14:00:19 <mlavalle> #startmeeting networking
14:00:20 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 17 14:00:19 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
14:00:41 <manjeets_> Hello !
14:00:42 <njohnston> o/
14:00:46 <bcafarel> o/
14:00:48 <slaweq> hi
14:01:06 <rubasov> o/
14:01:17 <amotoki> o/
14:01:20 <haleyb> hi
14:01:30 <mlavalle> Agenda's wiki is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings
14:01:33 <annp_> hi
14:01:36 <pjrusak_> hi
14:01:38 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements
14:01:43 <hongbin> o/
14:02:17 <mlavalle> Next week is the Rocky-3 milestone and we will be releasing Neutron and the associated Stadium projects
14:03:10 <mlavalle> This week we are releasing neutron-lib 1.18.0: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583012/
14:03:33 <mlavalle> We merged all the patches that were marked for this neutron-lib release
14:04:42 <mlavalle> Today is the last day to propose presentations for the Berlin Summit:
14:04:49 <mlavalle> #link https://www.openstack.org/summit-login/login?BackURL=%2Fsummit%2Fberlin-2018%2Fcall-for-presentations%2F
14:05:44 <mlavalle> And finally the PTG in Denver will take place in September 10 - 14:
14:05:54 <mlavalle> #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/
14:06:05 <mlavalle> I look forward to seeing many of you there
14:06:45 <mlavalle> Please note that the ticket price is $399 and it will increase to $599 on August 23rd
14:06:57 <mlavalle> Any other announcements?
14:07:59 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on
14:08:07 <mlavalle> #topic Blueprints
14:08:50 <mlavalle> Since we are approaching the release milestone, I will be working with those of you who are leading blueprints to assess the progress in those blueprints
14:09:11 <mlavalle> Does anyone have an update on a blueprint to be discussed during today's meeting?
14:09:26 <annp_> hi
14:09:36 <mlavalle> hi annp_
14:09:53 <annp_> regards to logging for firewall
14:10:22 <annp_> Here is list of patches https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1720727+(status:open+OR+status:merged) need your eyes.
14:11:22 <annp_> and here is our plan for review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Logging_service_for_FWaaS_review_plan
14:11:40 <mlavalle> annp_: I added it to my pile. I will also bring it up during the FWaaS meeting this coming Thursday at 1400UTC
14:12:13 <annp_> and we also created a doc guide for how to setup environment with logging ttps://github.com/longkb/logging/blob/master/Ingration guideline for logging service in FWaaS.rst
14:12:27 <annp_> mlavalle, thanks a ton.
14:12:58 <annp_> mlavalle, Do you know when FFE is open?
14:13:20 <mlavalle> annp_: that will be next week
14:13:34 <annp_> mlavalle, I'd like to register a FFE for firewall logging.
14:13:45 <annp_> mlavalle, I got it. Thanks.
14:13:50 <mlavalle> ok, let's wok on it this week
14:14:19 <annp_> mlavalle, that's all for logging. Please go ahead.
14:14:42 <mlavalle> annp_: that last github url seems to be wrong. I tried it
14:14:56 <hoangcx_> correct link for guideline should be: https://github.com/longkb/logging/blob/master/Ingration%20guideline%20for%20logging%20service%20in%20FWaaS.rst
14:15:23 <annp_> hoangcx, thanks.
14:15:27 <mlavalle> hoangcx_: :-)
14:16:10 <amotoki> annp_: do we need to download the patches one by one?
14:16:27 <amotoki> annp_: does git review -d <top of the patch series>  work?
14:17:46 <annp_> amotoki, we've just git review -d ... This is enough.
14:18:05 <annp_> amotoki, we just need git review -d ...
14:18:14 <amotoki> annp_: I just wondered the github link uses git review -x. thanks
14:19:05 <annp_> amotoki, mlavalle, I'd like to share with you our current testing: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g24-cKkwjcAXxbXLTRyeCzu-QlpE3eKdseo8R0P0920/edit#heading=h.ze0krrxtev74
14:19:28 <mlavalle> annp_: that's helpful. THanks
14:19:31 <annp_> amotoki, mlavalle, hoangcx, thanks.
14:19:50 <hoangcx_> annp_: Really? I don't see related-change in gerrit UI, that means we need to download one by one? Or Am I missing something?
14:20:07 <mlavalle> In regards to multiple port binding, we had pretty good progress over the past week: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/live-migration-portbinding+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:20:36 <mlavalle> We are in the process of merging the big patch at the head of the series
14:21:36 <mlavalle> and the smaller patches seem to be on their way to merge on time
14:21:57 <mlavalle> Please take a look and help with them
14:22:48 <mlavalle> in regards with Port Forwarding, here's the series of patches https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/port_forwarding+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:23:14 <mlavalle> I am personally working my way through the last one, the agent side code
14:23:27 <slaweq> I will review those this week
14:23:41 <njohnston> +1
14:24:05 <mlavalle> Except one of the server side patches, where we still have a discussion on the usage of locks, it seems to me the patches is in pretty good shape
14:24:16 <mlavalle> are in ^^^
14:24:45 <mlavalle> so I think that if we focus reviewing attention, we have a good chance to merge this feature this cycle
14:25:09 <manjeets_> ++
14:27:07 <mlavalle> pjrusak_: any comments on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/subnet-onboard?
14:27:36 <pjrusak_> Hi, everyone
14:27:55 <mlavalle> pjrusak_: nevermind, it is not yours
14:28:05 <mlavalle> sorry for the confusion
14:28:14 <mlavalle> let's move on
14:28:18 <pjrusak_> Started working with spinning up dev env for myself. Went through hacking guide and got few question
14:28:28 <pjrusak_> to start with bug
14:28:40 <mlavalle> pjrusak_: let's address those questions in the channel
14:28:43 <mlavalle> thanks!
14:28:49 <pjrusak_> Wrote them yesterday on neutron channel
14:29:00 <mlavalle> ah, ok, we'll follow up
14:29:09 <pjrusak_> i can resent them later today
14:29:13 <mlavalle> ok
14:29:16 <njohnston> What is the status of policy-in-code?
14:29:24 <amotoki> I am really sorry I could not work on policy-in-code last week due to my poor health. my asthma hit me.....
14:29:29 <amotoki> I am trying to find a way to support policy-in-code without touching neutron-lib.
14:29:36 <amotoki> so far, neutron-lib code only requires policy.py in check_is_admin() and check_is_advsvc(),
14:29:38 <njohnston> I'm so sorry to hear that, amotoki
14:29:59 <amotoki> so I hope we need a change in neutron core.
14:30:32 <mlavalle> well, let's not be rash on those decisions
14:30:56 <mlavalle> I'll ping you later and we can talk about it
14:31:01 <amotoki> yes, that's true
14:31:13 <mlavalle> You are a valuable member of this team and we appreciate you a lot
14:31:17 <njohnston> Let me know if you need any assistance, amotoki
14:31:34 <amotoki> njohnston: thanks
14:32:09 * njohnston wonders if amotoki meant "change in neutron core" as in a code change in the core neutron server code as opposed to change in neutron core reviewer status
14:32:52 <amotoki> njohnston: i mean 'openstack/neutron' repo by 'neutron core'.
14:33:07 * slaweq is glad to hear that :)
14:33:09 <mlavalle> fwiw, that's good
14:33:09 <njohnston> good, that's what I thought :-)
14:33:10 <amotoki> non-client lib deadline this week is in my mind
14:34:03 <mlavalle> annp_: do you have anything to say about wsgi suppprt?
14:34:21 <annp_> hi again,
14:34:42 <annp_> In order to support WSGI server, here is list of patches https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/run-in-wsgi-server+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:35:46 <mlavalle> annp_: I reviewed one of them a couple of days ago. was it helpful?
14:35:57 <annp_> mlavalle, regards to your comments, I'm not sure where wait() is called.
14:36:10 <mlavalle> and I will keep an eye on that series this week
14:36:17 <mlavalle> encourgae the others to do the same
14:36:36 <slaweq> mlavalle: I will
14:36:45 <mlavalle> Thanks slaweq
14:36:51 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on
14:36:57 <mlavalle> #topic neutron-lib
14:36:58 <annp_> I’d like to keep current logic So we can simply update this one  like:
14:36:58 <annp_> done, not_done = waiters.wait_for_all(self.fts)
14:36:59 <annp_> if not not_done:
14:37:00 <annp_> del self.fts[:]
14:37:02 <annp_> What do you think so?
14:37:14 <mlavalle> annp_: let's discuss in gerrit
14:37:24 <annp_> mlavalle, ok. thanks.
14:37:37 <mlavalle> boden: did you make it back?
14:37:46 <boden> mlavalle hi yep I’m here
14:38:11 <mlavalle> stage is all yours boden
14:38:25 <boden> I saw you already mentioned (and reviewed) the neutron-lib release 1.18.0 patch; thanks for that
14:38:44 <mlavalle> thanks also to amotoki for +1ing it as well
14:39:27 <amotoki> that's the role of the release liaison :)
14:39:58 <boden> so the plan to get the neutron-lib RC ready for rocky is to release lib 1.18.0 (hopefuly today) and then bump neutron to use it… assuming there’s no issues (I don’t expect any) we can then create the stable/rocky branch for lib
14:40:18 <boden> in the meantime I didn’t plan on merging any neutron-lib py code, but api ref only changes should be fine
14:41:15 <boden> so that’s for the Rocky RC of neutron-lib… other than that some lib db consumption patches merged (thanks all) and so you will see some new ones start ot crop up in the next few days
14:41:24 <boden> … thats all I have unless others have comments/questions
14:42:12 <mlavalle> hongbin: do you have all you need for the work you are doing on API consistency?
14:42:27 <mlavalle> I mean, everything you need merged in neutron-lib
14:42:42 <hongbin> mlavalle: yes, all the neutron-lib patches are merged, thanks for that
14:43:12 <mlavalle> thanks to boden. Very disciplined and thorough, as usual ;-)
14:43:29 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on
14:43:38 <hongbin> boden: thanks :)
14:43:54 <boden> mlavalle hongbin thanks for all the help
14:44:09 <mlavalle> #topic CLI / SDK
14:44:18 <mlavalle> amotoki: any news on this topic?
14:44:21 <amotoki> next week is the feature freeze for client lib. I think we need to cut a new release.
14:44:51 <amotoki> At a quick look, I don't see any important pending patches.
14:45:06 <amotoki> if you have any, please raise it
14:45:51 <mlavalle> ok, let's move on
14:45:58 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs
14:46:45 <mlavalle> Last week out deputy was manjeets_. He wrote a very thorough report here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-July/132274.html
14:48:04 <mlavalle> hoangcx_: if you have a chance, could you take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1781354?
14:48:04 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1781354 in neutron "VPNaaS: IPsec siteconnection status DOWN while using IKE v2" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Dongcan Ye (hellochosen)
14:48:22 <mlavalle> we need some help triaging that one
14:48:34 <hoangcx_> mlavalle, yes. I will do it this week
14:49:21 <mlavalle> slaweq: maybe we can touch on https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1781915 in the next meeting ;-)
14:49:21 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1781915 in neutron "QoS (DSCP Mark IDs) – No correlation between the implemented functionality and design" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Nate Johnston (nate-johnston)
14:49:38 <slaweq> mlavalle: sure
14:49:57 <mlavalle> manjeets_: I will look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1782026
14:49:58 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1782026 in neutron "Routed provider network - DHCP agent failure" [Undecided,New]
14:50:00 <slaweq> but I think that njohnston already checked it and send fix for docs
14:50:12 <mlavalle> slaweq: ah cool
14:50:15 <njohnston> yes, and the main fix has already merged
14:50:39 <mlavalle> njohnston: great job. Thanks
14:50:39 <manjeets_> yea for 1781915 document was incomplete so operators didn't know about allowed dscp marks
14:51:55 <mlavalle> anything else you want to highlight manjeets_ ?
14:52:24 <manjeets_> thats it
14:52:38 <mlavalle> manjeets_: great job manjeets_. Thank you!
14:53:52 <mlavalle> This week's deputy is supposed to be lujinluo. I was having an offline conversation, though, with annp_, an aparently lujinlio has left her job with Fujitsu
14:54:18 <mlavalle> Since my duty week is only two weeks away, I will step in this week
14:54:33 <mlavalle> unless I hear from her
14:54:52 <mlavalle> #topic Docs
14:54:57 <slaweq> mlavalle: so I can get Yours then if You want
14:55:18 <mlavalle> slaweq: thanks. let's talk after the meeting
14:55:24 <slaweq> sure
14:55:29 <mlavalle> boden: anything this week on Docs
14:56:29 <mlavalle> I take that as a no
14:56:34 <mlavalle> #topic Open Agenda
14:56:47 <mlavalle> Anything else that should be shared with this team today?
14:56:55 <hongbin> i have one to bring up
14:57:13 <hongbin> i wonder if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574907/ is bound by the FFE next week?
14:58:00 <mlavalle> why wouldn't it?
14:58:33 <hongbin> if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574907/ is bound, i would need reviews in this week to make it on Rocky :)
14:58:56 <mlavalle> ok, let's also focus on this series of patches
14:59:04 <mlavalle> thanks for bringing it up?
14:59:20 <mlavalle> THanks everybody for attending!
14:59:36 <mlavalle> and let's focus on reviewing the code we discussed in this meeting!
14:59:42 <mlavalle> #endmeeting