14:00:23 #startmeeting monasca 14:00:25 Meeting started Wed Oct 11 14:00:23 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is witek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:29 The meeting name has been set to 'monasca' 14:00:58 Hello everyone 14:01:02 yo 14:01:12 o/ 14:01:12 hello 14:01:42 agenda as always: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda 14:01:58 looks light for today 14:02:09 hello 14:02:17 Hello 14:02:38 #topic Queens priorities 14:02:47 https://review.openstack.org/507534 14:02:53 I have updated the page 14:03:05 would like to merge it soon 14:03:40 I would like to ask the owners to add short description of the defined priorities 14:04:22 we also have some unassigned items 14:04:31 as usual I have a meeting strarting righ now ;-) 14:04:48 sorry, it's hard to join this meeting. 14:05:19 should we think of different time for meeting? 14:05:29 (today) 14:06:16 i don't think so. 14:06:53 akiraY: I think it's most difficult for you (and others in Japan) 14:07:14 I'm ok with this time, but I am not a regular, so I don't count. ;) 14:07:35 no problem for me :) 14:08:11 no pb here. 14:08:26 cool, let's move on then 14:08:52 any questions to prios? 14:09:22 No, I'll add a quick description as another patch 14:09:35 joadavis: thanks 14:09:46 +1 14:09:57 #topic Queens-1 milestone 14:10:14 we're reaching the first Queens milestone next week 14:10:40 I'll be tagging the repos 14:11:29 Cool. I'm sure you have it covered, but just in case, please be sure monasca-transform and monasca-ceilometer are included in your tag list 14:11:51 yes, we'll include 14:12:11 we still have problems with Zuul jobs 14:12:27 the migration at openstack-infra is in progress 14:13:04 Is there any word on how long it will take? 14:13:51 Among other things that's blocking https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504400/ which is in turn blocking Monasca on Pike for SUSE... 14:13:51 they wanted to rollout the new version today, but haven't due to unrelated issues 14:14:26 For if it takes a lot longer I'll just add that patch to our package locally :-) 14:14:56 I'm afraid I cannot predict right now 14:16:03 #topic oslo policy 14:16:17 jgr: your stage 14:16:35 witek: thanks :-) 14:16:52 https://review.openstack.org/511245 14:17:22 So I finished the first draft of the spec for using oslo.policy in monasca-{api,log-api} 14:18:04 It gives a rough outline of what we'd need to do to use oslo.policy and fulfill that community goal about policy in code 14:19:07 It's fairly straightforward for monasca-api because policy enforcement is mostly centralized there. It's not so straightforward for monasca-log-api because policy enforcement for monasca-log-api is all over the place. 14:19:53 I still hope to find a volunteer to implement this... :-) 14:20:41 I've done some research and identified most of the places that would need modifying, but I don't think I'll have the spare cycles to implement both this and https://review.openstack.org/511245 14:20:45 So...any takers? 14:21:11 if there are no volunteers I can take it 14:21:35 That'd be great 14:22:09 humm witek I think we could handle it 14:22:14 if u want 14:22:35 nseyvet: cool 14:22:41 Also, I can definitely ride shotgun on it (review, comment, help) 14:23:04 I think I'll find time for that much :-) 14:23:08 Amir will handle it. 14:23:15 great 14:25:15 that's really cool, let's review the spec then and Amir can start implementing 14:26:05 sounds good. 14:26:13 thanks nseyvet 14:26:32 #topic Cassandra 14:27:07 is jgu there? 14:27:20 witek: I am here 14:27:51 your stage :) 14:28:02 I finished the monasca api and persister (Java) to support cassandra. I think it's ready for review. 14:28:13 great 14:28:45 I created a story board and added link to the etherpad. do you want me to add the sotry board link to the review comments? 14:29:07 to the commit messages only 14:29:09 thanks 14:29:33 witek: sorry that's what I meant... commit msg. still trying to wake up 14:29:39 :) 14:30:14 sgrasley is working on the performance benchmark tool. do you prefer to add a perf testing folder in api and persister or have a new project? 14:31:11 is it Cassandra specific or general? 14:31:33 general, testing against kafka+persister and monasca rest api. 14:32:27 it might be worth adding to monasca-api, does he has already some code to take a look at? 14:32:59 not yet ready to send up for review 14:33:12 if we have some generic perf testing we could thing of adding rally gate jobs 14:34:08 that'd be cool. do you know what kind of hardware and deployment config on the rally gate? 14:34:59 no, would have to investigate 14:35:21 okay 14:36:23 so, if the code is something that we potentially could integrate in CI, it definitely makes sense to add existing repos 14:36:57 okay, that makes sense. 14:38:26 anything else on Cassandra? 14:38:37 no, thanks! 14:40:17 any other topics? 14:40:32 witek: Hello 14:40:39 hi 14:41:19 witek: I've written a new agent for network congestion, how can I propose it. 14:41:32 for review 14:42:11 as the first step you should create a story with short description in StoryBoard 14:42:43 if you have the code already, submit the code to review with the reference to the story 14:42:46 witek: the link please. 14:43:14 https://docs.openstack.org/monasca-api/latest/contributor/index.html 14:44:15 witek: ok, I will submit the description and the code for review. 14:44:25 thanks 14:44:26 witek: thank you 14:45:20 I understand you have a new plugin 14:45:48 for agent, right? 14:46:10 witek: yes a new agent plugin. 14:46:27 what metrics does it provide? 14:47:25 witek: it sends the packets and bytes and source of congestion. It's based on ECN marked packets 14:48:35 OK, I'm interested to see your change, thanks 14:49:07 witek: Thank you for your help. 14:49:24 you're welcome :) 14:49:30 :) 14:49:35 some more topics? 14:50:29 if not, I'll be closing 14:50:40 thank you everyone 14:50:44 thanks 14:50:47 Thanks 14:50:57 bye 14:51:03 #endmeeting