier #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+bug/1519700
18:09:41 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1519700 in Group Based Policy "Policy target group deletion failing due to DBDeadlock" [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)
18:12:26 <SumitNaiksatam> other than that this bug was reported: #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+bug/1521854
18:12:26 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1521854 in Group Based Policy "VM going into error state with Virtual Interface creation failed error" [Undecided,New]
18:12:33 <SumitNaiksatam> but i think its more vendor specific
18:12:49 <SumitNaiksatam> also there are a few more which i believe are apic-mapping driver specific
18:13:31 <SumitNaiksatam> any other high priority bugs that anyone else is tracking?
18:14:36 <SumitNaiksatam> ok moving on
18:15:06 <SumitNaiksatam> no new update on my side on the integration/functional tests or the docs
18:15:21 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Packaging update
18:15:26 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: anything to report here?
18:16:02 <rkukura> nothing new - Should I update fedora with the latest packages, or wait a bit?
18:16:25 <SumitNaiksatam> we did release stable/juno and stable/kilo a couple of weeks back, but i suspect that we will release again pretty soon since there were a number of new issues that were identified and fixed
18:16:35 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: was just typing as you were asking that ^^^
18:17:37 <rkukura> so wait a bit?
18:17:43 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: yeah, i think so
18:18:31 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: as long as we have the mechanics of the process in control, i dont see any point in going over it again and again until we have reached a really “stable” point
18:18:52 <SumitNaiksatam> moving on
18:18:59 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: still there?
18:19:00 <rkukura> would also be good to release stable/liberty and get our master compatible with neutruon master
18:19:10 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: you yeah absolutely
18:19:16 <SumitNaiksatam> you -> oh
18:19:34 <igordcard> SumitNaiksatam, yes
18:19:43 <SumitNaiksatam> i was working on it but it has taken a back seat while fixing some other issues
18:20:16 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: i was mainly stuck on failures that i was getting from vendor code while trying to do the liberty sync
18:20:36 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic QoS update
18:20:47 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: any interesting update on this? ;-)
18:21:16 <igordcard> still don't have nothing to show :( have been working on other things
18:21:49 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: sure np, i think we are all waiting in anticipation :-)
18:21:52 <igordcard> it would be best to have support by liberty-gbp right?
18:22:34 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: we will release liberty pretty soon, but i think this feautre can be targeted for mitaka, and as a team we can consider backporting it to liberty if required
18:23:06 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: what do you think?
18:23:24 <rkukura> SumitNaiksatam: makes sense to me
18:23:31 <SumitNaiksatam> ok
18:23:33 <igordcard> SumitNaiksatam, okay
18:23:38 <SumitNaiksatam> igordcard: thanks
18:23:54 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Pending specs
18:24:21 <SumitNaiksatam> “Cluster ID for HA Spec” #link https://review.openstack.org/242781
18:24:29 <SumitNaiksatam> i believe ivar-lazzaro had to step ou
18:24:33 <SumitNaiksatam> *out
18:25:13 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: i believe he answered some of your comments
18:25:23 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: i am not sure it addresses all your concerns
18:25:33 <rkukura> OK, I’ll re-review today.
18:25:43 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: thanks
18:25:58 <SumitNaiksatam> “Network Service Framework for GBP” #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239743/
18:26:02 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: there?
18:26:22 <songole> SumitNaiksatam: yes
18:26:22 <SumitNaiksatam> or hemanth?
18:26:33 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: i believe you are waiting for more discussion to update this spec?
18:26:52 <songole> yes. Hemanth and I discussed internally
18:27:11 <songole> I like to have a f2f discussion and update the spec
18:27:11 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: ok
18:28:08 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: its also fine to update the spec with any updates that you have, you can always mark it WIP, that way the team is up-to-date with the latest thinking (i am just stating the obvious :-) )
18:28:29 <songole> sure SumitNaiksatam
18:28:40 <SumitNaiksatam> songole: thanks
18:28:53 <SumitNaiksatam> #topic Open Discussion
18:29:13 <SumitNaiksatam> anything else anyone want to bring up for today?
18:30:23 <SumitNaiksatam> okay we can wrap up earlier today :-)
18:30:25 <SumitNaiksatam> thanks all!
18:30:32 <SumitNaiksatam> bye until next week!
18:31:04 <rkukura> bye
18:31:10 <SumitNaiksatam> #endmeeting