14:00:27 #startmeeting networking 14:00:27 Meeting started Tue Oct 13 14:00:27 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:30 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 14:00:38 o/ 14:00:41 Hi 14:00:53 o/ 14:01:30 hi 14:01:32 #topic Announcements 14:01:34 o/ 14:02:05 first, the most important one 14:02:16 this week is Victoria release week \o/ 14:02:36 thank You everyone who was involved in that release in Neutron or neutron stadium 14:02:41 great job :) 14:03:11 o/ 14:03:30 TC elections ends today: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-October/017924.html - please vote if You didn't yet 14:03:48 next one 14:03:51 OpenInfra summit is next week: https://www.openstack.org/summit/2020/ 14:04:04 if You want to attend, please register, it's free 14:04:29 next one 14:04:32 Virtual PTG in October (26-30) 14:04:49 if You didn't register yet, please do so at https://october2020ptg.eventbrite.com 14:04:58 etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-wallaby-ptg - please add ideas of the topics there 14:05:09 I will start planning agenda around Thursday 22nd of October 14:05:44 hi (sorry) 14:06:05 and that are basically all announcements from me for today 14:06:13 do You have anything else to add here? 14:08:01 last week it was obondarev's birthday 14:08:09 :D 14:08:19 happy birtday obondarev :) 14:08:25 happy bday! 14:08:26 Thanks! :) 14:08:37 yeah, happy birthday :-) 14:08:53 most important announcement for last :) happy bday! 14:09:02 thanks folks! 14:09:13 ok, lets move on 14:09:18 #topic Blueprints 14:09:38 we finished BPs which were scheduled for Victoria 14:10:12 today I marked as implemented https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/local-ip-prefix-in-metering-rules 14:10:35 BPs which are moved to the next release we will need to plan in next weeks 14:10:49 now I don't have anything else to discuss here 14:11:01 but maybe You want to talk about any of BPs? 14:12:12 well, if I can have some of you gents nudge this over the edege: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756927/ 14:12:21 it's for the address groups BP 14:13:25 mlavalle: +W'ed 14:13:32 ah ralonsoh was faster :) 14:13:44 Thanks! 14:15:55 ok, so lets move on 14:16:02 #topic Community Goals 14:16:17 I have only update about migration to zuul v3 14:16:31 last week we finally merged last missing patch with neutron-ovn-grenade job 14:16:43 so I think we can say that we accomplished that goal :) 14:17:13 congrats 14:17:46 and it's victoria backport yesterday 14:17:59 tosky: yes, I saw :) 14:18:00 backported and merged indeed! 14:18:19 the backport didn't require the 12 rechecks of the original commit 14:19:28 tosky: fortunatelly 14:20:39 ok, I think we can move on now 14:20:45 #topic Bugs 14:20:55 our bug deputy was njohnston last week 14:21:18 and his report is at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-October/017919.html 14:21:34 it seems that it was pretty busy week 14:22:08 there is 4 unassigned bugs there 14:22:11 2 related to ovn: 14:22:23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1898862 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1899207 14:22:25 Launchpad bug 1898862 in neutron "Job neutron-ovn-tempest-ovs-release-ipv6-only is failing 100% of times" [High,Confirmed] 14:22:26 Launchpad bug 1899207 in neutron "[OVN][Docs] admin/config-dns-res.html should be updated for OVN" [Medium,Triaged] 14:22:51 one for stable release and seems like more related to infra: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898748 14:22:53 Launchpad bug 1898748 in neutron "[stable/train] Creation of the QoS policy takes ages" [Critical,Confirmed] 14:23:06 I'll check the first one (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1898862) 14:23:13 thx ralonsoh 14:23:22 and there is also one related to dvr: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1899006 14:23:24 Launchpad bug 1899006 in neutron "Wrong mac address of ARP entry setting for allowed_address_pairs in DVR router" [High,Triaged] 14:23:50 which I may try to check if there will be no other volunteers for that 14:24:43 and there is also one more bug, reported by amorin https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1899502 14:24:44 Launchpad bug 1899502 in neutron "router_centralized_snat ports do not have project_id" [Low,New] - Assigned to Arnaud Morin (arnaud-morin) 14:24:48 which I wanted to ask You about 14:25:07 mostly to the people who remembers "old, quantum days" :) 14:25:08 hello 14:25:18 hi amorin 14:25:39 do You know any reason why router_centralized_snat don't have tenant_id? 14:26:45 slaweq: i think it's because that port is an implementation detail 14:26:50 I remember only one that haleyb mentioned in his comment 14:28:12 these ports are supposed to be non-visible in port-list for regular users 14:28:23 but for some reason they are 14:28:50 if you dont mind, I'd like to catch your attention on the fact that if they are not visible, the client will not know that one IP is taken in the pool 14:29:06 so, IMHO, we should keep it visible like it is 14:29:46 in my company (OVH), for implementation details, we need a project_id on this port 14:29:56 that's why I proposed this patch 14:30:46 personally I'm ok with adding project_id to that port but I just wanted to ask more experienced people if we will not gonna break anything with that change 14:31:03 sure 14:31:24 also, it's user visible change - should we add api extension for that? (I know You already hate me for such questions but I have to :)) 14:31:28 it might be fine, even i don't remember the specific details, just didn't want to break something else since it seemed intentional 14:32:07 I'd agree with amorin: since such ports are visible already adding project_id should not hurt. 14:32:32 Just need to verify that it's indeed regular user with no admin rights 14:36:10 yeah, I agree 14:36:23 ok, I don't see any strong opinions about why we shouldn't do that, so lets move on with review of the amorin's patch now 14:36:35 thanks 14:36:55 and that's all bugs which I had for You today 14:37:08 any other bugs You want to discuss? 14:39:36 ok, I guess that this silence means "no" and we can move on :) 14:39:39 :) 14:39:56 this week our bug deputy is amotoki and he knows about it already 14:40:02 and next week is mlavalle's turn 14:40:07 mlavalle: are You ok with that? 14:41:15 yes 14:41:23 thx mlavalle 14:41:33 so, one last topic for today 14:41:37 #topic On Demand Agenda 14:41:54 I wanted to ask You about team meetings in next weeks 14:42:23 as next week is openinfra summit and later is ptg, would it be ok for You if we will cancel our meeting in those 2 weeks? 14:42:36 or do You think we should do it still on irc? 14:42:46 ok for me 14:42:53 I think it is ok to cancel 14:42:55 (to cancel) 14:43:02 sounds OK, PTG week will be a long meeting anyway by itself 14:43:10 and next week should be quiet with victoria release 14:43:21 +1 cancelling 14:45:03 ok, so I think it's enough votes for cancel meeting next 2 weeks 14:45:17 I will send an email about that later this week 14:45:19 +1 for cancelling 14:45:28 and that's all from my side for today 14:45:50 so unless You have anything else You want to discuss, we can finish earlier today 14:45:57 +1 14:46:55 let's keep topics for ptg and finish earlier :) 14:47:16 so, thx for attending and see You around online (and next week on virtual summit) 14:47:22 o/ 14:47:23 o/ 14:47:25 #endmeeting