17:00:37 #startmeeting murano 17:00:37 Meeting started Tue May 24 17:00:37 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kzaitsev_mb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:40 The meeting name has been set to 'murano' 17:00:57 #topic rollcall 17:01:03 o/ 17:01:06 o/ 17:01:14 \o/ 17:01:16 o/ 17:01:20 let's see who's here today for the meeting =) 17:01:25 o/ 17:01:27 o/ 17:01:35 0/ 17:02:04 o/ 17:03:10 o/ 17:04:05 #topic Action Item Review 17:04:20 we had a couple of AI related to convergence 17:04:58 1) I was to register a BP for any future work related to convergence 17:05:01 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/murano-heat-convergence 17:05:29 and Nikolay_St was to check current status 17:05:52 hm, seems that he's not here today. Well, I'll fill in on the topic then for the record. 17:07:15 Murano does work ok with heat-convergence enabled, all the apps are deployed/deleted just fine. However heat folks warned us from enabling it by default on our CI as the feature is not yet stable on the heat side 17:07:58 therefore we decided to get back to it at n-1 and then n-2 milestones and see if it's ready and enable it then 17:08:16 Nikolay_St: I've just filled everybody in on the convergence stuff ) 17:08:52 kzaitsev_mb: thx. has problem with my internet connection :( 17:09:04 no problem =) 17:09:58 3d AI was on me — to create a backport review session, like we agreed to have one every 2 weeks, but the summit disrupted the schedule =) We have 1 for today. 17:10:15 so on to our agenda for today 17:10:17 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda 17:10:58 We've already given status update on heat convergence, so I'll skip that part =) 17:11:06 #topic Newton CPL volunteers 17:11:37 if anyone is not familiar with the concept — here's a link 17:11:40 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons 17:12:37 So I've been working through the emails and one of them suggested that it's time to update the CPL page. 17:14:58 Some of the CPL positions right now are assigned to me (I've also replaced katyafervent's position and Serg's with myself) but I obviously won't have time to tend all those cross-project activities 17:15:56 So if anyone is interested in volounteering — the list is: i18n, oslo, cross-project specs, documentation 17:16:14 kzaitsev_mb: I can try cross-project specs 17:17:00 Nikolay_St: great (I actually think I've removed that from you and wanted to ask you if you're still interested in being that sort of a CPL) 17:17:07 Nikolay_St: so obviously you are =) 17:17:45 kzaitsev_mb: so, also I'm not sure that log working group is still alive 17:17:52 will check it tomorrow 17:17:59 Could you please update the wiki respectively? =) 17:18:49 sure 17:18:56 give me a minute =) 17:19:13 we still have oslo, i18n and docs. =) There's no real hurry in that, but I would be happy to share some of the cross-project communications. 17:21:05 oshykhkerimov, vakovalchuk, tlashchova_, zhurong: If anyone of you is interested — those are actually pretty interesting and rewarding activities. 17:21:14 I can try with oslo f.e. if smb helps me to start 17:22:02 I'll think about it for sure 17:22:44 sorry) 17:23:05 like I said — there's no real hurry, feel free to ping me if you'll make you mind — I'll be able to help you around/introduce to some meetings/etc =) 17:23:58 oshykhkerimov: cool — feel free to edit the wiki and add yourself as an oslo CPL. Ping me sometime afterwards if anything is uncertain to you =) 17:24:01 Also 17:24:30 i18n looks interesting but the liason for this project should be a core reviewer 17:25:00 I think I can try something of these after becoming comfortable with bug supervision 17:25:20 tlashchova_: well, I think we can make an exception =) 17:26:09 kzaitsev_mb: We also have VMT CPL role vacant.. 17:27:22 tlashchova_: I'm +1 on delegating i18n CPL to you, so unless there are any objections — let's put you into that position and see how it works out 17:28:14 freerunner: vulnerability management — true. 17:28:31 well, I think I'll reseve that one for myself for now 17:29:13 unless there is a volounteer — whereas I suggest we would put both of us there and work together on that 17:29:54 Also. We've put freerunner as a Infra and QA CPL — he has been fulfilling those roles anyways =) 17:30:38 tlashchova_: seems like no objections — so could you please update the wiki and but your name in the i18n liaison? =) 17:31:00 kzaitsev_mb: sure 17:32:05 kzaitsev_mb: So, we also should create murano-coresec team (if we still not have it) in launchpad 17:32:36 #info New CPLs for newton cycle: Nikolay_St: cross-project specs; freerunner: QA & Infra; oshykhkerimov: oslo; tlashchova_:i18n; 17:32:56 #action update the wiki to mention new CPLs 17:33:33 freerunner: well, I think you're right, but that seems to be a bit outside the discussion and I have to admit — I'm not entirelly confident in the topic 17:34:04 Let's mone this discussion to the next IRC meeting and go all the preps needed? 17:35:10 ok, went better than expected. =) 17:35:32 #topic Review bugs to backport to stable/mitaka 17:35:56 I've put together an etherpad with potential bugs, that can be backported to s/mitaka 17:36:03 oh, the best part 17:36:08 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/murano-stable-backports 17:36:27 it's a bit big, since we hadn't backported much since 2.0.0 =) 17:37:40 I'll give you guys some time to read/look through it =) 17:39:57 Most of the bugs marked as unapplicable are docs/unit-tests/new-features(wishlist-bugs) 17:42:33 to put this list together I've used awesome tools by ihrachys, available on release-tools repository 17:42:42 worked like a charm ) 17:43:26 Smth like './bugs-fixed-since.py --repo ../../murano/murano --start 2.0.0 | ./lp-filter-bugs-by-importance.py murano | ./lp-filter-bugs-by-tag.py murano in-stable-mitaka | ./annotate-lp-bugs.py murano' 17:43:39 kzaitsev_mb: looks good for me 17:44:08 great job finding it 17:45:21 this is a great tools 17:46:07 Nikolay_St: I think I'll wait a day or two for any feedback about the bugs in the etherpad. If there would be none — I'm going to backport all of those to stable/mitaka, maybe would ask vakovalchuk to help me a bit =) 17:46:42 of course 17:48:07 ok, done with this topic then. =) 17:48:13 #topic Open Discussion 17:49:02 does anyone have anything to share =) 17:49:42 hm 17:50:21 I want to put this up to everyoune: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/yaql-sphinx-extension 17:50:46 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/yaql-sphinx-extension 17:51:54 any thoughts? StanLagun ativelkov ^^ 17:52:59 I'm okay with the first part of the etherpad but have several issues with the second one 17:58:04 I think you would be able to ping Stan on his opinion after this meeting. 17:58:48 We're almost out of time, so if anyone has anything else — feel free to come to #murano 17:58:57 #endmeeting