21:01:38 <mestery> #startmeeting networking
21:01:39 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Jun 16 21:01:38 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:01:40 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:01:42 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'networking'
21:01:54 <mestery> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings Agenda
21:02:16 <mestery> Juno1 was released last week
21:02:22 <mestery> #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-1
21:02:31 <mestery> Great work by all involved!
21:03:09 <mestery> I have started grooming the Juno-2 milestone as well now
21:03:33 <mestery> I also wanted to mention the upcoming mid cycle sprint for nova-network parity
21:03:45 <mestery> Any other announcements for the team?
21:04:18 <mestery> #link markmcclain1 don't forget link to tarball: http://tarballs.openstack.org/neutron/neutron-2014.2.b1.tar.gz
21:04:32 <mestery> Thanks for reminding me markmcclain1 :)
21:05:09 <markmcclain1> mestery: you're welcome
21:05:22 <mestery> #topic Bugs
21:05:39 <mestery> enikanorov has listed some bugs we should be aware of
21:05:50 <mestery> I encourage people to view the agenda
21:06:16 <mestery> It looks like arosen1 has also linked nova bugs we should be reviewing
21:07:22 <ihrachyshka> speaking of locks, we in Red Hat also got another Lock wait timeout bug for floatingips a day ago, I was going to investigate it
21:07:47 <ihrachyshka> looks like some general issue (I'll report my specific failure upstream tomorrow)
21:07:48 <mestery> Thanks ihrachyshka
21:08:08 <mestery> Any other bugs the team should be aware of this week?
21:08:34 <salv-orlando> I have a suspect we already have bugs for all three reported by enikanorov. I think there is also an oustanding patch for one of the three
21:09:01 <salv-orlando> beyond that - no other bug we should be aware of on my side.
21:09:12 <mestery> Thanks salv-orlando
21:09:21 <enikanorov> salv-orlando: hmm, i've looked through existing bugs, they were alittle bit different
21:09:33 <enikanorov> (update operation vs create, or such differences)
21:09:49 <enikanorov> but i may be wrong
21:09:53 <salv-orlando> I remember exactly those three instances
21:10:02 <salv-orlando> let’s take that offline
21:10:17 <enikanorov> sure. also feel free to mark as duplicate
21:10:18 <salv-orlando> I think you want to sleep after the meeting as it’s 1AM foryou I guess
21:10:34 <enikanorov> honestly i want to sleep right now :)
21:10:45 <mestery> #topic Team Discussion Items
21:10:57 <mestery> Is prad here?
21:11:34 <mestery> prad wanted to discuss a patch focused an helping ceilometer
21:11:42 <mestery> But if he's not here we will move on
21:12:46 <mestery> #topic Nova Parity
21:12:51 <markmcclain1> hi
21:12:53 <mestery> Hi
21:13:02 <markmcclain1> so obondarev has been busy
21:13:10 <markmcclain1> and posted a WIP for the nova extension
21:13:21 <mestery> Nice!
21:13:26 <markmcclain1> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100265
21:14:18 <mestery> I encourage neutron devs to review that
21:14:37 <markmcclain1> the WIP is early, so he'll be adding more features to it
21:15:13 <mestery> Any other updates here markmcclain1?
21:15:21 <markmcclain1> thats all for this week
21:15:28 <mestery> Thanks!
21:15:41 <mestery> #topic Docs
21:15:58 <mestery> emagana: hi!
21:16:05 <emagana> mestery: hi there!
21:16:20 <emagana> no updates from the docs side
21:16:43 <mestery> Good to hear things moving smoothly there emagana. :)
21:16:44 <emagana> But...
21:16:59 <emagana> the same recommendation that last week, we need to be sure that we have either bugs or bps filed against neutron
21:17:40 <emagana> mestery: I would like to see all the new staff with "DocImpact" added on the commit message
21:17:41 <mestery> Good reminder emagana.
21:17:59 <emagana> besides that, all major bugs are assigned
21:18:07 <mestery> Yes, people should be cognizant of that.
21:18:10 <mestery> Thanks!
21:18:19 <amotoki_> emagana: do what kind of changes need DocImpact flag?
21:18:51 <emagana> amotoki_: anything that changes the way we use/deploy/configure neutron staff
21:19:03 <emagana> amotoki_: and new features like DVR for instance
21:19:38 <amotoki_> in my understanding the configuration guide is built automatically, so i don't think DocImpact is necessary for patches which only affects the configuration guide.
21:20:47 <emagana> amotoki_: It would not affect the tag anyway, I would prefer to tag as invalid a bug that missing a change
21:21:23 <amotoki_> emagana: sounds good. we need to take care of DocImpact flag more.
21:21:33 <emagana> mestery: that's all
21:21:40 <mestery> Thanks emagana
21:21:42 <yamamoto> is this uptodate? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/DocImpact
21:21:54 <mestery> emagan: ^^^
21:22:05 <mestery> emagana: ^^^
21:22:21 <emagana> yamamoto: not 100% sure
21:22:35 <markmcclain1> yamahata: last edit was the 11th, so I'm guessing yes
21:22:37 <emagana> let me bring that with the docs team
21:22:43 <markmcclain1> yamamoto: ^^^
21:23:07 <mestery> #topic Tempest
21:23:17 <mestery> mlavalle: hi!
21:23:23 <mlavalle> hi!
21:23:56 <mlavalle> we added the 27th api test to the tempest repo this week, out of the 28 that we targeted in January
21:24:09 <mestery> Nice!
21:24:41 <mlavalle> the one remaining to merge is actually mine….. I am having somo tough times with Jenkins, but we will get there
21:25:23 <mlavalle> I've been wrting a rst file that will be added to the tempest repo, with the tutorial to develop scenario tests for Neutron
21:25:40 <nati_ueno_i> Awesome
21:25:42 <mestery> that will be very helpful mlavalle!
21:25:55 <mlavalle> it will become part of the tempest docs
21:26:28 <mlavalle> it's taking a little longer than expected because I am targeting new developers, so I walk them through the classes and all the details
21:27:14 <mlavalle> I have been talking to the LBaaS guys at Rackspace to make sure we have a new api document to start implementing tests
21:27:53 <mlavalle> and finally I had a nice conversation with sc68cal a while ago. he is developing some tests for ipv4 and ipv6 on proviuder networks
21:27:54 <mestery> Awesome! I expect we can talk more on that in person this week too.
21:28:10 <mlavalle> that's all I have
21:28:25 <mestery> Thanks!
21:28:53 <mlavalle> mestery: I'll see you tomorrow here
21:29:04 <mestery> #topic Advanced Services
21:29:16 <mestery> SumitNaiksatam: hi!
21:29:21 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: hi
21:29:32 <SumitNaiksatam> we are still waiting of approval of blueprint specs
21:29:47 <SumitNaiksatam> the most notable among them is enikanorov’s flavors bp
21:29:49 <mestery> Yes.
21:30:04 <SumitNaiksatam> #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90070
21:30:05 <mestery> I was looking at that one earlier today
21:30:13 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: great, thanks
21:30:32 <SumitNaiksatam> our hope is that we have can move forward on this by the end of this week
21:30:39 <mestery> I encourage people to review the flavor BP ^^^
21:31:03 <SumitNaiksatam> i propose that we have a decisive conversation on this during this week’s adv services’ IRC on wednesday
21:31:34 <SumitNaiksatam> at least a couple of other bp specs (serivice insertion and traffic steering) are also pretty ripe
21:32:03 <mestery> Sounds good I will do my best to make that meeting
21:32:03 <SumitNaiksatam> fyi  - #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/AdvancedServices/JunoPlan
21:32:21 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: nice, i know you will be in the LBaas sprint as well
21:32:37 <mestery> Yes :)
21:32:48 <SumitNaiksatam> thats it for this, unless there are questions for the adv services’ team
21:33:03 * mestery waits for a bit for questions
21:33:49 <mestery> #topic IPV6
21:33:51 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: i think cue for you to proceed :-)
21:33:58 <mestery> sc68cal: hi!
21:35:10 <mestery> #topic ML2
21:35:26 <mestery> rkukura: Jow goes NP prioritization?
21:35:26 <rkukura> not much to report yet
21:35:30 <mestery> How
21:35:33 <mestery> BP
21:35:38 <rkukura> we’re still working on prioritizing BPs and reviewing specs
21:35:57 <Sukhdev> check out  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tracking_ML2_Subgroup_Reviews
21:36:02 <sc68cal> sorry, was afk for a moment and missed my queue
21:36:04 <sc68cal> *cue
21:36:18 <mestery> sc68cal: well come cback to you
21:36:55 <mestery> rkukura: Thanks for prioritizing those ML2 BPs
21:36:58 <mestery> It helps
21:37:04 <rkukura> right, we are using this wiki to track reviews within the subteam prior to recruiting core reviewers
21:37:37 <mestery> Code and spec reviews?
21:37:38 <rkukura> that’s all I have - Sukhdev, anything else?
21:37:57 <Sukhdev> rkukura: no, we are good
21:38:07 <rkukura> mestery: I think that is the plan
21:38:10 <mestery> Thanks ML2 folks!
21:38:22 <mestery> #topic IPv6
21:38:30 <mestery> sc68cal: hi!
21:38:47 <sc68cal> hello
21:39:01 <sc68cal> So there's a couple big items on the agenda that I listed today
21:39:21 <sc68cal> we had a meeting today with mestery and markmcclain1 regarding the API, as well as BPs targeted for j-2
21:39:36 <mestery> Yes that was a helpful meeting
21:40:03 <sc68cal> I still have some concerns about the radvd and dnsmasq stuff, but it is primarily around getting somthing done in the juno timeframe
21:40:55 <sc68cal> I think at this point I'll let people digest what I've put on the wiki page
21:40:59 <mestery> That may warrant another meeting :)
21:41:07 <sc68cal> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#IPv6_.28sc68cal.29
21:41:34 <sc68cal> hopefully we can get a spec created quikcly for the radvd change
21:41:35 <mestery> Thanks sc68cal!
21:41:39 <sc68cal> thx
21:41:40 <mestery> Yes
21:42:07 <mestery> #topic Group Policy
21:42:22 <mestery> SumitNaiksatam: hi again!
21:42:32 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: indeed, hi again
21:42:44 <SumitNaiksatam> we are getting some good coverage with the intial set of patches
21:42:46 <mestery> I see new patches pushed which is great!
21:42:49 <mestery> Yes
21:42:56 <SumitNaiksatam> i meant review coverage
21:43:02 <SumitNaiksatam> more patches are on the way
21:43:10 <SumitNaiksatam> rkukura: you want to chime in as well?
21:43:20 <rkukura> OK
21:43:51 <rkukura> The 2nd series of GP patches maps the initial set of GP resources to neutron resources
21:44:09 <rkukura> These should be pushed for review over the next few days
21:44:40 <mestery> Thanks rkukura
21:45:31 <mestery> Anything else on GBP for the team?
21:45:49 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: we also good discussions on UT and testing
21:46:01 <mestery> Very good !
21:46:12 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: i believe we have consensus on moving forward based on everyone’s input
21:46:34 <mestery> Great!
21:46:47 <SumitNaiksatam> fy- please join weekly meetings - #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron_Group_Policy
21:47:10 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: that shuold be it for this week, thanks for giving us the time here
21:47:21 <yamamoto> GBP == GP ?
21:47:27 <mestery> Thanks SumitNaiksatam and team!
21:47:29 <SumitNaiksatam> yamahata: yes
21:47:42 <SumitNaiksatam> yamamoto: yes
21:48:00 <yamamoto> thank you
21:48:19 <mestery> #topic FWaaS
21:48:32 <mestery> SumitNaiksatam: we meet again :)
21:48:41 <SumitNaiksatam> mestery: ha :-)
21:48:48 <mestery> ;)
21:48:51 <salv-orlando> GBP=Great British Pound
21:49:00 <SumitNaiksatam> we have a high priority bug whose review is curently blocked: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90575/
21:49:38 <SumitNaiksatam> we also have a blueprint spec in review for “service objects”: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94133
21:49:59 <SumitNaiksatam> the expectation is that service objects will be applicable beyond just FWaaS
21:50:05 <SumitNaiksatam> please review if you get a chance
21:50:18 <mestery> Yes I encourage folks to review that
21:50:22 <SumitNaiksatam> and we would like to make progress with the high priority bug noted about
21:50:26 <SumitNaiksatam> *above
21:50:41 <SumitNaiksatam> thats it from the FWaaS team
21:50:46 <markmcclain1> SumitNaiksatam: I'll take another look at the bug
21:50:56 <SumitNaiksatam> markmcclain1: thanks much!
21:51:05 <SumitNaiksatam> markmcclain1: i also need to revisit it :-)
21:51:12 <mestery> Thanks!
21:51:30 <mestery> #topic Open Discussion
21:51:45 <mestery> anteaya: here?
21:51:54 <mestery> Your item is up now.
21:51:55 <anteaya> yes
21:51:58 <mestery> Ok
21:52:00 <anteaya> what did I have
21:52:15 <mestery> DriverLog and unreliable info
21:52:26 <anteaya> oh yeah
21:52:33 <anteaya> driverlog is unrelable
21:52:34 <mestery> Did we cover that earlier today at 3rd party meeting?
21:52:36 <anteaya> don't use it
21:52:38 <anteaya> yes
21:52:40 <mestery> :)
21:52:42 <mestery> Ok
21:52:46 <anteaya> and last week too I thought
21:52:48 <mestery> I encourage folks to read the logs
21:52:52 <mestery> Ok
21:52:56 <anteaya> read the logs
21:52:56 <mestery> No worries
21:53:01 <anteaya> sorry
21:53:05 <mestery> Any other items from folks?
21:53:14 <amotoki_> does anyone know the status of multi-node testing/devstack?
21:53:31 <mestery> In the gate?
21:53:33 <anteaya> well it was discussed last release
21:53:40 <mestery> It's not there yet
21:53:43 <anteaya> some people were working on it with sdague
21:53:52 <anteaya> lately crickets as far as I know
21:54:17 <amotoki_> i think we need to move forward it to support DVR or some other stuff.
21:54:26 <anteaya> amotoki_: infra is good with that
21:54:32 <mestery> Agreed amotoki_
21:54:41 <anteaya> amotoki_: put an item on tomorrow's infra agenda
21:54:47 <mestery> I will sync with carl_baldwin when he's back
21:54:54 <mestery> And figure that out with infra as well
21:54:56 <anteaya> I will dig through logs to see what was discussed last release
21:55:03 <amotoki_> thanks
21:55:07 <anteaya> np
21:55:35 <mestery> If there is nothing else well close early today.
21:55:41 <mestery> Thanks everyone!
21:55:42 <marun> I think we need multi-node nova network testing
21:55:45 <ihrachyshka> ehm... I also encourage people to check remaining oslo-messaging patches at: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/oslo-messaging,n,z Some of those patches are already in the tree or in gate now, but still lots of them (and the most important) waiting in the queue for review. So please criticise! :)
21:55:54 <marun> and then we can pass those tests with dvr
21:55:58 <marun> we shouldn't focus testing only dvr
21:56:04 <anteaya> marun: infra wants multi-node for any testing
21:56:12 <mestery> Multi ode
21:56:18 <anteaya> not just dvr of flavour of the month
21:56:20 <marun> anteaya: testing -> we need tests to actually take advantage of that
21:56:28 <anteaya> marun: agreed
21:56:51 <marun> anteaya: violent agreement ;)
21:57:02 <anteaya> I'm all done with violence
21:57:10 <anteaya> weak is the best I can muster today
21:57:12 * mestery loves it when there is agreement
21:57:24 <anteaya> maybe tomorrow
21:57:32 <mestery> Ok thanks folks, see you all in channel and next week!
21:57:40 <mestery> #endmeeting