14:04:09 #startmeeting network_common_flow_classifier 14:04:10 Meeting started Tue May 16 14:04:09 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is igordcard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:04:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:04:13 The meeting name has been set to 'network_common_flow_classifier' 14:04:57 agenda: 14:05:02 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_16_May_2017 14:05:48 #topic Spec status 14:06:58 the updated v15 has been reviewed by ihar, sean, louis and thomas... I haven't yet finished replying to everything but hope to do it soon 14:07:22 does anyone want to discuss anything that hasn't been brought up in the spec yet? 14:07:40 I'm good 14:08:12 same here, did not update as there was nothing to add/-1 for me 14:08:34 most recent reviews have been close to "looks good" 14:08:51 thats good 14:10:21 good good, I think now is mainly about polishing technical details that might still influence the API or usability 14:11:43 was talking to kevinbenton at the summit, and as soon as there's a general consistent agreement on this spec, it can be merged and the neutron-classifier repo made available 14:12:46 igordcard: So the spec is going to be merged? will we still put it in a dev ref in neutron classifier repo? 14:13:07 davidsha: yes to both I'd say 14:13:20 cool! 14:13:34 davidsha: the dev ref will will evolve to reflect the code 14:13:42 we finalzed reusing the neutron-classifier repo, right ??? 14:13:55 davidsha: initially will come from the spec 14:14:23 reedip_: finalized how? 14:15:10 igordcard : asking if the old neutron classifier repo which was earlier created would be used for CCF Model ? 14:15:11 I guess that we decided if we were just using neutron classifier 14:15:19 okk 14:17:02 reedip_: yes neutron-classifier repo + wiping it is the recommended option 14:17:19 igordcard : yeah thats what I was asking 14:17:44 reedip_: also fine by kevinbenton.. it won't be an actual wipe as anyone can go back in history and retrieve the original neutron-classifier 14:18:11 igordcard : ok, gr8 then :) 14:18:31 moving on.. 14:18:46 #topic PoC status 14:19:02 I haven't put my hands in the code yet :( 14:19:12 how's it going davidsha ? 14:19:46 same here I hoped to look a bit into it but that is still on my todo list :/ 14:20:32 So, I've addressed the comments left on the spec, and fleshed out all the resources. just working on the classification groups and then I'll move onto the unit tests and OpenStack client. 14:20:41 left on the PoC* 14:20:45 sorry 14:21:42 Are there any questions on the PoC? 14:23:07 the classification grouping, is it based on the v15 spec or the earlier ones? 14:23:24 Latest one 14:23:31 cool cool 14:24:46 you're the main ccf dev at the moment so feel free to roast the spec if something isn't really attainable or for any other reason 14:25:02 Sure! >:) 14:25:05 :) 14:26:24 while we have no access to the repo, I'd recommend squashing all pending changes in a single patch, I've had the experience in the past of dealing with 4+ dependent patches on gerrit and it's not easy to update/test/repeat 14:26:39 igordcard: ack. 14:27:52 davidsha: that mismatch with the semantic types (like tcp and udp being the same), is it resolved? 14:29:06 igordcard: Yup, took them straight down from the spec. 14:29:25 davidsha: cool cool 14:30:12 I don't have further questions now, I don't see any others, moving on... 14:30:24 #topic Open discussion 14:30:43 I should rename this topic to Coffee time 14:31:00 igordcard: It would be nice ;P 14:31:04 and you would send coffee to all attendees? 14:31:21 Were there many here at the Summit? 14:31:30 bcafarel: no, that's out of scope... you are expected to go grab some coffee :p 14:32:10 I only met thomas and pcarver 14:32:50 igordcard: Any updates from the summit that could affect work going forward? 14:34:33 davidsha: none that I noticed.. the closest is that yes the spec can be merged even we aren't working directly on neutron, and that later the project could become a stadium project 14:34:52 igordcard: ack 14:35:05 s/could/can 14:37:15 alright, this is all 14:37:31 thank you for attending and see you in the next meeting! 14:37:41 Thanks! 14:38:16 also hope to see you in Denver to discuss post-spec dev and goals 14:38:19 bye 14:38:27 cya 14:38:32 #endmeeting