17:00:07 #startmeeting network_common_flow_classifier 17:00:08 Meeting started Tue Sep 27 17:00:07 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is igordcard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'network_common_flow_classifier' 17:00:14 hi all 17:00:17 let's wait 2 minutes to improve the chances of everyone being around 17:00:31 hi 17:00:38 hi davidsha 17:00:56 hey igordcard 17:01:55 HI 17:02:09 hi ralonsoh 17:02:14 problems in freenode? 17:02:44 maybe it's not the best day for this... too many people down 17:03:00 There seems to be an excessive amount of people loosing connection 17:03:21 yes freenode has said christmas has come early and they arereceiving many packets 17:03:53 kk, thanks clarkb 17:04:10 yep looks like it, and I'm also having network connectivity issues, apologies if I stay silent for a few minutes 17:04:24 anyone else here for the classification framework + ovs flow management meeting? 17:04:36 *Raises hand 17:05:02 * igordcard raises hand as well ... 17:06:35 5 minutes now, I'll go through the topics anyway to keep them documented, and we can better discuss next meeting or at the summit 17:06:50 #info Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_27.2F9.2F2016 17:06:54 we'll start with the Common Classification / Common Classifier part of the meeting 17:06:59 #topic Can we converge on a first approach (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333993)? 17:07:15 we have 3 approaches documented - we should vote on a specific one so we can start development asap 17:07:24 any preferences towards a specific approach? 17:07:57 this is one of the questions that need to be answered and agreed 17:08:48 Approach 2 seemed good, I'll need to review the spec again though to make sure I understand it. 17:09:05 davidsha: yep people seemed to lean towards that approach, overall 17:09:53 igordcard: ack, Not sure if we can make a decision for this at the moment though with only those in attendance 17:10:12 no, no, I'm just documenting the topics for this meeting 17:10:42 moving on... 17:10:46 #topic Next steps on the common classifier 17:11:23 /msg NickServ identify openstack 17:11:29 next steps will be defined after we converge to an approach 17:12:28 kk, this is being developed outside of Neutron correct, it's going into neutron-classifier right? 17:12:42 davidsha: right, that's the next topic 17:12:45 moving on... 17:12:48 igordcard: ack 17:12:52 #topic Repo: new repo or neutron-classifier repo? 17:13:40 igordcard: my 2 cents is use neutron-classifier, it's already set up and is meant for this purpose. 17:13:57 overall, people seem to think it's a good idea to base the new common classification framework on the neutron-classifier, independently of which approach is chosen 17:14:16 davidsha: yep I would also vote for that 17:14:40 igordcard: As in use the repo or base the approach on the existing neutron-classifier code? 17:16:07 davidsha: at least the repo... but if part of the code is already well-aligned with what we will plan to do, then code may be reused as well, sure 17:16:23 igordcard: ack 17:16:48 we'll have to better figure out what to develop, and that depends on what approach gets chosen 17:16:57 moving on... 17:16:59 #topic Classification Framework: Barcelona Summit arrangements 17:17:30 so, for the record, I will be going the the barcelona summit 17:17:47 I'll be there as well. 17:17:49 we should meet-up there to accelerate the common classification framework 17:18:06 +1 17:18:50 I'm hoping that more people come to the next meeting so we can know who else is going and schedule some meetups 17:19:43 igordcard: there will be another meeting on the october 11 so we can grab more people on IRC 17:20:08 davidsha: +1 17:20:12 switching to the OVS Flow Management part of the meeting.. 17:20:21 moving on.. 17:20:23 #topic Status of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320439/ 17:20:45 there is good agreement on the current state of the OVS flow management spec 17:20:55 davidsha: would you like to take over this topic of the meeting? 17:21:12 igordcard: sure, there isn't much to add though. 17:21:36 The spec is almost merged and there seems to be an agreement on the approach 17:22:35 I'll resume the POC code I developed and aim to have it ready for Ocata-1 in November. Code reviews would be appreciated. 17:23:28 davidsha: alright, that's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323963/ right? 17:23:32 I'll need to sync with ajo as well to make sure there isn't any misunderstandings. 17:23:39 igordcard: yup 17:23:45 cool 17:24:42 alright 17:24:44 moving on.. 17:24:45 #topic OVS Flow Management: Barcelona Summit arrangements 17:25:11 same as what I said for the classification framework part 17:25:19 we'll defer this until the next meeting 17:25:25 moving on.. 17:25:28 #topic Open discussion 17:25:31 anything else you want to discuss? 17:25:39 I'm good, you? 17:25:44 davidsha: great! 17:25:54 thanks all! *cough* davidsha 17:26:09 I guess this is everything for now 17:26:11 Lol, thank igordcard! 17:26:17 cya 17:26:20 cya 17:26:24 #endmeeting