15:01:00 <rhochmuth> #startmeeting monasca 15:01:06 <openstack> Meeting started Wed May 3 15:01:00 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rhochmuth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca' 15:01:23 <witek> hello 15:01:25 <notq> heya 15:01:30 <kamil_> hello 15:01:37 <rhochmuth> hi everyone 15:01:39 <rhochmuth> o/ 15:01:44 <rhochmuth> here is the agenda 15:01:46 <rhochmuth> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda 15:01:55 <rhochmuth> Agenda for Wednesday April 26 2017 (15:00 UTC) 15:01:55 <rhochmuth> 1. OpenStack Summit 15:01:55 <rhochmuth> • Idea: OpenStack Monitoring Survey https://goo.gl/forms/FlNBGvnKffalCQdc2 (draft) 15:01:56 <rhochmuth> • Workshop material https://github.com/witekest/monasca-bootcamp 15:02:43 <rhochmuth> #topic • Idea: OpenStack Monitoring Survey https://goo.gl/forms/FlNBGvnKffalCQdc2(draft) 15:03:14 <witek> we would like make a survey in Boston about OpenStack monitoring 15:03:20 <notq> (draft) breaks the link to the monitoring survey 15:03:43 <rhochmuth> looks good to me 15:03:46 <witek> with the goal to better focus our activities in Monasca 15:04:00 <notq> no matter, I can get to the it with the previous link you posted just fine. 15:04:25 <notq> the topic one includes (draft) as part of the string for the url 15:04:57 <rhochmuth> how will this get posted 15:04:59 <witek> it's just an idea, our PM will polish it till Friday 15:05:09 <rhochmuth> will it be part of the workshop? 15:05:16 <witek> we thought about putting the link on our Wiki page 15:05:36 <witek> and the reference could be added during Monasca sessions 15:05:42 <notq> not a bad idea for it to tbe on the wiki page as well 15:05:45 <rhochmuth> sounds good 15:06:02 <rhochmuth> another idea is to post it to the openstack-ops 15:06:13 <witek> if you use any other channels, feel free to distribute as well 15:06:34 <witek> you mean the mailing list, or working group session? 15:06:43 <rhochmuth> the mailing list would be a good place 15:07:06 <rhochmuth> another area is if there are any monitoring ops sessions in Boston 15:07:21 <rhochmuth> then publicizing there would be good 15:07:29 <witek> ok, will check it 15:07:37 <witek> mailing list is good idea 15:08:09 <witek> we could also create a blog post presenting the results afterwards 15:08:20 <rhochmuth> the ops folks have an email list similar to openstack-dev 15:09:43 <rhochmuth> seems like we can move on to the next topic 15:09:45 <witek> we will have the ready draft on Friday, would someone like to review that? 15:09:55 <rhochmuth> sure i will review 15:10:27 <witek> also feel free to suggest any content 15:10:39 <rhochmuth> ok 15:10:44 <rhochmuth> #topic Workshop material 15:11:32 <witek> me again, based on Roland's and Michael's bootcamp from Austin 15:11:52 <witek> I have prepared material for the workshop in Boston 15:11:53 <rhochmuth> https://github.com/witekest/monasca-bootcamp 15:12:07 <rhochmuth> i'll review it 15:12:15 <witek> that would be great 15:12:28 <witek> anyone elso also wellcome 15:13:31 <witek> we're also looking for volounteers to help during the workshop 15:13:32 <kamil_> i will also check it 15:15:18 <rhochmuth> #topic review, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458271/ 15:15:37 <rhochmuth> sorry witek, thought should move one 15:15:47 <witek> yes, you were right :) 15:16:05 <jgu> witek: I can help review and depending the time, I could also volunteer 15:16:09 <rhochmuth> #topic review, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458271/ 15:16:31 <witek> jgu: would be great if you could help in the session 15:17:11 <bklei> witek i can also help in the session 15:17:23 <jgu> witek: send me the details pls 15:17:28 <bklei> same 15:17:47 <witek> bklei: jgu: cool, I contact you offline 15:17:52 <bklei> cool 15:19:01 <rhochmuth> thx jgu and bklei 15:19:13 <bklei> np 15:19:22 <jgu> np 15:20:17 <rhochmuth> irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/#topic review, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458271/ 15:20:36 <mworley> Looking to get +2 for 458271 15:20:37 <rhochmuth> that didn't work 15:21:00 <mworley> 458271 didn't work? 15:21:06 <notq> url doesn't work 15:21:18 <rhochmuth> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458271/ 15:21:45 <mworley> worked for me? storyboard is: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000997 15:21:52 <notq> yeah, i see it now 15:22:45 <rhochmuth> LGTM 15:23:34 <notq> looks good, don't love the log rotate name because of the other tool. log rotation might make more sense even though it's longer. 15:23:37 <notq> otherwise, nice 15:25:06 <rhochmuth> #topic Status of DevStack 15:25:32 <rhochmuth> Was just wondering about the status of DevStack 15:25:36 <rhochmuth> i did a build last night 15:26:07 <rhochmuth> with witek's changes for authenitcation 15:26:25 <rhochmuth> was able to login 15:26:30 <rhochmuth> to horizon 15:26:52 <rhochmuth> but connectivity to monasca-api didn't work 15:27:35 <witek> strange, tempest test all pass 15:27:48 <sc> rhochmuth: are you running via vagrant? 15:28:21 <rhochmuth> yes 15:28:58 <rhochmuth> built a complete vm last night 15:29:12 <witek> can you check if Keystone is deployed in mod_wsgi mode? 15:29:14 <mworley> I had to modify configs post vagrant to get things working 15:29:15 <mworley> http://192.168.10.6:35357/v3 15:29:32 <mworley> the port is no longer there 15:30:59 <rhochmuth> i built last night with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459259/, cherry-picked 15:31:05 <rhochmuth> into master 15:31:52 <rhochmuth> if there are fixes that are required 15:31:54 <rhochmuth> let me know 15:32:29 <rhochmuth> mworley: is there something that should be fixed and could be merged 15:33:21 <witek> Devstack deploys now Keystone as default in 'uwsgi' mode, without port 15:33:40 <mworley> Not sure, I might not have had latest monasca when I did a vagrant deploy, but I could not access mon cli 15:33:56 <mworley> I got error becuase using old keystone url 15:34:09 <witek> Artur has set WSGI_MODE=mod_wsgi in override-defaults to let it run as previously 15:35:47 <witek> he has also updated the plugin to use keystonemiddleware, so it should recognize how Keystone is deployed 15:36:06 <rhochmuth> is this all merged? 15:36:15 <witek> I will ping them tomorrow to check it again 15:36:28 <witek> https://review.openstack.org/458470 15:37:14 <rhochmuth> yeah, so that merged yesterday, which is the reason i built last night 15:37:27 <witek> please, check in your deployment if Keystone ports are used 15:37:43 <rhochmuth> i'll need to check later 15:37:51 <rhochmuth> not started right now 15:38:52 <mworley> My deploy did not have that fix in it 15:38:54 <witek> I hoped that changing to WSGI_MODE=mod_wsgi will save us from problems 15:39:43 <witek> and that we will migrate everything step by step to uwsgi 15:42:47 <rhochmuth> so it sounds like it is supposed to work right now 15:42:50 <rhochmuth> i'll test again 15:46:49 <rhochmuth> seems like we are done for the day 15:49:07 <rhochmuth> #endmeeting