21:00:03 <mlavalle> #startmeeting networking
21:00:04 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Nov 13 21:00:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:08 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
21:00:41 <mlavalle> Hi there!
21:00:55 <ihrachys> o/
21:00:59 <haleyb> hi
21:01:02 <slaweq> hi
21:01:32 <mlavalle> Today's agenda is here:
21:01:39 <mlavalle> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings
21:01:49 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements
21:02:27 <mlavalle> The only announcement I have to day is next milestone, Q-2, the week of December 4 to 8
21:02:48 <mlavalle> Any other announcements from the team I might be missing?
21:04:04 <mlavalle> ok, moving on
21:04:14 <mlavalle> #topic Blueprints
21:04:36 <mlavalle> These are the blueprints we are targeting for Q-2:
21:04:44 <mlavalle> #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/queens-2
21:05:42 <mlavalle> I am personally working on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/live-migration-portbinding
21:06:15 <mlavalle> I am working on a patchset to add the multiple port bindings functionality to ML2. Will update soon
21:06:44 <mlavalle> Problem is that I don't have an approver. The original one was with OSIC, so he is not around anymore
21:06:56 <mlavalle> any volunteers to be the approver?
21:07:37 <ihrachys> I wonder if jlibosva would be interested since he was looking into it.
21:07:44 <ihrachys> but if nothing else, I can probably do.
21:08:02 <ihrachys> I will ask Kuba ok?
21:08:37 <mlavalle> yeah, that's perfect. I'll ping him m yself tomorrow morning. If he is not available, I'll come back to you?
21:08:46 <mlavalle> no question ^^^^
21:09:13 <ihrachys> ok cool
21:09:16 <mlavalle> ihrachys: anything to share with the team about OVO?
21:09:29 <ihrachys> yeah
21:09:50 <ihrachys> there are two small patches that are worth nudging in for l3agent: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495810/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/501925/
21:10:21 <ihrachys> and also, to update, we had a breakage for midonet because of subnet OVO landed; the offending patch was reverted with: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519017/
21:10:32 <mlavalle> yeah, I was about to ask about it
21:10:33 <ihrachys> there seems to be a mess with how we register objects in OVO registry
21:10:50 <ihrachys> slaweq reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1731948 for that
21:10:50 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1731948 in neutron "Wrong OVO classes registered in some cases" [Medium,New]
21:11:03 <ihrachys> we will probably need to introduce a separate registry for neutron objects
21:11:33 <ihrachys> otherwise names clash between neutron and os-vif and it breaks the code, trying to use os-vif Route object for neutron object
21:11:38 <ihrachys> that's it
21:11:44 <mlavalle> ah ok
21:11:56 <mlavalle> I added the two patchsets ^^^^ to my pile
21:11:59 <slaweq> it's not only Route class, the same issue is with some others
21:12:09 <slaweq> but it fails on Route :)
21:12:17 <mlavalle> I had already +1ed one of them. I'll nudge it in later today
21:12:24 <ihrachys> slaweq, no sleep huh? yeah, thanks for the note.
21:12:24 <ihrachys> mlavalle, and to your question in the l3agent patch, OVO objects support __getattr__ as well as __getitem__
21:12:43 <mlavalle> ok, cool
21:12:46 <ihrachys> (well, OUR objects do)
21:12:50 <slaweq> ihrachys: :) it's too early
21:12:52 <mlavalle> LOL
21:13:26 <ihrachys> so plan for subnet is I will look at the registry bug, then revert the revert
21:13:47 <mlavalle> ack, thanks for the update
21:13:49 <ihrachys> EOM
21:14:04 <slaweq> yeah, my first OVO related patch lands and breaks so many things :)
21:14:18 <ihrachys> slaweq, not 'so many'. just midonet?
21:14:36 <mlavalle> don't be so harsh on yourself slaweq
21:14:42 <ihrachys> slaweq, though this may actually ask for additional test coverage in tree
21:15:00 <ihrachys> I thought we install os-vif with neutron. or not?
21:15:12 <slaweq> thx, I'm just joking :)
21:15:22 <ihrachys> oh we actually don't
21:15:40 <slaweq> ok, sorry
21:15:49 <ihrachys> anyway, sorry for taking so much time, we can move on
21:15:57 <mlavalle> ok
21:16:05 <mlavalle> regarding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/floating-ip-rate-limit
21:16:32 <mlavalle> I saw that haleyb reviewed https://review.openstack.org/453458
21:17:00 <mlavalle> haleyb: you ok with the addition of a new tc_lib for L3?
21:17:42 <haleyb> mlavalle: yes, just had those comments on it
21:17:52 <mlavalle> great, I am also ok with it
21:18:04 <mlavalle> he already responded to your comments
21:18:25 <mlavalle> any other updates to blueprints we should discuss today?
21:18:33 <haleyb> i will review again, think most was in one file
21:19:10 <mlavalle> ++
21:19:14 <mlavalle> moving on
21:19:29 <mlavalle> #topic Starter Approved RFEs
21:19:52 <mlavalle> We have three starter approved RFEs that we are advertising in this meeting every week:
21:20:13 <mlavalle> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1653932
21:20:13 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1653932 in neutron "[rfe] network router:external field not exported" [Wishlist,Triaged]
21:20:36 <mlavalle> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1689830
21:20:36 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1689830 in neutron "[RFE] Add attribute to the a port that lists the UUIDs of other ports that the port is allowed to impersonate" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Dongcan Ye (hellochosen)
21:20:52 <mlavalle> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1690438
21:20:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1690438 in neutron "[RFE] make get-me-a-network work with any network topology" [Wishlist,Triaged]
21:21:31 <mlavalle> These are RFEs that are considered entry level for new contributors. Hopefully they will be picked up be "newbies"
21:21:51 <mlavalle> I led an on-boarding session last week in Sydney
21:22:04 <mlavalle> had about 10 - 12 participants
21:22:19 <mlavalle> hopefully some of them will start contributing
21:22:49 <mlavalle> moving on
21:22:53 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs
21:23:16 <mlavalle> slaweq: want to update the team?
21:23:31 <slaweq> I sent today email with report from last week
21:23:43 <mlavalle> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124478.html
21:23:49 <slaweq> I don't know if I have something more to say
21:24:12 <slaweq> You can ask me about something if You want
21:24:12 <mlavalle> I added priority (Medium) to some of the bugs you were unsure about
21:24:26 <slaweq> thx mlavalle
21:24:38 <mlavalle> I understand you will dig deeper in a couple of them, right?
21:24:44 <slaweq> yes, I want
21:25:46 <mlavalle> and our bug deputy for this week is haleyb, so that email from slaweq will be very useful for the hand off
21:26:15 <haleyb> yes, thanks slaweq for that
21:26:36 <slaweq> no problem
21:27:00 <mlavalle> thanks also slaweq for fixes to docs related to bugs :-)
21:27:39 <mlavalle> #topic Docs
21:27:42 <slaweq> you welcome :)
21:29:17 <boden> hi
21:30:09 <boden> from a neutron-lib perspective, there’s quite a few NeutronLibImpact patches out there in neutron that should be ready to land
21:30:17 <boden> thanks to all for the reviews so far
21:30:38 <mlavalle> #undo
21:30:38 <openstack> Removing item from minutes: #topic Docs
21:30:46 <mlavalle> #topic neutron-lib
21:31:52 <boden> are you ready for me to give a quick update on neutron-lbi now?
21:32:59 <ihrachys> I guess?
21:33:20 <mlavalle> yes
21:33:24 <mlavalle> please
21:34:24 <boden> business as usual really.. a handful of NeutronLibImpact patches ready for review and a few more in the  pipeline: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+message:%22NeutronLibImpact%22
21:34:53 <boden> anything that does not have a -1 Workflow vote should be candidate for review
21:35:06 <mlavalle> that's been my assumption
21:35:47 <ihrachys> I usually also wait for +1 from jenkins
21:35:47 <boden> there are also still a handful of patches in the neutron-lib review queue that are ready for a +1 workflow vote https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron-lib+status:open
21:35:58 <boden> ihrachys: yeah good idea
21:36:16 * mlavalle tries to do the same
21:36:54 <boden> I was also hoping to get some core eyes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/518377/  when they get time… armax might be a good one to peek if he gets time this week
21:38:16 <boden> I don’t have anything else exicting, other than next week is thanksgiving
21:38:25 <mlavalle> yaay!
21:39:12 <mlavalle> thanks for the update :-)
21:39:17 <mlavalle> #topic Docs
21:39:26 <mlavalle> any updates here, boden?
21:39:49 <boden> mlavalle nothing exicting ATM
21:40:22 <mlavalle> cool, thanks
21:40:27 <mlavalle> let's move on
21:40:40 <mlavalle> #topic Migration to OSC
21:40:49 <mlavalle> amotoki: you around?
21:41:48 <mlavalle> I guess not
21:41:52 <mlavalle> let's move on
21:41:59 <mlavalle> #topic Open Agenda
21:42:11 <mlavalle> Anyone has a topic to discuss with the team?
21:42:56 <ihrachys> are icals for meetings fixed now?
21:43:20 <mlavalle> you mean the drivers meeting, right?
21:43:35 <mlavalle> so I talked to the infra team before the Summit
21:43:36 <ihrachys> yeah
21:43:56 <mlavalle> and they asked me to add the patchset to their zuulv3 etherpad
21:44:02 <mlavalle> where they are tracking issues
21:44:10 <mlavalle> aparently it was related
21:44:48 <mlavalle> #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Neutron_drivers_Meeting
21:45:04 <ihrachys> oh seems fixed now, good
21:45:06 <mlavalle> it seems fixed to me now
21:45:07 <ihrachys> sorry for bothering
21:45:13 <ihrachys> checked it a bunch of times before
21:45:24 * mlavalle got lucky
21:45:27 <mlavalle> LOL
21:46:05 <mlavalle> any other topics?
21:46:27 <ihrachys> not from me
21:46:52 <mlavalle> ok team, Thanks for attending
21:47:05 <mlavalle> #endmeeting