15:00:20 <rhochmuth> #startmeeting monasca
15:00:22 <rhochmuth> o/
15:00:24 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov  2 15:00:20 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rhochmuth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:28 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'monasca'
15:00:29 <rhochmuth> o/
15:01:07 <rhochmuth> Agenda for Wednesday November 2, 2016 (15:00 UTC)
15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 1.	 Reviews:
15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 1.	https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375717/
15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 2.	https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351930/
15:01:07 <rhochmuth> 2.	Update on the state of group_by?
15:01:15 <rhochmuth> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
15:01:24 <bklei> o/
15:01:27 <rhochmuth> anyone here?
15:01:42 <bklei> light crowd today
15:01:56 <rhochmuth> anyone here besides bklei?
15:02:03 <hosanai> o/
15:02:14 <rhochmuth> hi
15:02:22 <rbak> o/
15:02:28 <rhochmuth> well, we might as well get started
15:02:32 <rhochmuth> i still have jet lag
15:02:49 <rhochmuth> #topic https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca-team-meeting-agenda
15:03:00 <rhochmuth> #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375717/
15:03:11 <bklei> that's me
15:03:26 <rhochmuth> so, it looks like this is ready to be merged based on the comments and +1's
15:03:28 <bklei> this is add'l metadata to publish vm and tenant names to infra project
15:03:37 <bklei> i think so too
15:04:14 <bklei> u ok to merge then?
15:04:22 <rhochmuth> you may have the honors
15:04:30 <bklei> bueno!
15:04:57 <rhochmuth> #topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351930/
15:05:09 <rhochmuth> it is in merge conflict
15:05:22 <rhochmuth> other than that i thought it was ready to go
15:05:42 <rhochmuth> did you test it at all
15:05:43 <bklei> that's mr. brandt's -- group by
15:05:48 <rhochmuth> yup
15:06:10 <bklei> we haven't pulled it in to test -- the code looks good.
15:06:21 <rhochmuth> i was about to merge the other day, but another merge put it in conflict state again
15:06:37 <bklei> is ryan around to rebase?
15:06:38 <rhochmuth> rbrabdt: u there?
15:06:47 <rhochmuth> rbrandt: u there?
15:07:11 <rhochmuth> i think my team is having a planning meeting without me
15:07:18 <rhochmuth> as usual
15:07:26 <bklei> :)
15:07:27 <hosanai> hahaha
15:07:28 <rhochmuth> he's not on-line
15:07:39 <rhochmuth> i think they do it on purpose
15:08:29 <rhochmuth> i hipchatted him and let him know
15:08:49 <rhochmuth> so, hopefully later today we can merge that one
15:09:24 <rhochmuth> ok, maybe later today
15:09:50 <rhochmuth> is that the entire agenda?
15:09:55 <bklei> sweet -- that's all charter had
15:10:08 <rhochmuth> how are you making out with grafana 3?
15:10:16 <rhochmuth> and keystone integration?
15:10:31 <rbak> It's going to be grafana 4 soon
15:10:37 <rhochmuth> oh yeah
15:10:56 <rbak> But the keystone integration has been silent.  No word from rain tank lately.
15:11:14 <rbak> I'll try to get their attention again.
15:11:15 <rhochmuth> ok, thx
15:11:25 <rhochmuth> i was hoping for a break-through
15:11:51 <rhochmuth> we've also been given the silent tratment from elasitc about adding support for keystone to kibana
15:12:46 <rhochmuth> hosanai: do you have any topics?
15:13:07 <hosanai> in last week we made an use-case for monasca-analytics (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/monasca_analytics). I'm wondering if we have more that kind of use-cases or pain points in large env like charter
15:15:45 <hosanai> I would like to have use-cases like it based on actual problems
15:15:54 <rhochmuth> hosanai: sounds good
15:16:11 <rhochmuth> i think we could start to build up a catalog of use cases
15:16:20 <rhochmuth> similar to how that one was written up
15:16:42 <hosanai> yeah, sounds great!
15:16:45 <rhochmuth> i like that one, because i though it would be "simpler" to implement
15:17:03 <rhochmuth> and fit in with the ElasticSearch and Kibana
15:17:24 <rhochmuth> a very compelling use case, that we don't have to build a lot of extra infrastructure around
15:18:05 <hosanai> rhochmuth: i see
15:18:14 <rhochmuth> i spent a good amount of time trying to understand LDA and Dirichlet distributions
15:18:39 <rhochmuth> but, i still have to study more
15:19:36 <rhochmuth> i think some other use cases that can be added are
15:19:37 <hosanai> rhochmuth: ok, i will submit WIP state of LDA soon
15:19:47 <rhochmuth> anomaly detection for metrics
15:19:54 <rhochmuth> i could write-up that one too
15:20:35 <hosanai> which algorizm do you use?
15:20:40 <rhochmuth> i would be interested in understanding how the LINGAM algorithm workds differently than LDA
15:21:16 <rhochmuth> i don't have a specific algorihm in mind for anomaly detection in metrics, other than what I've used in the past
15:21:44 <hosanai> mean algorithm in your branch?
15:21:52 <rhochmuth> yeah
15:22:40 <hosanai> I didn't play with LNGAM but it's usuful to reduce operator's work
15:22:49 <hosanai> i think
15:22:59 <rhochmuth> ok, i'm going to head-off to another meeting
15:23:19 <rhochmuth> see you next week
15:23:24 <hosanai> bye
15:23:32 <rhochmuth> #endmeeting