15:59:36 <xwizard_> #startmeeting Murano Bug Scrub
15:59:38 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 23 15:59:36 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is xwizard_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:59:39 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:59:41 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'murano_bug_scrub'
16:00:19 <xwizard_> #topic The list of bugs, which we want to discuss today:
16:00:19 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.tag=&f
16:00:19 <xwizard_> ield.tags_combinator=ANY&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on
16:00:35 <xwizard_> hm, ok
16:00:40 <xwizard_> Hi there!
16:00:55 <sergmelikyan> Hi :)
16:01:13 <xwizard_> I suggest to discuss all open/new bugs today
16:01:33 <xwizard_> we have 50 bugs without fixes
16:01:57 <katyafervent> Hi
16:02:08 <katyafervent> 50 ?!
16:02:23 <xwizard_> I will send the link to the bugs and after that we can discuss each of them
16:02:24 <katyafervent> all of them are assigned for 0.5?
16:02:26 <xwizard_> yes
16:02:30 <xwizard_> no
16:03:03 <sergmelikyan> I think we should concentrate on bugs assigned to 0.5
16:03:07 <xwizard_> I want to discuss all open bugs to verify that all open critical bugs are targeted to 0.5 release
16:03:51 <sergmelikyan> xwizard_, I think we should discuss only new bugs not assigned to the milestone
16:04:01 <xwizard_> ok
16:04:17 <sergmelikyan> bugs with priorities and confirmed status are already triaged, actually
16:04:30 <katyafervent> + 1
16:04:45 <xwizard_> so, first of all let's to discuss bugs for release 0.5 and after that all new bugs
16:05:23 <xwizard_> we can find all bugs, which should be fixed in 0.5 on this page: https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/0.5
16:06:00 <xwizard_> we have 5 bugs for release 0.5, which is not assigned to anybody
16:06:12 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311556
16:06:55 <xwizard_> tsufiev, what about this issue?
16:07:13 <openstackgerrit> A change was merged to stackforge/murano-api: Added ipAddresses property to Instance  https://review.openstack.org/89848
16:07:15 <katyafervent> this bug is hard to reproduce
16:07:15 <xwizard_> we worked on it today and looks like we know how to fix it
16:07:27 <sergmelikyan> invalid
16:07:37 <xwizard_> ok
16:07:43 <akuznetsova> I started deploy few times today, but didn't see this trace
16:07:50 <sjmc7> i've seen this one i think
16:07:53 <katyafervent> that's quick :)
16:07:55 <sjmc7> 'Returning exception ERROR: The Parameter (AWS::StackId) was not defined in template. to caller
16:07:55 <sjmc7> '
16:08:06 <akuznetsova> it's another
16:08:08 <sjmc7> ok
16:08:41 <sergmelikyan> sjmc7, this happens when you deploy env that creates heat stack, and stack with same name is already exist
16:08:46 <katyafervent> let's investigate more on that
16:08:52 <sjmc7> ok sergmelikyan, my bad
16:09:20 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311769
16:09:47 <akuznetsova> katyafervent: i think it connected with https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1308910
16:10:29 <xwizard_> it is not clear what the problem is
16:10:32 <katyafervent> I guess so. Need to check with this fix
16:11:04 <xwizard_> ok
16:11:07 <katyafervent> akuznetsova, please assign it to yourself and let's coninue
16:11:13 <katyafervent> *continue
16:11:19 <xwizard_> moved to Incomplete and we will recheck this bug
16:11:41 <akuznetsova> akuznetsova: ok, i will recheck it
16:11:56 <akuznetsova> katyafervent: ok, i will recheck it
16:12:32 <xwizard_> #action akuznetsova recheck https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311769
16:13:09 <xwizard_> ok
16:13:09 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1305548
16:13:42 <xwizard_> who want to fix it in 0.5? looks like it should be fixed
16:13:54 <sjmc7> xwizard_ - one of my team could take a stab at it
16:14:11 <xwizard_> sjmc7: cool
16:14:18 <sjmc7> i'll assign it to me for now
16:14:41 <katyafervent> may be just need to add a message that app catalog is empty and that's it ?
16:14:52 <xwizard_> #action sjmc7 will find who will fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1305548
16:15:08 <xwizard_> done
16:15:10 <sjmc7> yeah katyafervent, something like that
16:15:26 <openstackgerrit> Timur Sufiev proposed a change to stackforge/murano-api: Fix extracting services from deployment.description  https://review.openstack.org/89889
16:15:26 <katyafervent> ok, move on
16:15:37 <xwizard_> the next one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1310958
16:15:55 <sjmc7> Ryan just assigned that to himself xwizard_
16:16:11 <xwizard_> ok, cool
16:16:16 <katyafervent> do we really need this?
16:16:24 <akuznetsova> katyafervent: yes
16:16:24 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1310960
16:16:27 <sjmc7> it's a simple fix
16:16:30 <katyafervent> ok
16:16:36 <xwizard_> katyafervent: why not?
16:16:52 <sjmc7> xwizard_ - we can take that one too, seems relatively simple?
16:16:59 <xwizard_> yes
16:17:08 <xwizard_> ok
16:17:12 <sjmc7> assigned to me for now
16:17:29 <xwizard_> #action  https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1310960  assigned to sjmc7
16:17:45 <xwizard_> done
16:17:51 <katyafervent> I'm thinking how it will be looked with 100 tags and what is better with comma or without:)
16:18:25 <xwizard_> so we can create more user friendly variants for tags
16:18:36 <akuznetsova> because we can have tags with spaces
16:19:10 <xwizard_> we can display some 'circle' for each tag
16:19:23 <akuznetsova> and it is not clear where one tag ends and another starts
16:19:34 <xwizard_> and show dofferent tags with different circles
16:19:53 <xwizard_> so, let's to discuss it in comments for bug
16:20:01 <katyafervent> ok, let's use comma for a separation
16:20:07 <xwizard_> it is all for 0.5
16:20:24 <xwizard_> we can move on and discuss all 'new' bugs
16:20:36 <tsufiev_> missed the beginning
16:20:59 <tsufiev_> and xchat didn't pinged me :(
16:21:04 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311534
16:21:12 <xwizard_> tsufiev_: no problem
16:21:41 <akuznetsova> tsufiev_: we discussed few 'new' bugs assigned to 0.5
16:21:45 <tsufiev_> xwizard_, ok
16:21:53 <tsufiev_> the last bug is a problem for UI
16:22:18 <xwizard_> yes
16:22:29 <xwizard_> bot it is not clear for me how to fix it
16:22:38 <tsufiev_> not only does it apply to last component operation, but also to component logs - all these items are fetched using entity_id's
16:22:40 <xwizard_> *but
16:22:41 <tsufiev_> for me too
16:23:27 <katyafervent> let's assign it to gokrokv__
16:23:42 <katyafervent> since Stan is on vacation
16:23:57 <tsufiev_> i'd suggest sergmelikyan to fix that bug
16:24:18 <tsufiev_> sergmelikyan, https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311534
16:24:26 <xwizard_> katyafervent: I think it will be surprise for Georgy
16:24:26 <katyafervent> gokrokv__, had to deal with the statistics
16:24:57 <xwizard_> #action https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311534  assigned to sergmelikyan
16:25:02 <sergmelikyan> Ok
16:26:01 <katyafervent> what's next
16:26:09 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1301181
16:27:30 <xwizard_> so, I belive that we should fix all bugs with server response with 500 status code
16:27:32 <sjmc7> was this one reproducable from API calls? or through the dashboard?
16:27:41 <xwizard_> but probably not in 0.5
16:27:50 <xwizard_> it is from API calls
16:27:54 <akuznetsova> this is old bug
16:28:38 <sjmc7> i can try to take a look at it but possibly not today
16:28:57 <xwizard_> sjmc7, cool
16:29:34 <xwizard_> this bug was assigned to you
16:29:42 <xwizard_> the next one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311084
16:30:20 <xwizard_> tsufiev_: can you please explain what the problem is and how we can fix it?
16:30:39 <tsufiev_> xwizard_, sure
16:30:45 <xwizard_> looks like we can move this bug to next releases?
16:31:09 <tsufiev_> gettext extracts strings marked in existing sources
16:31:40 <tsufiev_> but because all strings processed by dynamic UI are coming not from the sources, those strings are not extracted
16:31:52 <tsufiev_> *coming from other sources
16:32:22 <xwizard_> ok, looks like we can fix it in the future, not in 0.5
16:32:38 <tsufiev_> yes, l10n is still not an issue
16:33:17 <xwizard_> ok, the next one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311769
16:33:31 <xwizard_> ou, we already discussed this issue
16:33:56 <xwizard_> the next one https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1280173
16:36:12 <katyafervent> let's assign it to dteselkin
16:36:13 <xwizard_> dteselkin, can you please proviade some estimated for this issue?
16:36:36 <xwizard_> yes, it is assigned to Dmitry, but do we plan to fix it in 0.5?
16:37:07 <xwizard_> ok, this bug moved to release 0.5
16:37:23 <xwizard_> I belive that Dmitry will find the time to fix it
16:37:42 <xwizard_> the next one https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1285099
16:37:59 <ruhe> xwizard_: this bug needs more information https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1280173
16:38:25 <akuznetsova> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1285099 - invalid
16:38:25 <xwizard_> ruhe: ok, I will change status to Incomplete
16:38:36 <xwizard_> akuznetsova, ok
16:38:44 <katyafervent> why invalid/
16:39:15 <akuznetsova> katyafervent: cause we don't have this wizard yet
16:39:27 <xwizard_> the next one https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1286085
16:39:37 <xwizard_> this issue for release 0.6
16:39:57 <xwizard_> status was changed from New to Confirmed
16:40:15 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1287143
16:40:27 <ruhe> xwizard_: there is no 0.6
16:40:41 <katyafervent> actually we do, just remove metadata from images and you'll see this
16:40:45 <ruhe> xwizard_: there is series juno and milestone juno-1
16:40:49 <xwizard_> for https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1286085 I can see mailstone 0.6
16:41:01 <katyafervent> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1285099 is not invalid
16:41:05 <akuznetsova> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1287143 - invalid
16:41:19 <ruhe> xwizard_: damn, i'll walk through all bugs/BPs assigned to 0.6 and re-schedule them for juno-1
16:41:24 <xwizard_> katyafervent: why https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1285099 is not invalid  ?\
16:41:46 <akuznetsova> katyafervent: where do we see this message now?
16:42:21 <xwizard_> akuznetsova: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1287143 marked as invalid
16:42:27 <katyafervent> oh, I remembered) Ok
16:42:58 <akuznetsova> xwizard_: can you please assign this https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1285099 to me? i want to check it again
16:43:10 <xwizard_> akuznetsova: ok
16:43:26 <xwizard_> katyafervent what about  https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1285099 ?
16:43:34 <katyafervent> invalid
16:43:45 <xwizard_> ok
16:44:34 <xwizard_> the next one https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1295573
16:45:15 <katyafervent> everything is ok with it
16:45:21 <xwizard_> Looks like it is not bug
16:45:45 <katyafervent> let smelikyan investigate it
16:45:48 <xwizard_> so, is it invalid?
16:46:20 <xwizard_> ok
16:46:41 <xwizard_> #action smelikyan to investigate the https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1295573
16:47:32 <xwizard_> ok
16:47:32 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1306579
16:48:08 <xwizard_> akuznetsova: can you please describe this bug?
16:48:22 <xwizard_> is it critical for 0.5?
16:48:37 <akuznetsova> xwizard_: look at screenshot
16:49:18 <xwizard_> akuznetsova: ok :)
16:49:24 <xwizard_> need to fix it in 0.5
16:49:25 <akuznetsova> xwizard_: this is not critical, but i think we have to fix it
16:49:41 <xwizard_> it is really strange, we should fix it
16:49:57 <xwizard_> looks like out form displayed incorrectly (with exceptions)
16:50:28 <xwizard_> who want to fix it?
16:50:40 <xwizard_> katyafervent: can you take this?
16:51:06 <katyafervent> I could try
16:51:18 <xwizard_> katyafervent: assigned to you
16:51:38 <xwizard_> and assigned to 0.5 release
16:51:45 <tsufiev_> how many bugs left?
16:51:53 <xwizard_> 4
16:51:59 <xwizard_> the next one https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1310536
16:52:32 <xwizard_> katyafervent: should we fix it in 0.5?
16:52:38 <katyafervent> yes
16:53:03 <xwizard_> ok, who can do this?
16:53:06 <katyafervent> let's assign it to ativelkov_away for now
16:53:24 <katyafervent> may be I'll reassign it later
16:53:31 <xwizard_> so, we plan to release 0.5 when ativalkov will on PTO
16:53:54 <xwizard_> o, sorry.
16:54:04 <xwizard_> ok, will be assigned to ativelkov
16:54:51 <xwizard_> so, the las 3 bugs for today's meeting
16:55:01 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311085
16:55:30 <akuznetsova> this is duplicate
16:55:36 <xwizard_> is it duplicated with other bugs?
16:55:46 <sjmc7> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1310960
16:55:51 <xwizard_> akuznetsova: can you please find the link to the duplicate?
16:55:54 <xwizard_> cool
16:56:49 <xwizard_> marked as duplicated
16:57:35 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311521
16:58:00 <xwizard_> katyafervent: can we assign this bug to you or Dmitry?
16:58:36 <katyafervent> no)
16:58:42 <xwizard_> hm
16:58:42 <tsufiev_> xwizard_, assign it to me
16:58:46 <katyafervent> Timur or me will fix it
16:58:49 <xwizard_> ok
16:59:25 <xwizard_> and the last
16:59:30 <xwizard_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311755
17:00:00 <sjmc7> this was me earlier
17:00:06 <xwizard_> sjmc7: do you have any ideas how we can fix it?
17:00:22 <xwizard_> or it is already fixed?
17:00:35 <katyafervent> Or in progress
17:00:38 <sjmc7> either the engine needs to update the database or send an rpc message
17:00:53 <sjmc7> i'm not working on it; it'll take me a while to get familiar with that code
17:00:56 <xwizard_> so, looks like this hard bug and we can assign it to ativelkov
17:00:57 <katyafervent> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89866/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89727/
17:01:45 <xwizard_> ok, I will assign this bug to me and will verify it
17:02:16 * tsufiev_ went away
17:02:23 <xwizard_> ok
17:02:34 <xwizard_> thank you for this meeting!
17:02:44 <tsufiev_> np)
17:03:09 <xwizard_> #endmeeting