15:00:31 <witek> #startmeeting monasca
15:00:32 <openstack> Meeting started Wed May  9 15:00:31 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is witek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:33 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:36 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
15:00:47 <sc> yo
15:00:48 <witek> Hello everyone
15:00:54 <joadavis> greetings
15:00:55 <haruki> hello
15:01:10 <dougsz> hey all
15:01:16 <witek> few items in the agenda today
15:01:21 <witek> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
15:01:44 <witek> let's start
15:01:49 <witek> #topic documentation
15:02:29 <witek> i have started writing up the overview for the main monasca-api doc page
15:02:38 <witek> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/%22Story:+2001912%22
15:02:49 <sc> that a great job
15:02:55 <witek> with references to individual components
15:03:53 <witek> we would like to show it during the onboarding session for potential contributors in Vancouver
15:04:28 <sc> that means I have to update monasca-agent as promised some weeks ago
15:05:18 <witek> any documentation contributions are very welcome :)
15:06:11 <witek> there is still not much content, but I guess is good for a start
15:06:37 <sc> we have 13 days before the session, IIRC
15:06:49 <witek> I have also made a short review of our README files
15:07:02 <witek> and created tasks for reviewing and updating them
15:07:08 <witek> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2001980
15:07:22 <witek> some minor changes done myself already
15:07:41 <witek> if you would like to help, feel free to pick up a task
15:08:23 <witek> left some short notes on tasks, you can see them after unfolding the task
15:09:18 <witek> also, there is another review related to documenation
15:09:29 <witek> https://review.openstack.org/566722
15:10:09 <witek> it enables jobs for building docs in monasca-agent, monasca-trasform and some others
15:10:18 <witek> kaiokmo: are you here?
15:10:38 <haruki> great to updating README. I also would like to update or review if I can.
15:11:13 <witek> haruki: great, thanks
15:11:45 <witek> just assign the task to yourself and you can go ahead
15:12:24 <witek> I have talked to kaiokmo who has proposed the infra changed
15:12:36 <sc> monasca-agent changes needs to be documented, should I add a task to this story?
15:13:00 <dougsz> I'll see if I can pick anything up - probably won't be for a a couple of weeks.
15:14:08 <witek> sc: should probably be the same story as implementation
15:14:33 <witek> dougsz: busy with Kolla?
15:14:45 <dougsz> witek: Other things unfortunately
15:15:00 <dougsz> kolla is on pause, but hopefully I can resume soon
15:15:03 <witek> dougsz: btw, thanks for the reviews
15:15:25 <dougsz> np - mostly nit picking!
15:15:44 <witek> to get back to infra changes, kaiokmo offered help on migrating existing documentation to rst files
15:17:48 <witek> as the first step he sets up the zuul jobs and then will provide the required project structures
15:18:26 <witek> thanks for help kaiokmo
15:18:26 <witek> !
15:19:31 <joadavis> I'll make sure we get monasca-transform docs in shape. We've made some improvement recently, but our README.md is still in md
15:20:27 <witek> joadavis: thanks for updating the transformer docs
15:20:54 <witek> conversion will be a longer process I guess
15:21:51 <witek> anything else on docs?
15:22:41 <witek> #topic forum session
15:23:34 <sc> I going to be your voice with users, gimme suggestion what to present to start discussion
15:24:27 <witek> I would suggest to create an etherpad and collect a couple of topics
15:24:40 <sc> good
15:25:10 <sc> doing
15:25:13 <witek> and add the link to the etherpad to the schedule entry
15:25:19 <kaiokmo> sorry, I was unable to join earlier.
15:25:54 <sc> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-forum-vancouver-topics
15:26:04 <sc> please help in filling this up
15:27:21 <witek> why do you use/don't use Monasca?
15:27:42 <witek> which features are you missing?
15:28:02 <joadavis> How do you (or would you) use the data from Monasca?
15:28:03 <witek> how do you deploy, would you like to deploy?
15:28:47 <cbellucci> what tools do you currently use?
15:31:30 <sc> how do you provide your users with data to monitor their own cloud usage?
15:32:48 <cbellucci> on which feature would you like to work?
15:32:51 <sc> question for all of you, not for the forum: do you think it should be worth to have a devstack to show something running?
15:33:59 <cbellucci> good idea. people may not know Monasca well
15:34:42 <sc> OK
15:34:55 <witek> I'm not sure if that will help much
15:36:01 <joadavis> it is nice to have something to reference and show answers.  How long is the forum? You might not want to spend too much time showing an instance
15:36:11 <witek> 40 mins
15:36:47 <sc> 40 minutes, we have 7 points
15:37:18 <sc> I just what to start the discussion and then I'll see how it is going on
15:37:43 <witek> yes, please add your ideas in the next days, we can review the the etherpad next Wednesday
15:38:37 <witek> I mean, everyone who has idea
15:38:39 <witek> I mean, everyone who has ideas
15:39:42 <sc> good
15:39:58 <witek> thanks sc
15:40:31 <witek> kaiokmo: do you want to add anything to documentation topic?
15:41:45 <witek> if not, let's move on
15:41:49 <witek> #topic reviews
15:42:14 <witek> the list is quite long
15:42:28 <witek> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+projects:openstack/monasca
15:44:35 <witek> sc: is it your agenda item?
15:44:50 <joadavis> I see a few of the "update links in README" reviews are hanging around. Did we decide if we want all or none of them?
15:45:03 <sc> yes
15:45:19 <sc> but I got in a call
15:45:50 <witek> joadavis: I don't care much about these, really
15:47:01 <witek> any suggestions, how to improve our reviews?
15:47:03 <sc> I was just try to understand why we have so many not merged patch sets around
15:47:04 <joadavis> Neither do I. :) I think a few have gone in and a few were rejected. So we could go either way and just get them off th elist
15:47:43 <sc> some of them are all and rebasing is going to be a nightmare (the same I'm having with snmp notification)
15:48:07 <sc> I offloaded the call to my boss
15:49:40 <witek> some were blocked, some not maintained by the owner, but in most cases probably just missing reviews
15:51:54 <sc> do you think it's worth spending some time in analysing them and next wednesday I can come with a list of reviews we can work on?
15:52:58 <witek> we could create an etherpad for prioritizing change requests
15:53:22 <witek> or set a board in storyboard for this
15:53:51 <sc> I prefer filtering before on etherpad
15:54:23 <sc> then add to storyboard just think worth working and abandon everything else
15:54:54 <dougsz> Certainly we can abandon this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450868/ and i'll open a new one when I get to it.
15:56:42 <witek> so, let's start with the etherpad
15:57:46 <witek> the main goal should be to have a list of changes needing review
15:58:27 <sc> yes, this is my idea there is no point in leaving thinks there forever
15:59:27 <witek> more important for me is to point to the reviews which are important
16:00:25 <witek> time is over, I have to wrap up
16:00:34 <witek> thank you everyone
16:00:38 <sc> see you
16:00:41 <koji> sc: about snmp notification, if you don't have so much time, could you post the current code as WIP?
16:00:43 <witek> please fill in the forum etherpad
16:00:54 <koji> i'll try to rebase it
16:01:15 <witek> bye bys, see you next week
16:01:21 <witek> #endmeeting