17:30:38 #startmeeting networking_lib 17:30:39 Meeting started Wed May 11 17:30:38 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dougwig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:30:40 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:30:44 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_lib' 17:30:54 o/ 17:30:57 o/ 17:31:01 o/ 17:31:05 #topic Open discussion 17:31:14 let's touch base on status, since it's been awhile. 17:31:47 My db base stuff needs reworking based on the OVO stuff 17:32:14 Meaning I need to start with a smaller patch that is independent of OVO 17:32:31 my meta model stuff is in it's pre-summit state. i'm still stuck on an internal thing, for at least the rest of this week. 17:32:54 i don't think i have the latest in my WIP, i should update that. 17:33:25 I was out for a week after the summit, so I'm just getting caught up... not that I have any work items or anything yet 17:33:41 this is the first meeting since the summit. 17:33:55 if you want to jump in, we need to tackle the base agent stuff, maybe? 17:34:02 yup, but I haven't been active on review so much recently 17:34:30 dougwig - sure, I have a few other things on my plate as well, but if it's not time sensitive I can drive it 17:34:56 not time sensitive as long as it happens in the next couple months. 17:35:40 dougwig: I can handle that. TBH I'll need to dig deeper into what exactly this work is, as I'm not familiar with it yet 17:35:59 Is there a bug or something? 17:36:31 no. take a look at the lbaas-agent in neutron-lbaas; it's pulling in goo from neutron to make that go. what we move, or if we dup code, is the first question. 17:37:36 I'll start there... Once I get my head around the effort I'll sync back up with you guys to make sure my idea is sane 17:37:53 ok, let's touch base with your initial ideas next week? 17:38:19 Yep, I should have some time to take a look by then 17:39:42 any interest in a mini-sprint dedicated to the lib work, small attendance? or are we happy to work remote until the main midcycle? 17:40:16 We need some meeting/discussion with the OVO folks (Ihar, Rossella, etc) 17:41:20 I am always open to a mini-sprint to get some focused work done 17:42:25 ok, let's invite them to next week's meeting. this slot is in the edge of acceptable for europe 17:42:33 you are referring a face-to-face meet up here or just a sprint cycle planning wise? sorry not up to speed on a "mini-sprint" 17:42:41 face-to-face 17:43:00 HenryG: can you get us a spot in boston? 17:43:47 (or nearby) 17:43:51 That nice MS location in Cambridge has a sign-up form. Also maybe IBM research, but I would have to check. 17:44:06 you have a link? 17:45:02 fyi: travel may not be realistic for me in the next few months, but more than happy to join via webex/phone/etc. 17:46:23 dougwig: http://microsoftnewengland.com/eventmanager/ 17:47:41 HenryG: any dates in june not work for you? 17:48:07 I have nothing until Aug 15 17:49:15 ok, we'll sync up offline. 17:49:21 anything else, or shall we get back to it? 17:49:56 moving the interface drivers over is out of the question right? I saw the patch set 17:50:13 context? link? 17:50:19 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/307381/ 17:51:29 Based on the comments there, I assume its out; I was just confirming we are not going to investigate further 17:51:50 i think many pieces of it can move. might want to start smaller, though. 17:52:07 and consider the namespace. agent.x is likely not the right tree for some of those as standalone modules 17:52:25 Yep, that patch was too ambitious 17:52:34 ok.. maybe I can look at that if I get bored after the base agent stuff if we're still interested 17:52:46 we can re-sync later 17:53:13 I have nothing else 17:53:25 ok, thanks all 17:53:27 #endmeeting