15:59:43 #startmeeting Mistral 15:59:44 Meeting started Mon Apr 14 15:59:43 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rakhmerov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:59:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:59:47 The meeting name has been set to 'mistral' 16:00:04 hey! 16:00:13 hi! 16:00:17 hi guys 16:00:31 let's wait for a couple of mins and start 16:00:50 in the meantime I'll type in all the standard stuff 16:01:14 agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MistralAgenda 16:01:33 let's quickly review AIs 16:01:55 #topic Review Action Items 16:02:20 1. (tnurlygayanov) plan to write new tempest tests with execution of the real workflows 16:03:08 afaik, timur is still involved into other projects 16:03:33 #action (tnurlygayanov) plan to write new tempest tests with execution of the real workflows 16:03:47 2. Timur, make sure to look at running Mistral tests in devstack gate 16:04:04 hi guys, sorry my inet is up and down... 16:04:16 hi Dmitri, ok, no problem 16:04:47 regarding this action item, we found other resources in Mirantis to set up devstack gate job 16:05:13 he's supposed to start working on it this week or on the next one 16:05:40 #action (rakhmerov) Check the status of devstack gate job 16:05:57 3. (nmakhotkin) take a look at dzimine's and m4dcoder's workflows 16:06:35 nmakhotkin, I know you were busy with a different work but did you have a chance to look at it? 16:06:59 I didn't :) I'll definitely start doing it tomorrow since I finished my current work 16:07:50 I'll look at it asap, tomorrow, I think 16:08:00 ok 16:08:18 4. Finish current Demo scenario (make it work) and evaluate workflow examples from Winson's team to find better ideas for Demo 16:08:47 regarding this one, the first part is done (we'll talk about it later), nmakhotking made our Demo scenario work 16:09:27 once my 10 commits get merged we'll fix all the samples in mistral-extra to make DSL more consistent but basically it works 16:10:18 any questions on Action Items? 16:10:28 if no, we'll move forward to the current status 16:10:49 just to clarify: 16:11:15 ok 16:11:17 do you want to prep demo scenario changes based on Action commits? 16:11:29 This can be started now, right? 16:11:52 yes, I would love to have these change in 16:12:18 who is doing demo scenarios adjustments to Action changes? 16:12:21 what do mean by "started now"? 16:12:43 I am going to do it myself tomorrow, it'll take 30 mins 16:12:53 Nikolay doesn't work on Tuesdays 16:13:43 can we move forward? 16:14:00 ok 16:14:06 #topic Current Status 16:14:24 I basically finished BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-actions-design except plugin architecture 16:14:49 and I have a couple of cosmetic changes to make tomorrow 16:15:27 so my plan is to make adjustements in Demo Scenario (Nikolay, make sure to share it today) 16:15:57 so please report your status quickly 16:16:03 Nikolay? 16:16:05 I've spent most of the week preparing test suite for Lazy Engine. Also published a summary on integration. 16:16:22 enykeev, ok, great work 16:16:58 i'm still working on the engine standalone process. 16:17:21 m4dcoder, do you have any roadblocks? Need help? 16:17:48 I've already sent the commit on review with demo related changes 16:17:51 no tough roadblocks just some design choices. i'll send out a WIP for review soon. 16:18:21 nmakhotkin, ok 16:19:09 m4dcoder: may be bring up the design choices to discuss prior to reveiw, if you need any input (or reduce argument over code already written :) ) 16:19:11 m4dcoder, ok, please feel free to ask any questions and/or setup dedicated meetings if you think it would be helpful for you 16:19:25 will do 16:20:21 basically, IMO there's no rush with this task, we can discuss it in a comfortable mode 16:20:45 if you'd like we can do it now or take it offline, whatever you prefer 16:21:57 dzimine, as far as Manas, we saw his commit. It's fine but we just had one small remark 16:22:06 perfectly easy to fix 16:22:28 would appreciate if he could fix it today/tomorrow 16:22:32 ok, hope he'll be done with this today 16:22:40 ok, perfect 16:23:11 #topic POC Demo Scenario readiness 16:23:24 we already touched it a little bit 16:24:04 we planned to look at workflow scenarios provided by Dmitri but honestly I was unable to do it deeply by now 16:24:39 since I finished my current work I can do it tomorrow, nothing should prevent me from doing it 16:25:23 so the current scenario works, I just want to make sure to look at other options and see if we can come up with something better 16:26:03 on Thursday we are going to have an internal demo in Mirantis so we'll get a feedback from Mirantis management 16:26:23 do you guys see what else we could discuss on that? 16:26:30 any concerns, questions? 16:26:42 I have a suggestion 16:26:52 the scenario itself is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86597/ 16:26:58 yes, Igor 16:27:10 I'd like to have a list of things which we need to have in order to think we are ready with POC 16:27:20 I mean, list of documents, examples, Bps, ... with links 16:27:25 Do we have any? 16:27:50 it's mostly in our heads unfortunately 16:27:58 It's fine 16:28:10 I can do formalize it 16:28:13 It's easy to type it in then, isn't it? :) 16:28:22 yes 16:28:49 Having such a list would make it easy to present the results, say, to Heat team, or Fuel team, or any other team 16:29:06 how about preparing this list offline (just to save time now) and sending it out in ML? 16:29:08 sure 16:29:10 I agree 16:29:44 +1 for offline preparation and ML 16:30:20 Hi. By the way I submitted a proposal for Atlanta summit session slot. http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/124 16:30:21 #action (rakhmerov) Prepare a list of formal criterias of POC readiness (list of documents, examples, Bps, ... with links) 16:30:28 It is for Mistral POC. 16:30:43 It is in the prapproved state. 16:30:52 hi gogrokve 16:30:57 ok, cool 16:31:08 So you will have a time slot on the summit to present Mistral and show a emo 16:31:14 demo 16:31:21 yes, very good 16:31:32 fantastic, thanks gokrokv 16:31:41 how much time will we have for the presentation? 16:31:47 40 mins like unconference track? 16:32:02 I don't know yet. Somethin from 15 to 40 minutes I think. 16:32:30 we discussed it with Dmitri already and it would be cool to know. Depending on that we should have a different presentation plan IMO 16:32:43 Renat, you can actually add commet to this proposed session. 16:32:45 but ok, we'll figure it out 16:33:00 Renat, you can actually add a comment to this proposed session. 16:33:09 or you can ask Thierry 16:33:15 sure 16:33:19 ok 16:34:18 the last specific topic we hae is TaskFlow integration status 16:34:25 #topic TaskFlow integration status 16:34:44 Kirill, could you please provide an update on that? 16:35:01 I assume there's almost nothing new but anyway.. 16:35:31 Nothing actually changed since the last week. We still waiting for TaskFlow team to prepare their proposition. 16:36:13 yeah, I guess the only thing we got from them is an email where Joshua said "Ivan is still working on it.." 16:36:16 something like that 16:36:16 The ball is on TaskFlow team side, 16:36:23 yep :) 16:36:29 their move now 16:36:30 we should ask them 'when' 16:36:45 it was supposed to be done last Thursday 16:37:25 but agree that we should keep tracking it 16:37:37 I'll be pinging them every couple of days 16:37:50 any question on this part? 16:38:01 if no we can move to an open discussion 16:39:11 #action (rakhmerov) Keep pinging TaskFlow team regarding Ivan's ideas 16:39:14 #topic Open Discussion 16:40:07 just want to bug you again, guys. Sorry if it's a little bit annoying 16:40:37 I encourage you to review the commits for BP mistral-actions-design 16:40:49 since we really need them asap 16:42:10 dzimine, I would even ask Manas to make his commit dependent on the last commit for this BP to make things simpler when we merge all these things 16:42:21 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87231/ 16:42:54 otherwise the process of rebasing my ten commits will be really painful :) 16:42:57 I'll do the reveiws - you said not much chnaged, right? 16:43:03 yes 16:43:11 minor changes 16:43:22 ok, do ask Manas, I seee (pls email him directly) 16:43:34 some of the questions raised in the first 6 commits have been addresed in the last 4 commits 16:43:53 dzimine, ok 16:44:16 other than that I don't really have anything specific for now to discuss 16:44:24 if you do then fire away 16:45:55 dzimine, you can actually pick the last one commit you have reviewed in Old Version History dropdown and it'll only show you the difference between them. 16:48:12 yes 16:48:48 ok, so let's finish the meeting then? 16:48:54 yes. 16:48:57 :) 16:49:04 thanks to everyone! 16:49:14 thanks 16:49:17 let's meet on Apr 21st 16:49:21 bye guys 16:49:32 #endmeeting