15:00:41 #startmeeting monasca 15:00:45 o/ 15:00:52 Meeting started Wed Mar 22 15:00:41 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rhochmuth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:53 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:55 The meeting name has been set to 'monasca' 15:00:57 o/ 15:01:01 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda 15:01:01 o/ 15:01:02 o/ 15:01:10 o/ 15:01:17 hi everyone 15:01:33 i hope you met last week, but i was out on spring break 15:01:41 hopefully, that didn't create a problem 15:01:41 o/ 15:01:54 o/ 15:02:04 i don't see an agenda for this week 15:02:11 it is the agenda from last week 15:02:21 was that cover last week or should we cover this week? 15:03:33 not sure -- i was out too 15:03:57 what was in agenda was covered 15:04:08 thanks sc 15:04:14 I added some reviews for this week to get us started.. 15:04:17 so did the transition occur to storyboard 15:04:36 it is listed as march 20th 15:04:38 as far as I know, yes. I see my bug was migrated 15:04:51 thanks sc 15:04:57 very cool 15:05:14 what was the decision on cassandra? 15:05:40 and i saw an email from yuan 15:05:45 it may be all of us need to take a look at the tutorial that was sent on the list. Storyboard is really different from ubuntu tool 15:05:59 Storyboard link, in case anyone wants it: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/list?q=monasca 15:06:55 thx dhague 15:07:14 what about adding the link to storyboard into #openstack-monasca topic? 15:08:12 the irc channel 15:09:08 ok, i'll start looking at storyboard 15:09:19 how about the cassandra topic? 15:09:24 was that discussed last week 15:09:32 i guess i should have looked at the minutes 15:10:10 #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446514/ 15:11:01 dhague: i'll review that one 15:11:07 seems like a good fix 15:11:26 I found that with a Vagrant devstack install, the Influxdb schema uses a URL with 127.0.0.1 in it, so 127.0.0.1 needed adding to no_proxy 15:11:55 dhague: I tried and having 127.0.0.1 twice does not hurt 15:12:01 thanks, rhochmuth 15:12:04 thanks 15:12:09 #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446599/ 15:12:30 same scenario - the Apache URL was fixed, and very slow for me 15:12:44 this makes it look up the nearest mirror, so it's faster & more efficient 15:13:00 thanks, i'll also review and merge 15:13:05 seems like a good fix 15:13:11 this has given me problems in the past too 15:13:24 i'll need to get a devstack build done tonight 15:13:40 cool 15:13:43 but, i'm assuming this will work and i can merge 15:13:52 works on my machine (TM) 15:14:21 #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447439/ 15:14:24 worked on my, yesterday night ;-) 15:14:36 thx sc 15:14:45 OK, so this one expands on the caching already there from vagrant-cachier 15:15:12 cachier only caches the apt-get stuff (debs etc), this patch adds caching for python lib, npm, nvm, maven 15:15:16 does this improve re-deploy time 15:15:21 so that less of the internet needs to be downloaded each time 15:15:41 for me it's now in the 20-minute range instead of 1 hr + 15:15:54 so yes, it does 15:16:07 wow 15:16:11 that is significant 15:16:23 the openstack stuff is never cached, so you;re always using the latest openstack code, with compatible libraries 15:16:24 i think it normally takes me around 20 minutes 15:16:26 I cannot test this as far as I don't fix Vagrant to KVM problems 15:16:41 i'll also test this on tonight 15:16:44 or today 15:16:53 and merge if all works for me 15:17:01 looks like another good enhancement 15:17:18 you'll notice the difference on a second vagrant up, after an up & destroy cycle 15:18:34 #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447440/ 15:18:37 last one 15:18:42 this one is more cosmetic 15:19:21 ok, so i'll test all your reviews tonight dhague 15:19:27 but I noticed when the "pip install numpy" and "pip install monascaclient" were run, pip was not actually installed at that point 15:19:32 and if all goes well, should be merged 15:19:40 great, thanks 15:20:01 i had installed numpy for some analysis that i was always doing 15:20:08 i'm fine with removing it now 15:20:22 i can always install independently if i need it again 15:20:32 but i haven't used numpy in devstack in a long time 15:21:11 main thing is to add it after stack.sh is run, or put it in plugin.sh somewhere I guess 15:21:25 but yeah, it's not needed right now 15:21:34 i'm fine removing it 15:21:50 cool 15:21:58 i expect i'll get all your reviews merged tonight/soon 15:22:08 thanks for all the improvements 15:22:18 i'm interested to see how much faster it will be 15:22:22 pleasure: means I can start actually developnig now :-) 15:22:51 so, we have covered your lists dhague 15:22:59 should we review others 15:23:03 there is the list from last week 15:23:10 i can work my way through that off-line 15:24:57 I have quite a few pending reviews 15:25:07 templates, statsd, jmx 15:25:25 jobrs: yes, understand 15:25:30 will start working through that 15:25:36 saw your email last night 15:25:47 i don't see any problem meeting the time-frame 15:25:55 in fact, i would like to get through this much sooner 15:27:24 good news 15:27:24 i'll also discuss with michael getting some attention on those reviews 15:27:56 thanks 15:28:01 welcom 15:28:06 sorry about the delay 15:28:17 but things have been a bit crazy lately 15:28:21 np 15:28:36 hoping to get a little more review time 15:29:36 so, are there other reviews we want to look at 15:29:59 there is a long list from lst week 15:30:05 that i'll also work through off-line 15:30:37 why in the devstack plugin we don't switch to install_package? If I understand correctly using it we will be able to run devstack on CentOS and the like 15:31:55 i'm not familiar with install_package 15:32:12 but if that is a better way to install packages, i'm all for moving to it 15:33:01 I'll try, I was curious to try devstack on RPM based distro 15:33:25 thanks sc 15:33:42 i think it was just an awareness issue on our part 15:33:53 all for using newer/better tools 15:36:24 i believe that this reivew, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434537/, is nearing completion too 15:36:33 it is probably ready from getting some eyes on it 15:37:06 as well as the related reviews regarding alarm silencing, inhibition and grouping 15:38:03 ok, so i think we are done for today's meeting 15:38:10 unless someone has more topics 15:38:18 there are lot's of reviews in the funnel 15:38:35 that seems like the area we could use the most help at this point 15:38:52 going to close the meeting down then 15:38:54 thanks everyone 15:39:01 thanks, rhochmuth 15:39:21 #endmeeting