15:00:38 #startmeeting monasca 15:00:38 Meeting started Wed Aug 1 15:00:38 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is witek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:40 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:42 The meeting name has been set to 'monasca' 15:00:59 hello everyone\ 15:01:40 anyone here today? 15:02:44 hello good morning 15:03:03 hi 15:03:51 witek: hi 15:04:09 due to Freenode servers abuse I have requested +r flag for #openstack-monasca 15:04:21 and #openstack-meeting-3 15:04:47 it requires that the username is registered 15:05:03 I hope I haven't block too many that way 15:05:15 ah i see thats good 15:07:37 some folks have problems logging in 15:09:49 akhil_jain: can we start with the webhook plugin? 15:10:09 yes sure 15:10:23 #topic authenticated webhook 15:10:29 here is the change: 15:10:47 https://review.openstack.org/584303 15:11:56 akhil_jain: you had an idea of enabling 'auth_required' option in config 15:12:06 any more thoughts on it? 15:12:43 that was more of question to you, if that is valid approach 15:13:20 the way you have told might make code redundant. not sure 15:13:58 the disadvantage of setting it in config file is that it would apply to all webhook notifications configured in system 15:15:27 on the other hand, services not needing authentication would just ignore the header 15:15:29 yes got your point, then making diffent webhook_notifier is required 15:16:57 I think in the first version it would be enough to set it in the config file 15:17:10 any opinions from others? 15:17:19 dougsz_: ? 15:17:32 sorry - haven't had the bandwidth to review it yet 15:19:16 the question is if it's OK to require authentication for all configured webhook notifications? 15:19:42 or do we need a mechanism to disable/enable it for individual ones 15:20:02 the way it's proposed now, would allow to enable/disable for all 15:20:31 the credentials are stored in config file 15:21:04 token added as request header 15:22:27 I'd say let's go with the simple version 15:22:33 need to look at what's proposed - where is the authentication taking place? 15:22:47 simple sounds good - that is either on or off for everything? 15:22:56 dougsz_: yes 15:23:12 I agree that adding token to all webhook requests might be OK for first version, it can be improved later 15:24:00 agreed 15:24:23 akhil_jain: did you have time to think about supporting Keystone Trusts? 15:24:53 not yet. but i have it on my list. will let you know soon enough about it 15:25:03 sure, thanks 15:25:46 #topic Rocky release 15:26:02 next week is the deadline for creating stable branches 15:26:36 please point to any bugs that need fixing 15:26:54 and bugfixes that need merging 15:27:26 Here's one I found in Monasca API: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587503/ 15:27:55 Thanks for fixing the issue with the 'future' lib witek 15:28:10 thanks dougsz_ for finding this 15:29:05 it also seems that I merged the log-api oslo change to quickly 15:29:31 log-agent doesn't not work in devstack plugin 15:29:50 didn't have time to look into it though 15:31:30 hmm. I'm currently deploying the master branches with Kolla on python 2.7 so I should hopefully be able to verify everything works for that use case by next week. 15:31:59 monasca-log-api as well? 15:32:00 I think the oslo config might need patching up in monasca-notification - will submit a fix next week. 15:32:13 yeah - the log-api seems to be working for me so far on master 15:32:34 ok 15:32:55 #topic organisational 15:33:09 next week is my last one before 3 weeks vacation 15:33:28 someone else will have to organize the meetings in that time 15:33:41 look for a volunteer 15:34:19 I am away the last week in August, but I could do the earlier ones 15:34:29 dougsz_: thanks 15:34:45 also, don't forget to think about topics for the PTG 15:35:00 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-ptg-stein 15:35:35 ah yes, thanks for reminding. I am going to add a topic for monasca transform updates 15:36:26 any other topics for today? 15:37:06 not much from me 15:37:16 guilhermesp already updated the status of monasca role work in osa 15:37:19 I'm deep in to refreshing devstack for monasca-ceilometer 15:37:21 can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567441/ when you get a chance? 15:37:31 kaiokmo: thanks 15:38:04 aagate: that one has been around for a long time 15:38:47 aagate: will try 15:39:44 anyone else would find time to look at transformer as well? 15:39:52 witek: thanks! yes wanted someone to review. Then I can request jodavis to +2 it ( we are close to deadline next week) 15:40:16 aagate: ok 15:40:24 witek: I *might* we need to deploy transform next week. 15:41:17 dougsz_: which release are you deploying? 15:41:30 pandy wanted to talk about the problems with his deployment 15:42:09 joadavis_: Is there one you recommend? I will try master otherwise. 15:42:52 (all other services are master) 15:44:04 master should be fine. I just wanted to check you weren't on an old release. :) 15:44:29 pandy apparently has problems joining this channel 15:45:05 do you have something more or should we move to #openstack-monasca? 15:45:27 joadavis_: ok, thanks! 15:46:37 I'd suggest to finish the meeting now and continue in #openstack-monasca 15:47:08 ok, thanks 15:47:20 #endmeeting