21:01:40 #startmeeting networking 21:01:41 Meeting started Mon May 26 21:01:40 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:44 The meeting name has been set to 'networking' 21:01:48 we have quorum of cores? 21:02:09 markmcclain: You, me, rkukura, salv-orlando, armax ... we may be one short. :) 21:02:31 SumitNaiksatam amotoki carl_baldwin arosen1: ping 21:02:39 pong, hi. 21:02:48 the new core to the rescue :) 21:02:49 mestery: carl counts now :) 21:02:58 :-) 21:03:04 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings Agenda 21:03:07 #topic Announcements 21:03:24 markmcclain: You gave Carl's promotion to core away early on me. :) 21:03:32 I'd like to welcome carl_baldwin to Neutron core! 21:03:40 carl_baldwin: congrats 21:03:53 mestery: oops 21:03:57 carl_baldwin: congrats 21:03:59 Thanks, I’m very glad to be on the team. It is a great team. 21:04:19 carl_baldwin: The team is excited to have you onboard! 21:04:33 I'd also like to highlight the two mid-cycles sprints in the agenda for people as well. 21:04:48 Ideally, it would be good to get one more core other than markmcclain and myself at hte LBaaS sprint in SAT in June. 21:05:07 Looks like we have a good number of people attending the nova-networking parity sprint in MN in July as well! 21:05:42 Any other announcements for the team from anyone? 21:06:05 First meeting ever... Does that count? 21:06:19 TheDamkot: Absolutely! Welcome! 21:06:27 Thanks 21:06:46 #topic Bugs 21:07:11 Per the discussion from last week, I still need to get with jaypipes to document the MySQL Galera issue being discussed on the mailing list. 21:07:38 Are there any other bugs the team should be aware of at the moment? 21:07:51 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1322945 ? 21:07:52 Launchpad bug 1322945 in neutron "Attaching a IPv6 private subnet to a L3 Router, breaks it and its IPv4 Floating IPs" [High,New] 21:08:39 Thanks for bringing that one up enikanorov, I have not read it yet. 21:09:19 Hello 21:09:20 How can someone who is almost 30 and never had a job get one? I have been applying just to be told I am not what they are looking for or they are not hiring. 21:10:02 I also wanted to mention in this section of hte meeting that we have a new "Neutron Bug Czar". enikanorov has volunteered for this role. 21:10:16 enikanorov: Thank you for doing this, this will be nice to have someone taking this on! 21:10:22 so in regards to 1322945 it is not going to work anyway 21:10:32 we do not activate v4 forwarding 21:10:45 oops… v6 21:11:01 markmcclain: Can you put those notes in the bug? 21:11:16 mestery: yes will do 21:11:28 markmcclain: Thanks! 21:11:29 sc68cal and team should be addressing this 21:12:23 OK, any other bugs to discuss right now before we move on? 21:13:01 not yet 21:13:06 thanks enikanorov 21:13:22 emagana is out today, so we'll skip Docs updates for this week. 21:13:29 #topic Nova Network Parity 21:13:39 markmcclain: Hi! 21:13:45 hi 21:14:01 I see one update in the agenda here around the DB migration meeting 21:14:08 right 21:14:23 Cool, anything else? 21:14:25 the team is meeting Tuesday at 1300UTC for the next two weeks 21:14:37 Great! 21:14:47 that work should enable us to get grenade working properly 21:15:06 that's all I have since a few other contributors were on post summit holiday 21:15:14 markmcclain: Thank you! 21:15:26 #topic Tempest 21:15:37 mlavalle: Hi, you wanted to update us on some tempest items today? 21:15:39 markmcclain: I just updated https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-nova-parity with the latest status of api tests 21:15:54 mlavalle: great 21:16:12 mestery: to keep it short and sweet, just to let you know that over the past week we merged another 3 api tests 21:16:22 mlavalle: Great news! 21:16:38 I am also writing the spec in qa-specs for the scenarios we will implement in JKuno 21:17:07 mlavalle: That's great! Once that's posted, please share in our meeting so Neutron people can review that as well. 21:17:09 and I will keep and eye on nova parity to see how else I can help 21:17:25 that's all for today 21:17:32 Thanks mlavalle! 21:18:33 I'm unsure if the other sub-teams have updated their agendas just yet, so I was thinking we could move into Open Discussion now unless someone has something from a sub-team they want to share today. 21:18:50 mestery: One thing. 21:19:02 carl_baldwin: Yes, please do! 21:19:10 * mestery also realizes carl_baldwin did update his section. :) 21:19:19 DVR is heavy on my mind. We’ve created a how-to page. 21:19:27 #topic DVR 21:19:31 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DVR/HowTo 21:19:35 carl_baldwin: awesome 21:19:37 carl_baldwin: Awesome! 21:19:51 carl_baldwin, nice :-) 21:19:53 It doesn’t have much yet but I’m going to be working with Swami’s team on it this week. 21:19:55 carl_baldwin: I'd like to try this out in practice as well, thanks for sharing! 21:20:20 Anyone interested in getting their hands dirty can contact us to pitch in. 21:20:45 That’s all I had. Everything else is up on the team wiki page. 21:20:52 carl_baldwin: Thanks! 21:20:58 Thank you. 21:21:04 #topic Open Discussion 21:21:21 I know ihrachyshka had something on osl.messaging to discuss here. 21:21:30 *oslo.messaging 21:21:36 oslo.messaging port stuff, I wanted to inform you about it and have some questions 21:21:46 ihrachyshka: Please go ahead. 21:22:04 How can someone who is almost 30 and never had a job get one? I have been applying just to be told I am not what they are looking for or they are not hiring. 21:22:24 so the patch is at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75861/ , it's still WIP though mostly working (I have two issues unsolved - one with extensions not unloaded during UTs, another one about RPC version in LBAAS set incorrect) 21:22:45 we've discussed the patch with markmcclain today, he had some ideas re: future review 21:23:02 currently the patch is unreviewable because it's too large (+1981, -7816) 21:23:39 so that's about information (if anyone want to help me with debugging the remaining issues, don't hesitate to ask for details in person) 21:23:46 as for questions: 21:24:21 1. this is a blueprint based patch, so does it mean we'll need to have a detailed spec pushed first? salv-orlando talked about possible exception for this 21:25:09 seems like a very lightweight one would be possible 21:25:20 * markmcclain offers to assist writing 21:25:29 I agree with markmcclain, I think a small BP would be good to have for this. 21:25:38 ok 21:25:41 markmcclain: thanks! 21:26:07 #action markmcclain to help ihrachyshka write the oslo.messaging spec. 21:26:11 2. oslo.messaging does not have fake executor, so when we run UTs, we really invoke rpc listeners, and neutron currently does not have a way to stop listeners, so they probably sit there slowing down the whole run 21:26:37 How can someone who is almost 30 and never had a job get one? I have been applying just to be told I am not what they are looking for or they are not hiring.+ 21:26:44 markmcclain said before that we are going to revisit plugins api to handle this among other things, but I don't know the current status 21:27:15 there was an idea to stop listeners on class destruction, but I guess that's not the best thing to do since python does not guarantee much in case of __del__ 21:27:27 ihrachyshka: yep we will put in the interim we should determine a solution since this will impact icehouse testing too 21:27:34 ihrachyshka: why can’t the calls to invoke the listeners be mocked out? 21:28:00 kevinbenton: +1 21:28:05 kevinbenton: +1 21:28:31 kevinbenton: good idea. by changing BaseTestCase, right? 21:28:41 ihrachyshka: yeah 21:28:43 we don't want this to be per-test case, right 21:28:59 ihrachyshka: because this will be used in many cases 21:29:14 yes, I know, that's why I clarify :) 21:29:18 most plugins have a base test class 21:29:25 so we should be able to add it there 21:29:31 ok, good, I'll check the approach this week and update you on the matter 21:29:48 this would make stop_rpc_listener() not needed 21:30:12 markmcclain: you mean, not the VERY base class? some plugin specific? 21:30:32 yes not all plugins use RPC 21:30:39 or you mean we should strive isolating mocking to plugins tests if possible 21:31:09 good, I see. so that's a very valuable idea, thanks again kevinbenton 21:31:43 so basically that's all for oslo.messaging. again, if anyone wants to help me with remaining stuff, I would be glad :) 21:32:02 ihrachyshka: Thanks for the update on oslo.messging! 21:32:12 mestery: as regards to sub team updates, for the advanced services framework, and fwaas, the progress is mostly waiting on review of blueprint specs 21:32:28 SumitNaiksatam: Got it, thanks! 21:32:36 also on group policy, we will reorder the patches 21:32:48 so that endpoint groups lands first 21:32:57 and that way it can be tested to the driver layer 21:33:10 you should see it shortly - just FYI 21:33:54 Thanks for the update on GBP SumitNaiksatam! 21:34:10 sure 21:34:20 I was hoping to keep today's meeting a bit shorter than normal, looks as if I may have succeeded. :) 21:34:30 Unless anyone has anything else, I will give you all 26 minutes back! 21:34:39 mestery: +1 ;-) 21:34:47 sounds like a good reason to discuss flavors! ;-) 21:34:48 I’d gladly head off to bed 21:34:52 mestery: thanks for the extra halt hour of sleep 21:34:59 Ha! 21:35:01 kebray: ha! :-) 21:35:05 * ihrachyshka rushes to my bed ;) 21:35:06 kevinbenton: :-) 21:35:11 OK, thanks everyone! Keep up the reviews and remember to signup for a mid-cycle sprintg! 21:35:14 #endmeeting