17:01:05 <felipemonteiro> #startmeeting murano
17:01:06 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 30 17:01:05 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is felipemonteiro. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:01:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:01:09 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'murano'
17:01:12 <pbourke> o/
17:01:13 <felipemonteiro> #topic Roll Call
17:01:28 <felipemonteiro> Hi pbourke
17:01:45 <pbourke> hey felipemonteiro
17:01:51 <felipemonteiro> I created the patch for updating murano meeting time here:
17:01:53 <felipemonteiro> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468182/
17:02:09 <learnmore_> Hi
17:02:15 <learnmore_> o/
17:02:34 <felipemonteiro> hi learnmore_
17:02:51 <learnmore_> hi felipemonteiro
17:04:15 <pbourke> thanks a lot for that felipemonteiro
17:04:25 <felipemonteiro> #topic murano meeting time
17:04:53 <pbourke> so both current suggested times would work for, but I'll wait for some people in the US chip in
17:04:55 <pbourke> *for me
17:05:01 <learnmore_> So the proposed meeting time is 8am for the east coast
17:05:09 <felipemonteiro> np, though the time of 1 hour before the current time might not be feasible for people in asia time zones
17:05:45 <felipemonteiro> i'm hoping to get more feedback from kzaitsev (who lives in russia i believe) and anyone else who wants a different time for the meeting
17:07:04 <felipemonteiro> learnmore_: i take it you guys are east coast? i was kind of worried about 8am est being too early for central/pacific time folks
17:07:54 <learnmore_> Yes.  A few of us (Devjani, myself, and Gerry) are on the east coast.
17:08:09 <pbourke> maybe an hour or so later would be better for the east coast folk?
17:08:24 <pbourke> that should still be good for russia and europe
17:08:32 <learnmore_> Felipemonteiro you are on east coast too, yes?
17:08:39 <felipemonteiro> learnmore_: yes
17:08:49 <pbourke> asia would be a little late but not unreasonable and at least outside commute time
17:09:04 <felipemonteiro> i wouldn't mind 9 am, which would be 9 pm zhurong's time which isn't too bad
17:09:19 <felipemonteiro> pbourke: ++
17:12:30 <pbourke> felipemonteiro: how long would you like to wait before deciding?
17:13:17 <felipemonteiro> until friday. enough time until the next meeting for others to weigh in but not too late as to cause meeting time confusion.
17:13:21 <felipemonteiro> anything else on meeting times?
17:13:29 <pbourke> sounds good to me
17:14:02 <felipemonteiro> #topic Open Discussion
17:16:44 <felipemonteiro> pbourke: read your email you sent out to devstack mailing list, i think the approach to using murano attributes is good, because it's the simpler approach, and right now contributors are limited
17:17:37 <felipemonteiro> you can wait a bit longer to see if anyone chimes in or otherwise release a spec to murano-specs repo with your proposed solution -- at least then it won't get lost in the memory hole of the mailing list
17:18:19 <pbourke> felipemonteiro: sure thing, I'll do up a spec tomorrow
17:18:49 <pbourke> felipemonteiro: I've actually shifted a little to encrypting the full object model in the database, I feel its safer and less burden on the user to have it happen transparently
17:19:12 <learnmore_> felipemonteiro:  we would like to get this approved for Pike.  Is this possible?
17:20:36 <learnmore_> felipemonteiro:  Could you change the approver of the blueprint,  Allow encrypting selected muranopl properties , from Serg to yourself?
17:20:50 <felipemonteiro> yes, there's still ample time during pike, although it might only get done by p-3
17:20:57 <felipemonteiro> sure
17:21:19 <learnmore_> thanks.
17:21:49 <pbourke> felipemonteiro: if you happen to see serg or kirill in the channel during the week perhaps you could point them towards the spec (once its available)
17:22:35 <felipemonteiro> pbourke: will do. i updated the bp with everything you need.
17:22:43 <pbourke> felipemonteiro: great, thanks!
17:24:32 <felipemonteiro> pbourke: i also forgot to mention that the final time we decide for the meeting is obviously contingent upon availability, but i'll try to make it work
17:25:01 <pbourke> felipemonteiro: no problem
17:25:55 <pbourke> felipemonteiro: that's all from me, is there anything else you'd like to discuss or things I can help with in general?
17:27:10 <felipemonteiro> pbourke: no, i'm working on pushing policy into code, which is straightforward enough. i would mention code reviews, but not much to review these days.
17:27:50 <pbourke> sure, I'll try take a look at the policy stuff when I get a chance
17:28:08 <pbourke> ok I'm going to run, ttyl
17:28:38 <felipemonteiro> pbourke: np, ttyl
17:28:48 <felipemonteiro> anyone else have anything pressing for discussion?
17:29:05 <felipemonteiro> otherwise will end earlier
17:31:24 <felipemonteiro> thanks all who attended
17:31:25 <felipemonteiro> #endmeeting