16:00:34 #startmeeting Mistral 16:00:35 Meeting started Mon Sep 1 16:00:34 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rakhmerov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:37 hello 16:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'mistral' 16:01:13 hi 16:01:19 Hey 16:02:03 hi 16:02:24 Kirill, I know folks in the US celebrate labor day today, do you know by any chance if Dmitri was going to join us today? 16:03:24 enykeev? 16:03:29 No idea, haven't seen him today 16:03:56 ok 16:04:23 ok, let's quickly go through our agenda items today 16:04:34 #topic Review Action Items 16:04:37 1. rakhmerov and others: discuss workflow other types 16:05:36 it's not a good time to discuss this thing now, it's a long term topic 16:05:46 #action rakhmerov and others: discuss workflow other types 16:06:10 rakhmerov, start a ML discussion about Glance integration 16:06:10 rakhmerov, talk to Angus about versioning CLI 16:06:10 rakhmerov, validate that we can release a minor version for the old client of the new one goes forward 16:06:23 these 3 items are not relevant anymore 16:06:43 it's all either decided or implemented 16:06:59 #topic Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) 16:07:10 let's quickly report what you're up to 16:07:16 Spent the week by implementing v2 API and fixing nasty little bugs along the way. 16:07:35 ok, it is done, right? 16:07:50 as far as I can tell 16:07:55 ok 16:08:23 last week I worked on the implementation delayed calls and mistralclient v2 (client and CLI) 16:08:28 we are still missing action API, though 16:09:03 yes, that's fine 16:09:11 shouldn't be that hard to add them 16:09:14 enykeev, we can create actions endpoint 16:09:23 yes 16:09:24 I added two more tests and finish mistral-workflow-execution-tests blueprint 16:09:32 ok 16:09:54 my status: made a lot of changes in engine and execution infrastructure last week, discussed workflow policies with Dmitri and started working on them (kind of challenging thing), had lots of design discussions with all the team 16:10:27 guys, I know you found a bug in Bryan's commit (already merged), are you sure you know how to fix it? 16:10:33 if yes, please just do it 16:10:45 if know, we can discuss it here or tomorrow 16:10:46 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118187/ 16:10:58 I guess this can fix it 16:11:08 ooh, ok 16:11:13 I'll take a look 16:12:09 need to wait a gate and we will see 16:12:16 nmakhotkin_, we should probably also add unit test for that 16:12:47 yep ) 16:13:11 yes 16:13:16 akuznetsova, any progress on that Pool size issue? 16:14:31 one issue will be fixed with nmakhotkin_ commit 16:15:04 but generally i didn't find the root of problem 16:15:09 ooh, ok 16:15:14 let's discuss tomorrow 16:15:16 will spend more time tomorrow 16:15:22 ok, thanks 16:15:32 #topic Release 0.1 progress 16:15:37 ook 16:16:16 you can take a look at the milestone at LP: https://launchpad.net/mistral/+milestone/0.1 16:16:53 we have three BPs that we didn't start working on 16:17:32 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ui 16:17:40 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-workflow-wait-policy 16:17:46 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-terminal-states 16:18:14 and pretty heavy that I am now working on: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-workflow-policies 16:18:20 I plan to start wait policy in a few days 16:18:26 I'll probably spend at least 3-4 days on it 16:18:37 yes, I think it shouldn't be that hard 16:18:50 and it will be based on delayed calls services 16:19:06 yes :) 16:19:15 Kirill, Nikolay, how would you estimate adjusting mistral-ui? 16:19:36 so that it works with API V2 16:20:47 would 2-3 days be enough to fix it? 16:21:01 from your perspective 16:21:20 really hard to tell. Most of the things should take about a day or two, but there might be some nasty bugs and there were lots of changes in horizon lately 16:21:35 ooh, really? 16:21:41 what kind of changes? 16:22:06 or if you have, please share a link or something to find out about them 16:23:08 afaik, they are rewriting UI parts pretty badly and this was their main goal for this release, although I haven't paid too much attention 16:23:21 ok 16:23:46 I didn't think to include this BP at all into 0.1, and if we need we can still exclude it but I'm still hoping to get it done 16:23:47 ok 16:24:47 so I think finishing up all current activities (API, client, hanging patches) will take other 2-3 days so we'll have about 6-7 days left till the end of the cycle 16:24:57 for 3 BPs 16:25:02 seems ok to me 16:25:41 I'm just a little worried about having not really comprehensive testing for some of the new things 16:25:53 may be we need to look at it and see where we can improve it 16:26:17 first of all, I'm talking about engine, Data Flow etc. (my part actually :) ) 16:26:35 even though I try to test main things we may want to add more tests 16:26:57 ok, do you guys want to discuss anything else? 16:27:13 #topic Open Discussion 16:27:45 if no, we can go to bed :) 16:28:35 nope, nothing 16:28:38 ok, let's finish 16:28:45 bye and thanks to everyone! 16:28:48 thanks 16:28:50 bye! 16:28:53 #endmeeting