14:00:19 #startmeeting networking 14:00:19 Meeting started Tue Mar 12 14:00:19 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:00:29 Ping list: bcafarel, elvira, frickler, mlavalle, mtomaska, obondarev, slaweq, tobias-urdin, ykarel, lajoskatona, jlibosva, averdagu, amotoki, haleyb, ralonsoh 14:00:30 \o 14:00:35 o/ 14:01:07 glad noone showed up an hour early in the US 14:01:07 o/ 14:01:16 o/ 14:01:17 \o 14:01:21 o/ 14:02:22 #topic announcements 14:02:27 #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html 14:02:39 We are now at RC1 (R - 3) and RC1 has been proposed 14:02:50 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912421 14:03:18 One change did sneak in since that was proposed 14:03:39 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/912475 14:04:00 it did not seem critical, but suppose we could move the hash 14:04:45 more importantly, are there any critical bug fixes we need to merge? i have not seen any 14:05:17 o/ 14:06:53 ok, i will take crickets as nothing to merge, if there is a fire somewhere please let me know as RC1 cutoff is thursday 14:07:59 that's all i had for announcements, has been pretty quiet 14:08:19 #topic bugs 14:08:35 obondarev was the deputy last week 14:08:38 #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/MOTPHAS3EAE3YETTUHGUELTMIFGDSXUL/ 14:08:46 thanks obondarev 14:08:53 late o/ 14:08:54 sure 14:10:04 all bugs are assigned and some are fixed 14:10:40 otherwiseguy: i did have a question about this bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2056366 14:11:07 i see it's only medium, but is that a bigger problem? 14:11:48 or ralonsoh ^^ as i see your comment about oslo.service in the change 14:13:05 alright i guess neither is around, i will try and ping them later to see importance 14:13:26 any other bugs to discuss? 14:14:00 #topic specs 14:14:12 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fneutron-specs+status:open 14:15:25 oh, i see the aa-l3 gateway spec was moved to 2024.1 directory, we should merge that 14:15:36 the other onces can move to 2024.2 14:16:20 +1 14:17:04 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/911399 so if someone else can +2 that 14:17:43 #topic community goals 14:17:47 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/891205 14:18:34 i guess that will have to wait for next cycle, still waiting on sdk dependency 14:19:14 #topic on_demand 14:19:23 i did forget two things about bugs 14:19:58 isabek is bug deputy, but i have not seen him around 14:20:15 should he be removed from rotation and/or is he still working on openstack? 14:21:03 * haleyb taps microphone to wake up the crowd :) 14:21:09 lol 14:21:19 :-) 14:22:17 i can cover for him this week since it is quiet so far, but will remove from rotation 14:22:27 for on-demand a perhaps small thing 14:22:30 lajoskatona will be deputy next week 14:22:46 haleyb: ack, I take a note for myself to be aware 14:22:57 and one last thing about bugs 14:23:01 Current bug count this week: 718, down 22 from last week 14:23:14 i've been closing some old ones 14:23:22 lajoskatona: all yours 14:23:42 +1, I try to allocate some time for that again (perhaps next week if new bug count is low) 14:24:34 so just a thing perhaps for the PTG, in other openstack repos there are already dozens of changes to add type annotation for existing code and now in one of the stadiums a patch appearaed also: 14:24:37 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/911412 14:25:16 I would keep the code consistent at least for networking projects to make maintenance simpler 14:25:26 (simple?) 14:25:34 is there a general openstack community guidance/directiva in regards to type annotation? 14:25:35 (more simple?) 14:25:59 mlavalle: I don't think so, but perhaps hidden somewhere 14:26:15 so it's really up to us 14:27:38 yes, so I can imagine that with annotations we can make the code more robust for some kind of bugs, or mistakes, that can be considered 14:27:38 right. that seems like a big change, but it is something we can talk about at the PTG 14:27:52 haleyb: +1 14:27:57 cool 14:28:16 i know there are things like pyupgrade too, which can fix all the super() calls and some class declarations 14:28:21 that's it from me 14:28:32 i see it being used in octavia at least 14:29:02 thinking of PTG i will need to pick days/times for meetings and book them, will get to that this week 14:29:19 thanks haleyb 14:29:24 and i guess create an etherpad if there's not one already 14:30:36 lajoskatona: thanks for bringing it up 14:30:43 anything else to discuss? 14:30:48 not from me 14:30:57 there is the neutron CI meeting in :30 14:31:13 video or irc? 14:31:25 last week was video, so should be irc 14:31:32 all right 14:31:59 ok, have a good week everyone! 14:32:04 #endmeeting