21:00:07 #startmeeting networking 21:00:07 \o 21:00:07 Meeting started Mon Mar 16 21:00:07 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 21:00:25 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings Agenda 21:00:32 #topic Announcements 21:00:45 o/ 21:00:46 Feature freeze is this week 21:00:55 #info Feature Freeze is this week 21:01:11 Given the gate issues we've had, if you want to be extra sure your stuff merges by Thursday, get it in the queue by tomorrow. 21:01:30 does deadline apply to merge time or approve time? 21:01:39 kevinbenton: Merge time 21:01:55 I expect some folks to ask for FFEs, I've already discussed with a few of you about that. 21:02:02 For now, lets see what we can merge this week. 21:02:07 And deal with FFEs post-Thursday. 21:02:17 #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/kilo-3 21:02:25 ^^^^ is your review list 21:02:30 Please try to focus there and not just randomly in gerrit :) 21:02:40 Any other announcements for the team? 21:02:58 can I make an announcement> 21:03:07 Sukhdev: Please! 21:03:49 Wanted to let the wider team know that L2 Gateway team has come with the initial implementation of L2 Gateway api 21:04:00 and it is ready for testing by wider community 21:04:04 #info The L2 gateway team has finalized the L2 gateway API 21:04:08 Sukhdev: Cool! 21:04:16 #link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW 21:04:19 Sukhdev: cool, what's the backend for the ref impl? 21:04:37 salv-orlando: OVSDB 21:04:44 Sukhdev: Nice nice nice! 21:04:47 Sukhdev: great thanks! 21:04:59 We would like folks to jump in and give it a test drive 21:05:14 #info L2 Gateway team would love to get feedback 21:05:28 Sukhdev and team: very cool! Any other announcements from anyone? 21:05:46 OK, lets move along then. 21:05:48 #topic Bugs 21:06:02 enikanorov enikanorov__ can't join us today, but he wanted us to highlight a few bugs 21:06:11 Like this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1432065 21:06:12 Launchpad bug 1432065 in neutron "DBDeadlock: (OperationalError) (1213, 'Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction') 'DELETE FROM ipallocationpools WHERE ipallocationpools.id" [Critical,Confirmed] 21:06:29 not the first time I see this failure 21:06:55 salv-orlando: Any ideas, or it's just a familiar face? 21:06:58 we know the root cause - but we love bikeshedding on whether it's better to take the hit for the deadlock or have a non locking approach 21:07:08 salv-orlando: Ah, right. 21:07:16 * mestery proposes we bikeshed on the review rather than here in the meeting 21:07:22 I'm pretty sure I saw something from rossella_s that even if not elegant would have solved the issue 21:07:31 It's a more intimate bike shedding that way 21:07:38 * markmcclain puts away his bucket of blue paint 21:07:44 pink 21:07:44 lol 21:07:55 Also, this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1419723 21:07:56 Launchpad bug 1419723 in neutron "DBDuplicateEntry when creating secgroup" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Eugene Nikanorov (enikanorov) 21:08:28 Handled byt this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164463/ 21:08:50 salv-orlando are you referring some patch that I had to retry to operation or to the one that removes the lock? 21:09:09 rossella_s: the retry one 21:09:50 salv-orlando I can start working on that again if there's consensus...there have been lots of discussions about that strategy 21:10:27 rossella_s: consensus there will be once the bike shed has a good coat of painting 21:10:47 salv-orlando: :) 21:10:50 lol 21:11:08 rossella_s: mestery asked us to move discussion to ML/gerrit/launchpad. Possibly bug report on launchpad as it seems the most rcent point of discussion 21:11:16 salv-orlando: ++ 21:11:25 Any other bugs the team should discuss this week? 21:11:38 Well, I''ll just mention this one here: 21:11:38 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1432091 21:11:39 Launchpad bug 1432091 in tempest "tempest javelin is busted" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) 21:11:53 That's the grenade bug from the weekend which is now fixed but which stopped neutron development for the weekend and today 21:12:25 * mestery thinks most people are familiar with that one 21:12:25 Any other bugs? 21:12:30 that is one great way of taking a weekend + monday off 21:12:35 break the gate on a friday 21:12:45 It was a brilliant plan salv-orlando. 21:13:22 brilliant, and i hear that the tears of developers is good for the complexion. 21:13:30 lol 21:13:33 OK, lets move on 21:13:38 dougwig: sell that 21:13:48 #topic Docs 21:13:55 emagana: Around? 21:14:02 mestery: Yes! 21:14:04 And if not, pc_m, wanted to bringup the VPN API docs here in this slot 21:14:07 I take full responsability for not having reverted the culprit in the first place 21:14:11 :( 21:14:20 * mestery shakes his fist at armax 21:14:33 mestery: just a short networking docs meeting last friday 21:14:35 and EmilienM 21:14:36 :) 21:14:43 cool, thanks emagana! 21:15:14 keep working on migrating work from github .rst to the new framework 21:15:18 mestery: Wondering if old stuff it cached/saved somewhere 21:15:26 About those VPN API docs: I suggested to pc_m he ping you emagana so we can work to get them added to the official API docs somehow. 21:15:50 mestery: I already talked to pc_m.. Actually, he conatcted me 21:15:58 contacted* 21:16:04 emagana: Sweet, great! 21:16:09 mestery: Have example REST requests and responses but rest of the content is gone. 21:16:25 pc_m: I don't know how that happened, it's weird 21:16:45 mestery: hence hoping if anyone knows if we have a cached/backed up version somewhere of the wiki 21:16:51 pc_m mestery: I am sure that the references are gone but the files shoudl be still around 21:17:09 pc_m: Ok, lets see if we can find those. 21:17:11 Can only find the JSON files. Nothing more. 21:17:26 pc_m: We can do that post meeting, or even more likely, post FF this week :) 21:17:32 emagana: Any other doc updates for the team? 21:17:33 (in the old repo) 21:17:36 mestery: Sure 21:17:38 emagana, pc_m I think I was already asked this question? 21:17:49 mestery: not really, slow process :-( 21:17:50 api reference repos have moved into openstack-attic 21:18:01 all content copied into openstack/neutron-specs 21:18:16 rendering might not work as expected, but all the content is there 21:18:18 salv-orlando: Nice! 21:18:23 and if not, it's in openstack-attic 21:18:25 pc_m: ^^^^ 21:18:49 salv-orlando: Will talk to you off-line. I can only fine some of the info. 21:18:55 (in the attic) 21:19:08 pc_m: it should all be there in the history 21:19:16 we just made the repo read only 21:19:21 that is the only change 21:19:50 will ping you guys. I'll look again, but can't find info. 21:19:54 okay 21:20:00 thanks for the help anteaya! 21:20:12 sure 21:20:32 #topic Open Discussion 21:20:41 Given the gate failure and FF, that's all I had this week 21:20:54 pc_m: i found some API contennts in the history of https://github.com/openstack-attic/netconn-api/ 21:20:56 I propose we continue focusing on landing the remaining K3 code 21:21:01 thanks mestery for giving us back 40 minutes 21:21:08 salv-orlando: yw :) 21:21:12 time we can spend waiting on the gate :/ 21:21:25 marun: Well, there's that ... 21:21:25 while we wait can we discuss paint colors :p 21:21:26 marun: it's called "contemplating the gate" 21:21:54 chartreuse! 21:21:58 can we make a feature branch for pecan work? 21:22:05 marun: that's a yellow right? 21:22:15 kevinbenton: sure, why not 21:22:18 kevinbenton: Yes 21:22:23 anteaya: halfway between yellow and green 21:22:30 kevinbenton: do we need one? 21:22:33 amotoki: Yeah, but search for ipsec, all you'll find is .json files. 21:22:50 marun: ew 21:22:58 anteaya: my feelings exactly 21:23:03 lol 21:23:04 marun: I think perhaps kevinbenton want to have something he can test in flight and allow other people to drop commits on it? 21:23:08 markmcclain: the nice thing about a feature branch is we can turn on pecan right away and get all of the jobs testing against it 21:23:12 osrry marun, that was for markmcclain 21:23:13 anteaya: but sometimes you have to set the stage for what you really want ;) 21:23:13 salv-orlando: markmcclain you mean? 21:23:22 marun: the set up 21:23:34 markmcclain: rather than dropping it in and having special instructions to enable it 21:23:43 +1 for feature branch 21:23:48 kevinbenton: Ack, ping me and we'll make it happen 21:23:50 kevinbenton: yeah… there's that… more concerned about the syncing of the two 21:23:57 it would be good to see how faster iteration works out in practice 21:24:02 markmcclain: That will be my cross to carry :| 21:24:06 markmcclain: like conflicts? 21:24:17 markmcclain: isn't perestroika supposed to save us? 21:24:28 marun: yes 21:24:29 so far the code i have been touching hasn't had changes since the stone age 21:24:31 * marun looks pointedly at salv-orlando 21:24:33 marun: I would ask that to the russians ;) 21:24:36 so i don't suspect a lot of conflicts 21:24:50 marun: that perestroika thing is haunting me 21:25:02 #action mestery Get a feature branch for pecan work 21:25:05 salv-orlando: you touched it! 21:25:06 Look at that, an action item! 21:25:10 you folks really don't want 40 minutes do you 21:25:13 OK, thanks for coming folks! 21:25:14 I did just file a spec in utah for relieving somebody else from the pressure of working on it!!!! 21:25:16 #endmeeting