16:06:33 #startmeeting Mistral 16:06:34 Meeting started Mon Feb 1 16:06:33 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is akuznetsova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:06:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:06:37 The meeting name has been set to 'mistral' 16:06:50 we are a little bit late today 16:07:03 so hi again to everyone 16:07:45 akuznetsova, waiting to someone or would you like to start ? 16:07:47 hello 16:08:32 I guess that we can silently start 16:08:56 NikolayM, do you know will rakhmerov be here? 16:10:09 yep, AFAIK he will 16:10:27 hi guys 16:10:30 sorry for being late 16:10:54 rakhmerov, we just start, ready to check action items from previous meeting 16:10:59 ok 16:11:01 thanks 16:11:07 hello rakhmerov 16:11:13 Hi Renat 16:11:21 hey, how's it going? 16:11:43 all great thanks 16:11:54 #topic Review Action items 16:12:00 let's back to AIs :-) 16:12:11 no, only I can do it) 16:12:16 #topic Review Action items 16:12:18 :) 16:12:24 ha-ha 16:12:38 what's up? ) 16:12:43 1. rakhmerov, hparekh_: discuss 16:12:43 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-items-filtering 16:12:51 done 16:12:57 nice 16:13:06 akuznetsova: will you be driving the meeting? 16:13:09 what is the result? 16:13:12 I'm ok with that 16:13:30 rakhmerov, I started it, so only I can set topics ) 16:13:42 did you decide to do API v3 for it? 16:13:46 ooh, I see 16:13:47 ok 16:13:52 NikolayM: we decided that he will provide an implementation and we'll review it ) 16:14:25 my concern was that it may make sense to implement it as part of API v3 but looks like it can be done relatively easy now 16:14:27 oh, ok, I just saw bp description and emails 16:14:36 btw, we still need to review it 16:14:46 I haven't still done it 16:14:50 need to update status of bp 16:14:59 ok, let's move on 16:15:00 now it is "not started" 16:15:11 2. rakhmerov: participate in [TripleO] Driving workflows with Mistral 16:15:11 hm.. let me update 16:15:50 I'm doing this so yes 16:15:54 it's being done 16:16:05 ok 16:16:14 that's all AIs 16:16:16 it's pretty huge thread already 16:16:19 ok 16:16:25 let's move to the next part 16:16:30 current status, yep 16:16:50 #topic Current Status 16:16:55 I will update for Liat / Gal (UI): 16:17:13 gpaz, thanks 16:17:30 my status: was on vacation last 2 weeks, now I'm back to reviewing process, reviewed a lot of patches today 16:17:34 Investigating https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-fail-transition-message and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-items-filtering 16:17:56 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=Actions-screen-improvements : I saw that one commit merged today : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259971/ 16:18:14 my status: was on a long sick leave (~2 weeks), mostly reviewing patches and participating in ML 16:18:39 also discussing security BPs with ALU (particularly Moshe) 16:18:41 Two other commits still in review and need to fix by gal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266826/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269150/ 16:18:51 my status: only review 16:19:00 Gal should back next week and continue to work on this commits 16:20:00 Limor started to work this morning on BP barbican action 16:20:01 any roadblocks, hanging on review commits ? 16:20:08 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/support-barbican-actions 16:20:43 rakhmerov, so if you can assign the bp on here please 16:21:00 her 16:21:36 gpaz: yes, sure 16:21:41 gimme a sec 16:21:53 rakhmerov, thank. np 16:22:09 working on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-mistral-actions. rakhmerov, sent you an email on the bp January 22. 16:22:10 ok, done 16:22:19 rakhmerov, thanks 16:23:06 dmowrer-: yeah, I saw it. Sorry, I was absent for a long time and am still processing a chaos that got accumulated during this period ) 16:23:22 ok. thanks! 16:23:30 can we move to the main topic ? 16:23:32 #action rakhmerov: replya to dmowrer- about mistral actions 16:24:02 akuznetsova: let's just make sure if anyone else wants to say something 16:24:22 are StackStorm guys here? 16:24:28 looks like not 16:24:48 ok 16:25:02 #topic Review M-3 BPs and bugs 16:25:05 akuznetsova: ok 16:25:23 give me a min pls.. 16:25:39 rakhmerov, please, go ahead, that was your topic 16:25:45 yep 16:26:45 so I just want to go over the BPs and bugs (mostly BPs) assigned to M-3 16:26:56 and prioritize them 16:27:01 #info https://launchpad.net/mistral/+milestone/mitaka-3 16:27:21 While we wait, I decided to show you this slide from a session I did in Nokia. it shows heat vs mistral progress. cool, right? 16:27:26 http://pasteboard.co/1etg3p3o.png 16:28:53 hm.. what does it show? 16:29:01 trying to figure out ) 16:29:16 activity in specified projects, I guess ) 16:30:03 how much attention did each project get since the start. Heat is clearly under 50 ppl in the first year and we passed that 16:30:03 ooh, Mistal started being active in last Aug 16:30:04 ok 16:30:14 yeah 16:30:32 cool ) 16:30:34 ok 16:31:09 M-3 ends on March 3 16:31:16 we have a month till the end 16:31:20 so 4 weeks 16:32:38 since in M-2 we did not complete everything we intended I moved all not completed stuff to M-3 16:33:30 so let's quickly discuss all bps 16:33:33 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/support-barbican-actions 16:33:51 this BP has been started by Limor and it's critically important for ALU (Nokia) 16:33:57 Limor is not here, as I update she started working on 16:34:04 yep 16:34:12 so we need to leave it assigned to M-3 16:34:18 yes 16:34:19 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-making-dsvm-gates-voting 16:34:43 honestly, I thing we need to move this one to backlog 16:34:54 I think it's too early to make this gate voting 16:35:06 it will slow down the development process 16:35:11 opinions? 16:35:31 wait a sec 16:35:39 I'd love to make it voting but first I'd like to get rid of some concurrent bugs that we have 16:35:41 yep 16:35:42 I am also working on to use tempest plugin in dvsm-gate 16:35:54 hparekh_: yes, we know 16:36:00 it's not too related I think 16:36:15 need to wait until we fully move to tempest plugin 16:36:17 we're discussing wether or not it should be a voting gate 16:36:22 right 16:36:24 it should 16:36:32 hmmm 16:36:40 like it all other project 16:36:45 projects 16:36:50 now? 16:37:05 what do you mean? 16:37:06 NikolayM: what do you think? 16:37:40 yea, it should be voting definetely 16:37:47 but not now 16:37:48 we need to make this gate voting, but not now, in the nearest future 16:37:57 I mean "eventually it should be voting, true. I'm just not sure we need to make it voting until we have more stable test passing" 16:38:05 yes 16:38:12 +1 16:38:19 ok 16:38:49 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-dashboard-cron-trigger-screen 16:39:06 gpaz: could you please give an update on this one? 16:39:11 afaik, this one is in progress 16:39:13 Gal is not here 16:39:15 yes give me a sec 16:39:20 I saw the commit 16:39:37 yes, it's started. I'm trying to understand if it could be finished in M-3 16:39:52 most likely yes but maybe gpaz can share some info 16:40:17 ther are two tasks that Gal should work on Action screen before moving this 16:40:20 but 16:41:09 there is one comit for cron trigger https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269150/ that he need to work on 16:41:42 ok 16:41:53 let's leave it in M-3 16:42:14 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/use-workflow-id-in-rest-api 16:42:15 He has the create cron trigger and need to complete the cron-trigger screen right after the things I wrote 16:42:24 ok 16:42:50 I thought this one was done, need to discuss it with Lingxian 16:43:07 #action rakhmerov: clarify status of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/use-workflow-id-in-rest-api with Lingxian 16:43:27 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-gate 16:43:48 akuznetsova: did you have an opportunity to investigate on this BP? 16:44:00 oh, that one is on me 16:44:34 no, need to discuss what exactly we want to see 16:45:37 hm.. ok 16:45:50 I can start work on it, but I am not sure that we will finish it in m3 16:46:03 I honestly don't believe we can finish it in 1 month 16:46:22 and it probably doesn't make sense because not so much was done on HA 16:46:38 I'd remove it from M-3 16:46:50 akuznetsova: what do you think? 16:47:22 agreed, but I will start to think about it 16:47:28 or at least we can discuss it with you offline, I think I know what we need to do on this BP 16:47:32 ok 16:47:51 #action rakhmerov, akuznetsova: discuss https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-gate 16:48:27 I think the same on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-functional-tests 16:48:57 or we can narrow it down to just a couple of tests 16:48:57 yes, they are connected 16:49:06 sort of a PoC 16:49:31 I'll remove it for now from M-3 and we'll discuss them together 16:49:35 with gate BP 16:49:55 ok 16:50:15 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ha-spec 16:50:23 that should be done in M-3 IMO 16:50:36 because it's a prerequisite for all other HA work 16:50:46 I've just assigned it to myself 16:51:17 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-multi-region-support 16:51:43 gpaz: I know it was needed by you. Do you know if anyone from ALU is planning to work on it? 16:51:56 I dont think we able to work on this right now 16:52:16 I mean within a month 16:52:28 ok 16:52:44 let's remove it for now 16:52:55 We will be able to know better probably next week if we can take that 16:53:06 ok 16:53:07 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-async-actions-doc 16:53:13 I will do that 16:53:29 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-alternative-rpc 16:53:30 ok, thanks... I will discussed with Moshe about that , thanks 16:53:57 NikolayM: as we discussed you need to participate in that oslo.messaging activity 16:54:12 they submitted a BP to add a new API for asynchronous processing 16:54:20 do you know the status of it? 16:54:46 no, I'll check 16:55:06 and will participate, yes 16:55:13 #action NikolayM: check the status of new API in oslo.messaging for async processing 16:55:16 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/actions-screen-improvements 16:55:21 gpaz: what about that? 16:55:37 I guess we can leave it in M-3, right? 16:55:48 I know it was partially done but not sure how much is still left 16:56:35 In our plan, yes 16:56:48 ok 16:56:48 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-tempest-plugin 16:57:04 this is mostly done, need to review 16:57:14 yeah 16:57:14 same about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-workflow-resource-sharing 16:57:26 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-action-amqp 16:57:42 this one is on review but we have a number of concerns about the implementation 16:57:47 needs to be finished 16:57:58 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-priority-task-scheduler 16:58:11 Winson is about to file a spec for it 16:58:22 and it's very much needed by SS 16:58:29 so let's leave it in M-3 too 16:58:45 that's all 16:58:48 rakhmerov: could you please add the bp I am working on to M-3? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-mistral-actions 16:58:58 ooh, yeah 16:58:59 sure 16:59:04 thanks! 16:59:15 we are out of time 16:59:26 done 16:59:30 yep 16:59:33 just a min 16:59:33 rakhmerov, if I have time for little question 16:59:50 ok, we have 13 BPs and half of them are about to be completed 16:59:53 gpaz: go ahead 16:59:55 bugs can be fix after M-3 right ? 17:00:14 absolutely yes 17:00:20 great thanks 17:00:21 yes 17:00:28 ok, thanks to everyone for joining 17:00:31 bye! 17:00:32 have a good one 17:00:38 thank you 17:00:39 akuznetsova: could you pls end the meeting? 17:00:44 bye 17:00:46 bye 17:00:47 #endmeeting