17:00:31 #startmeeting Murano 17:00:35 Meeting started Tue Nov 25 17:00:31 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is serg_melikyan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'murano' 17:00:45 hi! 17:00:49 Hi! 17:01:20 o/ 17:01:26 anyone else from Murano team? :) 17:02:01 Let's start folks 17:02:39 Our agenda today is a little bit short, looks like we don't have questions to discuss today except our Action Items Review 17:03:01 Any last minute agenda changes? 17:03:52 #topic Action Items Review 17:03:56 ee can discuss templete specs 17:04:11 *we 17:04:13 katyafervent2: templete specs? 17:04:45 templete for the specification 17:05:55 Ok 17:06:11 StanLagun: first action item is on you 17:06:20 stan_lagun will insure that tickets about issues with re-deployment will be created 17:06:35 https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1394104 17:06:37 Launchpad bug 1394104 in murano "Redeploy of failed environment is not possible" [High,In progress] 17:06:44 Hi 17:07:00 Kate filled it and I think there is some progress on it already 17:07:27 This is only thing missing to have proper redeployment? 17:08:13 AFAIK yes. But we will examine it once again once this bug is fixed 17:08:20 I see that katyafervent2 already proposed fix for that issue :) 17:08:36 yes, dashboard was the reason 17:08:45 StanLagun, katyafervent2 thank you! 17:08:45 and fix is already on review 17:09:28 #action StanLagun, re-examine re-deployment feature after #1394104 will be merged 17:11:18 Second Action Items is also on StanLagun: stan_lagun, will create etherpad with list of changes planned in DSL for K 17:12:02 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MuranoPL-Kilo 17:12:31 is it onky for muranoPL? 17:13:02 this first part is strictly MuranoPL 17:13:10 the second is related to MuranoPL 17:14:43 I think we also need to think about refactoring core library (essentially second part of the etherpad) 17:15:36 StanLagun: what do you think? 17:15:36 agree, this also need to be done 17:16:04 but thats another set of blueprints that nobody designed yet 17:16:26 those in my list were already present in launchpad 17:16:34 (in second part) 17:17:24 Thank you :) 17:17:47 #3 stan_lagun will move his document about versioning to the spec repo 17:18:54 haven't done this yet. BTW we didn't merged initial commit yet 17:19:30 #action serg_melikyan, review and merge initial commit with template to the murano-specs 17:20:12 StanLagun: you are right :( But you can start moving versioning spec despite fact that initial template is not yet merged 17:21:12 I know. It was very busy week. Sorry 17:22:49 #4 Serg, discuss policy guided fulfillment and create all necessary BP 17:23:15 hi 17:23:31 My fault, had no time to do that :( 17:24:08 #action serg_melikyan, discuss policy guided fulfillment and create all necessary BP 17:24:58 #5 serg_melikyan, fill all missing BP in Roadmap 17:25:21 again, this was really busy week ( Missed that too 17:25:43 Hi 17:25:59 Hi, henarmunoz! 17:26:08 Hi Henar! 17:26:52 #topic Open Discussion 17:27:11 We have more than 30 minutes for open discsussion 17:29:42 I would like to ask about the template for BP (as an action item) - so all BP for Murano shall use it - is it correct? 17:30:18 Not exactly - this template for specifications, not a for BP 17:30:25 ok 17:30:34 BP may be created in launchpad.net/murano 17:30:45 but eventually all BPs should get their specs 17:30:57 I saw that some specification just points to launchpad or etherpad - is it ok? 17:30:58 correct 17:31:00 ok :-) 17:31:25 We are moving all specification from etherpads to the murano-specs 17:31:33 I think it will point to githun 17:31:39 *github 17:31:47 ok, thanks 17:33:25 I'd also like to ask everyone to review existing commits as we have some that are hanging in review for months 17:34:08 btw if you are mentioning reviews & commits - who are the reviewers for Murano? 17:34:12 And there are some major ones like Keystone trusts or Nova network support that need careful review 17:34:28 anyone can review 17:35:03 there are core reviewers group that has permissions to merge (say +2) commits 17:35:15 others can say +1 or -1 17:35:15 You just need to register, and you can review any patches 17:35:52 ok. thanks 17:46:10 Ok, if no questions let's finish early :) 17:46:20 #endmeeting