21:00:07 #startmeeting networking 21:00:08 Meeting started Mon Jan 7 21:00:07 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 21:01:11 Hi there! 21:01:30 o/ 21:01:35 howdy 21:02:01 o/ 21:02:09 I hope everybody had a great Holiday season 21:02:18 welcome to 2019 with Neutron 21:03:32 As usual, we will follow our wiki page as the meeting's agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings 21:03:44 #topic Announcements 21:04:11 This week, we have reached the Stein-2 milestone 21:04:41 Please remember that we don't release code automatically anymore with each milestone 21:04:55 hi 21:05:06 in fact we relased a Neutron Stein beta recently 21:05:38 any other announcements for today? 21:06:20 ok, let's move on 21:06:26 #topic Blueprints 21:07:00 This is the list of blueprints we are tracking for Stein-2 21:07:19 #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/stein-2 21:08:10 Please note that right before the holidays, around the 21st, we merged this spec: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/stein/port-mirroring-sriov-vfs.html 21:08:11 hi 21:08:52 and manjeets, munimeha1 and other have been making great progress with the implementation: 21:09:00 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603501 21:09:38 I know yamamoto and others have +2 powers in the TaaS receipe, so I request that they take a look at the code 21:09:58 I'll probably ping them tonight to make sure they are aware 21:10:11 munimeha1, manjeets: do you want to add something? 21:10:41 mlavalle, I think you've covered it all thanks ! 21:10:51 nothing fromme 21:12:47 I don't see rubasov around, but I can report that he and lajoskatona have been making great progress with https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/strict-minimum-bandwidth-support 21:13:14 These are the patches in the series: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:minimum-bandwidth-allocation-placement-api 21:13:40 although we missed the staein-2 milestone, I think we are in good position to conclude it in this cycle 21:13:52 slaweq: any comments on this blueprints? 21:14:11 no, TBH I didn't review those patches in last few days 21:14:18 but I will get back to it :) 21:14:23 thanks! 21:14:38 but basically most of the work is done IIRC 21:14:45 yeap 21:15:00 there are some patches with tests and some small "nits" to finish 21:15:02 thanks mlavalle 21:16:23 I don't see tidwellr today around, but in regards to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/subnet-onboard 21:16:51 I think we removed some misunderstandings in regards to the API right before the break 21:17:04 so that implementation should move smoothly now 21:17:54 njohnston has been making good progress with https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/speed-up-neutron-bulk-creation 21:18:34 he found some issues with port binding in this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624815/ 21:18:57 I offered to help find the issue but I encourage others to pitch in if you have bandwidth 21:19:35 anything else that should be commented on blueprints today? 21:20:45 #topic Community Goals 21:21:16 Before leaving for the break, we were making good, steady progress with our community goals 21:21:45 amotoki: you around today to talk about policy in code? 21:22:41 ok 21:23:00 njohnston doesn't seem to be around to tlak about Python 3 21:23:07 so let's move on 21:23:12 about python 3 21:23:20 go ahead slaweq 21:23:21 I can give quick update 21:23:41 we are now moving some tempest jobs to be running on python3 21:23:52 neutron-tempest-iptables_hybrid is already done 21:24:01 and it looks fine in general 21:24:23 there is also patch to switch neutron-tempest-linuxbridge and neutron-tempest-dvr job to py3 21:24:44 are they good to go in your opinion? 21:24:46 with those patches I think that most of our jobs will be running on py3 21:24:56 mlavalle: yes, they should be 21:25:12 ok, will look for them later 21:25:19 only problem which we still have is with functional job and this subunit parser issue 21:25:31 but I'm doing some slow progress on it 21:25:51 that is a good segway to the bugs section 21:25:55 #topic Bugs 21:26:06 Our bugs deputy last week was slaweq 21:26:15 my report is in http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-January/001453.html 21:26:28 you beat me to it :-) 21:26:33 I want to raise here one issue 21:26:59 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1810518 - it's problem with new oslo.privsep and our functional tests 21:26:59 Launchpad bug 1810518 in oslo.privsep "neutron-functional tests failing with oslo.privsep 1.31" [Critical,Confirmed] - Assigned to Ben Nemec (bnemec) 21:27:38 if someone have experience with using C callbacks in python, please take a look at it maybe :) 21:28:06 have you asked rubasov? 21:28:15 no, I didn't 21:28:25 I know that bnemec is looking at it from oslo.privsep side 21:28:34 and that haleyb took a look today also 21:28:42 but I'm not sure if they found anything 21:29:08 We found the same thing, but it didn't fix it for either of us. :-/ 21:29:08 a few months ago we added some code (I think is was haleyb) with calls to C and rubasov made comments in that patch that led me to believe he has some experience 21:29:27 I proposed patch to requirements https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628916/ to not use this version of privsep for now, but we need proper fix for it asap 21:29:47 mlavalle: thx, I will ask him tomorrow morning then 21:29:52 i did not find a fix, just went in circles 21:30:00 so I would ping him tomorrow. he is just around the coner for you, in Budapest ;-) 21:30:24 mlavalle: yes, I know, thx :) 21:31:33 other things you want to highlight slaweq? 21:31:50 no, for other bugs I think it is quite fine 21:32:06 there are patches in progress for most of them already 21:32:19 cool 21:32:23 good job 21:32:31 thx :) 21:33:04 I also went over the reports from hongbin and pawel. hongbin has a really quite week, with mostly rfe's some of which I have already added comments to 21:33:29 pawel reported this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1809447 21:33:29 Launchpad bug 1809447 in neutron "performance regression from mitaka to ocata" [Undecided,New] 21:33:52 this is worth keeping an eye on from the perspective of the neutron performance team 21:34:15 I am thinking of adding a performance tag, so we can keep this stuff together 21:34:33 oh, this week there was similar bug related to security groups: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1810563 21:34:33 Launchpad bug 1810563 in neutron "adding rules to security groups is slow" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Doug Wiegley (dougwig) 21:35:10 ahh, good to see dougwig around 21:35:26 ok, I'll work on that tag 21:36:12 This week our deputy is boden 21:36:59 and next week is njohnston 21:37:16 anything else on bugs? 21:37:46 ok, moving on 21:37:52 #topic neutron-lib 21:37:57 boden: you are up 21:38:21 hi 21:38:39 I was thinking we could try to do another lib release in the next week or 2 21:38:50 I have 2 patches I was waiting for in particular 21:38:56 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628004/ 21:39:02 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/625332/ 21:39:30 we can checkpoint next week and see if we are ready for a release, and in meantime if folks get time ^^ 21:39:52 so, to be clear, you want those two patches in before the release, right? 21:40:19 mlavalle yeah I was hoping 21:40:29 ok, I'll take a look at them 21:40:47 they are in my pile now 21:41:28 there are a number of neutron patches out there for review too... they can be found on the queries in the neutron-lib section of the meeting wiki 21:41:43 ok 21:42:07 I would like to ask for some eyes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628033/ as it touches a lot of files and may become difficult to maintain if in the review queue too long 21:42:16 boden: ok, I will check them this week 21:42:32 mlavalle slaweq thank you 21:42:45 added this last one to my pile as well 21:42:52 that's really all I have unless there are questions/comments 21:43:33 ok, let's move on 21:43:50 #topic os-ken 21:44:11 mhhh, hongbin doesn't seem to be around 21:44:23 let me check my email to see if he sent and update 21:45:10 nope, no update from hongbin this week 21:45:23 so let's move on 21:45:30 #topic On demand agenda 21:45:37 IIRC switch to os-ken was done already for neutron and dynamic-routing repos at least 21:45:44 and it works fine as for now 21:45:49 yeap 21:46:11 any other topics to discuss today? 21:46:52 ok, thanks for attending the meeting 21:47:08 I wish everybody a very happy and succesful 2019! 21:47:11 #endmeeting